Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

California skydiving sex video, stunt meant for 'Howard Stern Show,' draws attention of FAA instead

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
brooklynite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-11 12:15 AM
Original message
California skydiving sex video, stunt meant for 'Howard Stern Show,' draws attention of FAA instead
from the http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/2011/10/14/2011-10-14_california_skydiving_sex_video_stunt_meant_for_howard_stern_show_draws_attention.html">New York Daily News:

A midair collision of the salacious kind is under investigation by the Federal Aviation Administration.

A pair of California skydivers filmed an explicit video of themselves engaged in midair sexual intercourse in a attempt to get themselves on "The Howard Stern Show," Bakersfield, Calif.'s, KGET-TV reported.

The stunt, however, climaxed in a pink slip for part-time skydiving instructor - and professional porn star - Alex Torres, says his boss, David Chrouch, the owner of Skydive Taft.

Chrouch - who was informed about the viral video by local police - said he was still mulling whether to fire Torres' aerial partner, company receptionist Hope Howell.


I have no respect for anything relating to Howard Stern, but I'm not clear why this kind of stupidity is a regulatory or legal issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Major Nikon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-11 12:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. I doubt it will be
That's not to say the FAA doesn't try to enforce some things that are real head scratchers, but I can't see them actually taking any action against the pilot in this instance. It wasn't as if he was an active participant. There has been several outfits that offered a mile high service to couples, and I don't remember any facing additional FAA scrutiny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-11 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
2. I have to admire a guy who can get a boner while plummeting
To earth after jumping out of an airplane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evasporque Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-11 07:26 AM
Response to Reply #2
15. America in general admires guys with boners...
We have enough boner pill and enhancement ads on TV to prove that...anf we have a big orange boner in DC...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberty Belle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-11 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
3. Are you kidding me? Would you want children to see that?
There are laws against lewd and lascivious conduct and indecent exposure. These people should be prosecuted. Sex in midair could be seen by anyone, including children.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rugger1869 Donating Member (71 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-11 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yes, yes... we must protect the children!
God forbid they see a nude body or sex. So un-natural. Far better to place them in front of a TV. No "lewd and lascivious" conduct there. Just, on average, 30 acts of violence a night before you tuck them in to bed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberty Belle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-11 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Not in my household!
So you don't think parents should have the right to prevent kids from seeing porn in the sky?

not every parent lets kids watch whatever garbage is on TV. Our kids our grown now, but we definitely exerted our parental rights to make sure they didn't watch inappropriate material on TV when they were younger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-11 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. When I was younger I always searched the skies for porn, nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-11 01:00 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. It was a private plane, Maude
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ET Awful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-11 07:06 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. Either you're joking, or you kids have DAMN good eyesight.
You can't possibly really believe that a kid could actually see what two people were doing while sky diving.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MedicalAdmin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-11 07:52 AM
Response to Reply #6
16. Riiiiiiight.
I'm assuming that your kids either have binoculars welded to their face, or you've genetically spliced them with an eagle. It's not exactly like you can see detail or anything at that distance and speed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-11 01:59 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. If you're not joking...
...then you're comment is kinda freaking me out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sce56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-11 02:26 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. Gimme a break did they schedule it like sesame street? To see what they were doing in freefall
You would have to know before hand and have a powerful pair of binoculars or telescope. To say kids would see it is ridiculous! They would be dead if still in the act at a visible level of the sky!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-11 12:38 AM
Response to Original message
5. Did they get into the Mile-High Club?
I guess that would depend on the starting altitude?



But what's the big deal? The woman and the guy each wear clothes that make access easy. Say, she's in a bikini and he's in pajama pants.

Adjust the clothing, go at it, then re-adjust the clothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MilesColtrane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-11 02:47 AM
Response to Original message
11. Remind me not to look up the next time I hear a small plane overhead...
unless I'm wearing goggles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-11 03:13 AM
Response to Original message
12. .

+
=



PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-11 07:22 AM
Response to Original message
14. And they were yelling. Bababooey! Bababooey!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 04:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC