Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Eric Cantor: We Need To Rely On The Wealthy To Address Income Inequality

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Galraedia Donating Member (322 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 01:10 PM
Original message
Eric Cantor: We Need To Rely On The Wealthy To Address Income Inequality
"The 99 percent movement protests are going global as more and more people seek to register their frustration with corporate greed and injust economic policies. Preferential tax treatment has helped drive the U.S. to its worst level of income inequality since the Great Depression, with the nation ranking more unequal than the Ivory Coast, Ethiopia, and Pakistan. Since 1979, “the gaps in after-tax income between the richest 1 percent of Americans and the middle and poorest fifths of the country more than tripled.”

America’s recognition of the indisputable level of inequality is forcing Republicans to back away from their condescending treatment of the “Occupy” protesters. Once concerned about these “growing mobs,” House Majority Eric Cantor (R-VA) is making an about-face. Today on Fox News Sunday, he told host Chris Wallace that the president and Republicans “agree that there is too much income disparity in this country.” Pointing to the public’s “complaint” about the unfair economic playing field, he insisted that Congress should rely on America’s wealthy “to take care of income disparity”:

CANTOR: We know in this country there is a complaint on the folks on the top end of the income scale that they make too much and folks on the end don’t make enough. We need to encourage those on the top income scale to create more jobs. We are about income mobility and that’s what we should be focused on to take care of the income disparity.

Relying solely on the wealthy to reduce income inequality seems woefully out of touch with reality. Numerous corporations are sitting on enormous profit, paying more to their CEOs than in taxes. Last year, CEO salaries increased by 27 percent while private worker wages increased by only 2 percent. This pattern will hardly help address the disparity.

What’s more, any concern that Cantor and Republican lawmakers have about income inequality seems to be about maintaining it. Cantor voted to make the Bush tax cuts permanent, tax cuts that “actually increased economic inequality by delivering more than half of their benefits in 2010 to the top 10 percent of earners, who make over $170,000 a year. In fact, 38 percent of the dollar benefits went to the top 1 percent of earners.” He champions (and co-sponsored) a reduction in the capital gains tax, another policy that helps drive income inequality.

These are just a few of the many positions — including promoting tax increases on the middle class while protecting the preferential treatment of the wealthy — that have driven the disparity he suddenly seems to care about. There’s no question that inequality is in need of attention, as increasing income inequality effectively suffocates economic growth. But if Cantor is serious about addressing this issue, he’ll have to change nearly all his policies to do it."

http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2011/10/16/345085/cantor-we-need-to-rely-on-the-wealthy-to-address-income-inequality/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
surrealAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. Has he been asleep for the last twelve years, or what?
We tried exactly that.
It was a spectacular failure.
It's time to try something else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. no, he's been wide awake orchestrating the very situation we're in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. More than 12 years. Started in 1980, even earlier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andy823 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. As usual, Cantor is wrong!
The reason we are in this mess is from letting corporations do their own regulating, and that worked so well! :sarcasm:

We need congress to make sure the rich pay their fair share, along with the corporations. We need congress to get rid of the loop holes that allow the rich and the corporations to cheat on their taxes. The right it crazy to think the rich can take care of this themselves, not when history proves otherwise!

This goes to show just how scared the right is of OWS. They know this is not some short lived protest, and they know if they keep on lying to the public, saying they are "listening" to the people, things will get worse for them, the ones who actually work for the rich not the people who are the 99%!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BanzaiBonnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. Our masters... we SHOULD be grateful to them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
6. We need to rely on criminals to stop crime. After all, who else has the power?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izquierdista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
7. Logical
The vampire squids have sucked up all of the money. Calimari, anyone? There's plenty to go around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
8. Less than a whore, he'll get on any winning side, no matter what it is.
I have far more respect for whores. Most politicians seem to be a completely different animal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
9. Trickle down failedf or the wealth would not be so skewed in favor
of the rich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amonester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #9
22. "Trickle down" was their propaganda for "Trickle up" in reality.
Just like all theiR otheR$: "war is peace" et al.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
10. Hey STOOPID! Yeah, I mean YOU, Cantor!
The wealthy have spoken loud and clear. They LOVE income inequality! They LOVE the misallocation of the rewards of labor! The LOVE the maldsitribution of wealth!

Asshole! They're the PROBLEM. They can't possibly provide any solution!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
11. what a pathetic, clueless boob.
Is he even any use to his constituents back in Virginia?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
12. He's a 1% man
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
13. The wealthy will 'address' it all right --- as in, "send all your money to my address!"
Cantor is a bone-deep idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
14. "we need to give those on the top even more or NO JOB FOR YOU!!!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
15. Cantor: "Foxes will make FINE guards for the henhouse!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
16. Trickle down economics = trust the rich. A failed program.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
17. Because the rich always take care of the poor, always giving
them a helping hand, like they have the last 100 years.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
18. It's not just out of touch. It's the most cynical kind of lie. No one elected could be that stupid.
Would he be so trusting of human nature to run welfare on the honor system? "The poor should take care of medicaid costs."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
19. The wealthy have been doing a great job taking care of the income disparity
That's why the OWS exists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
socialindependocrat Donating Member (379 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
20. We need a new congress and a gov "by the people"
I sent a note to Pres obama, Biden and Nancy Peloci to say that congress needed a mission statement that siad that every decision they make should make life better for all Americans.

When we get money out of politics

and

We get the "BOUGHT" reps out of office and show them what a pissed off electorate can do....

We then get in charge of finances and business and start to regulate what can and cannot be done!!

It's obvious that they can't be trusted to self-regulate and share the wealth.

It's our turn now, people!!!

Let's restructure politics as we know it!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lifesbeautifulmagic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
21. over and over, people has been asking the 1% for decently
paying, jobs, "or else".

Well, they have had years, and this is the "or else".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow2u3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
23. Cantor would also like to rely on John Gotti to rein in the Mafia
Edited on Sun Oct-16-11 05:12 PM by meow2u3
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
24. Cantor is the mouth piece for the 1%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC