Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mayor Bloomberg's Girlfriend Sits on the Board of Brookfield Properties

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 06:34 PM
Original message
Mayor Bloomberg's Girlfriend Sits on the Board of Brookfield Properties
Which is Acting at the Behest of the Mayor

http://blog.buzzflash.com/node/13076

According to the New York Times, Mayor Bloomberg's girlfriend, Diana L. Taylor, sits on the board of Brookfield Properties, the owner of Zucotti Park (AKA Liberty Park). But that's hardly the ownly tie that has resulted in Brookfield becoming an active partner in Bloomberg's efforts to close down Occupy Wall Street.

The current gambit of, in essence, closing the public headquarters of the movement under the guise of "cleaning up" the park, and then imposing rules that would prohibit anything other than pedestrian traffic and sitting on benches, is now delayed. (It had originally been scheduled for 7 AM EST Friday.)

(snip)

Bloomberg had first tried to use the NYPD -- and perhaps others -- to infiltrate and perhaps bait the Occupy Wall Street protesters into some sort of violent act, which would turn public opinion against them, and allow him to use the sort of excessive police force employed in "The Battle of Seattle" several years ago to cut off the head of the populist surge that has put corporations and Wall Street on the defensive. That didn't work, even though hundreds of people were arrested after claiming that the police led them onto the street level of the Brooklyn Bridge and then arrested them.

But plan "B" was for Brookfield Properties, which technically owns the public park as a result of it being built in return for zoning variations in the area, to "ask" for police help if plan "A" didn't pan out.

(end snip)

Whazzup with mayors of NYC and their girlfriends?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well private property owners are liable for incidences on their land I imagine.
Anyone with a mind to protecting themselves from lawsuits would need to consider the downsides and show they tried to address it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheMadMonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. If you didn't spell like a republican with pretentions of literacy...
The word is "INCIDENTS" and liability is limited to that which a property owner can be presumed to have control over.

I'm often amongst the first to play devil's advocate and that effort is just plain lame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Are you a lawyer because I swear I learned in Bus Law that property owners had more exposure
Than you claim.

http://wiki.injuryboard.com/help-center/articles/property-owners-liability-safety-and-prevention.aspx

Property Owner Duties and Responsibilities

Property owners owe varying responsibilities, or duties, to those people who come to their property, depending on legal category of the person involved. The law acknowledges three main categories of people who may be on someone else’s property, they are: licensees, invitees and trespassers. The greatest duty is to those who are considered “invitees.” In the states that acknowledge these legal categories, the legal duties owed to each category can differ greatly. It is imperative to ask an attorney if these standards and categories apply within your state of residency.

Three Legal Categories Explained

Invitees -- An invitee is an individual who is invited onto the property by the possessor of the property, such as a member of the public, or one who's invited to the property for the purpose of business dealings. Under such standards, a property owner not only bares a duty to repair or correct any known dangers, he also bares the responsibility to inspect, discover and correct any hidden or unknown hazards on the areas of the premises which an invitee would typically have access.

Such obligations mean the property owner or possessor (a business that occupies the property) has a duty to take reasonable precautions to ensure the environment is safe for all visitors. While there is no exact way to measure what is deemed as reasonable, the law defines reasonable as what a person of ordinary judgment and intelligence would do in the same circumstance.

To better explain, we offer the following example: it may appear reasonable to expect a business owner to conduct inspections on a regular basis, or to maintain and clean stairwells on the property to make sure they are safe and free of hazards. In the reverse, it would be unreasonable to expect a business owner to keep watch all day long to make sure nothing is spilled on the stairs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheMadMonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. "What a property owner can be presumed to have control over."
"Reasonably presumed" if you must qualify. This does not justify a total lockdown based upon speculation that a criminal act MIGHT occur.

Oh and in this case, I can be damned near certain that before opening up the park as a public space, Bloomberg will have put all possible legal distance between them and liability for anything which occured there, particularly the criminal acts of others, else they would be responsible for everthing from slips in dog shit to muggings and rape.

It's a public space, public space rules pertain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rugger1869 Donating Member (71 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-11 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. Pretentions?
Those in glass houses....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyglet Donating Member (256 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. Whazzup with cities and
what should be public land being privately owned? I don't care what it was in exchange for....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
former9thward Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Why should it be public land?
The area never belonged to the city.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarCenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Real estate developers and local politicians are generally in cahoots
In the case of NY, there are many of these deals, where a developer wants to do something like put up a building that doesn't conform to set back requirements, is too tall, etc. So the developer will dedicate some land for public use in return for bending the rules in some other area.

In this case, the adjacent skyscraper was built with some variances in return for the developer creating Zuccoti Park (which was originally Liberty Plaza, and the building is still One Liberty Plaza, IIRC).

The city doesn't necessarily want to maintain these little pieces of "public" park, so the title stays with the owner of the building, who also maintains it, typically by paving it over with masonry to the extent possible.

There is no doubt extensive paperwork documenting the deal.

http://www.brookfieldofficeproperties.com/content/portfolio-2904.html#/USMarkets/NewYork/LowerManhattan

One Liberty Plaza is the orange building just north of the park in the map.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
6. Bloomberg has a girlfriend?
really? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bengalherder Donating Member (718 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
9. There was once on that property a statue of King George III
It was torn down and melted by the revolution.

I hope the same fate awaits that asinine golden calf of commerce a scant few blocks away.

And may our mad leaders pass from power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC