Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Beck on OWS: "This is a Marxist revolution that is global in nature."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
white_wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 01:25 PM
Original message
Beck on OWS: "This is a Marxist revolution that is global in nature."
I wish! However, I'm afraid comrade Beck is a bit optimistic. Seriously, though does this idiot even think before he opens his mouth? Here is the link, its a clip from Pappa Bear's show, so be warned you have to deal with them both, and it's on Beck's website. You can just skip to the 2:50 mark to see the part I quoted. http://www.glennbeck.com/2011/10/15/glenn-on-oreilly-factor-occupy-wall-street-global-in-nature/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. that works for me....
Edited on Sun Oct-16-11 01:28 PM by mike_c
Too bad it's not, but the American fall is still young, LOL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vets74 Donating Member (714 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
43. "What do we want ? -- JOBS !!" -- chant walking up to Times Square
And there's this that spread out:



Financial managers caused this Depression of 2008.

Massive frauds.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #43
47. Well said.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well Beck has this right
it is a revolution... marxist... nope... but it is a revolution.

Of course any revolution would be scary to Mr. Beck unless it was a neocon revolution
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Earth_First Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. Hey, Glenn: boo!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. proving that Beck hasn't bothered to read Marx, either
among a long, long list of other critical thinkers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. #OWS on Beck: Haha! (Nelson voice)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. This just proves Beck has no fucking idea what he is talking about
if this was a Marxist revolution, it would be a violent revolution, this is more Lasallian in nature. Revolution through political action rather then violence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coalition_unwilling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #6
16. Excuse me, but where in Marx' canon do you find support for
Edited on Sun Oct-16-11 02:10 PM by coalition_unwilling
"a violent revolution"? Maybe a Marxist-Leninist revolution (with its notion of a revolutionary vanguard leading the proletariat) might be violent. But I'm not aware of Marx himself calling for violence to overthrow capitalism. Marx saw capitalism's overthrow as historically inevitable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Puregonzo1188 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. And even then the Bolshevik Revolution itself wasn't that violent at all.
Mostly because they had the support of the people and Kerensky's government just packed up and left. The historic seizing of the White Palace was mostly just taking an empty building. In fact, the Bolsheviks even ruled in coalition with another party for six months.

The Civil War, on the other hand, was incredibly violent on all sides, with the Bolsheviks doing some pretty nasty things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rugger1869 Donating Member (71 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #16
31. Indeed.
Lenin and Trotsky advocated for a militant revolution, opposed to the incrementalism of the German Coummunists. Marx, for all that he's held up to be, was a philosopher that saw Capitalism for what it was. Nothing more, nothing less.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
socialist_n_TN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. Yep. And Lenin and Trotsky got the Bolsheviks
to power in Russia and the German incrementalists got Hitler to power in Germany. Things that make you go "Hmmm..."

The point is that the revolution doesn't have to be violent. It depends on what the capitalists do. Do they resist or give in to the inevitable? It's all on them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rugger1869 Donating Member (71 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #33
37. I agree
and we should be concerned about violence. It will come from the right. I have several long-time friend that have gone "righty" over the years. They collect guns and prepare for the "zombies." I'm afraid we may be the zombies they are talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
socialist_n_TN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. Well, I'm not advocating violence, but I've always been a
big believer in self defense. A lot of old school lefties are. We've got guns too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rugger1869 Donating Member (71 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. +1
I'm not advocating violence either. I just hope everyone is prepared.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #6
24. Where exactly does Hegelian evolution
Imply violent revolution? Yes, the Dialectic comes straight from Hegel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
white_wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Marx broke with Hegel though.
Hegel believed it was ideas that shaped the world, Marx believed the material world shaped ideas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Still the mechanism comes straight
From Hegel's theory of history. Neither call for violent revolution but rather evolution. That was the point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
7. Has he ever read the Communist Manifesto?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
white_wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I don't think Beck has read anything that isn't by Ayn Rand or Joseph Smith.
How he combines those two is beyond me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MisterP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #8
22. Cleon Skousen is the juncture
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeHereNow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #8
29. How do you know he CAN read? None of his followers can.
LOL!
BHN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
white_wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #29
44. Because unlike his followers Beck is actually rather smart.
He's made millions playing off the fears of people. He's a terrible excuse for a human being, but he isn't stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeHereNow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. I was making a joke... about his flock of true believers
I know he can read and yes he is smart.
Unfortunately he is also EVIL.
And that's no joke.
BHN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Puregonzo1188 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
9. SEIU and Code Pink caused the Egyptian revolution?
Crazy, crazy shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
white_wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Yeah I'm trying to figure that one out.
I also want to know why wealthy capitalist like George Soreos would be be backing a communist movement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
21. I thought that he (and other wingers) were saying that Muslim Brotherhood
was responsible for it? I'm getting confused. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #9
25. Those ladies sure travel
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
10. ...and give his site 'hits'? No thanks. I already know he's an idiot...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
12. Anyone not agreeing with him is a Marxist
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
13. Gah!
Marxism is a social science. That's like saying people living in gravity are all Newtonians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
white_wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. You know I have to admit.
Sometimes I was Beck was right, because then we'd have socialism by tomorrow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. That would be skipping a lot of steps.
It's slow going, but it's all grist for the mill. :) In a way, he is right, since response to economic crisis like this was written about extensively by Marx, et. al. but wrong in that the Marxists certainly didn't invent revolution and other progressive struggles, they examined them. And predicted them.

I think the country has made an amazing amount of progress in a few short weeks, but I don't think revolution per se will ever quite happen here unless there is a disaster (which would be bad). Our system of government is really pretty stable. But the power of people banding together to make their wants known has also had a long and effective tradition in this country. Even the New Deal didn't come about without massive actions in the streets.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
white_wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. I agree with your assessment.
I don't think we will see a true revolution will happen, but I do see a mass social-democrat party emerging in the next decade which will replace one of the two parties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
17. Beckkk is a small glob of santorum. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OffWithTheirHeads Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
19. This pic from Occupy Tucson pretty much sums it up.
It didn't come out as clear as I would have liked but...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
20. Oh Glenn
:eyes:

It's really saying something, when you lose your show on Fox News. Of course, after last November you had pretty much outlived your usefulness to them. C'est lavie!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
28. Glenn who?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
30. Everything out of these klowns' mouths sounds like the Swedish chef, if he were really really MEAN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
32. Either they are insignificant, whiney, smelly, hippies or Marxist revolutionaries. Can't have both.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MFrohike Donating Member (210 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
34. Ah, Beck
You keep talking like this, they're going to kick you off the internet too! When you're too crazy for Fox, it's time to voluntarily commit yourself, sir!

I guess Glenn thinks Marx started the class system. He probably thinks every king and baron (or equivalent) was really just an average middle class guy. It's like the Paulites, who are convinced the business cycle didn't exist prior to the Fed. I guess the people who lived through the multiple depressions of the 19th century were just imagining things.

Rambling, sorry. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
socialist_n_TN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
35. The only thing "Marxist" about the OWS protests
is the fact that they've made the connection between economics, politics, and power. That's the same connection that Marx (and others) have made. But that's it. BUT since this is a connection that the capitalists have tried to hide from the general public forEVER, then when a popular movement also makes this connection, it probably DOES appear Marxist to them.

I'm a Marxist and I know Marxists and Glenn, OWS isn't Marxist. Most Marxists I know are waiting for OWS to shit or get off the pot by, AT LEAST, naming the system that has caused that laundry list of abuses. When they NAME capitalism, then we can start talking about solutions and Marxist ones will come up. Until then, we'll watch things with interest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rugger1869 Donating Member (71 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
36. SS;DD

For the Republicans to drag out the same old moth-eaten scarecrow of "socialism" again in 1950--after having used it, or something very like it, in opposition to every progressive step the Nation has taken since 1933--is an insult to the intelligence of the American people. Out of the great progress of this country, out of our great advances in achieving a better life for all, out of our rise to world leadership, the Republican leaders have learned nothing. Confronted by the great record of this country, and the tremendous promise of its future, all they can croak is "socialism!"

- Harry S. Truman , 02/16/1950
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
39. Jeez, Glen. Exaggerate much?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #39
42. Oh, wait. I know why he's mad. The "Teabaggers" have not been able to make a funny & demeaning
Edited on Sun Oct-16-11 09:09 PM by Iris
nickname out of OWS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
workinclasszero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
41. There goes Glenny Beck pissing his pants and cryin like a two year old
It sells a lot of reich wing books apparently.:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
46. Is that dipshit still around?
I'm not clicking on his site. That'll give his sponsors more reason to continue sponsoring him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC