Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

the smoking gun

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 06:32 PM
Original message
the smoking gun
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Oceansaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Little Star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. LOL. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. Right "on target". n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
5. OH! NO! NO!! NO!!! BOTH SIDES DO IT!!!! WHERE"S OBAMA'S NAME, HUH?!!
(the preceding is a line of utter horseshit)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
6. K&R
:rofl:

That's just great.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
7. Right in our face smoking gun. Sometimes theytry to make an excuse, but
not often.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
8. Is there any evidence that they had any influence on Laughner? nt
Edited on Sun Jan-16-11 08:38 PM by doc03
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. No, none at all. Loughner lived in a cave 423 feet below the ground for the past 15 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. I think it made Democrats look silly when everyone went
off half-cocked blaming it on Palin and Beck before any facts were known. From what I have heard the guy was just mentally ill and politics had nothing to do with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cartach Donating Member (361 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #16
22. What segment of the population
do you think is most likely to listen to,condone and act in accordance with the hate and lies spewed out by the likes of Palin and Beck. First would be the mentally ill,next the sociopaths followed by the just plain ignorant . Those are the types that make up the biggest portion of their audiences so it doesn't take much to conclude that Loughner could well have been pushed over the edge by their rants. The mentally ill don't necessarily act out in a vacuum and outside sources do have an effect on their emotions and irrational thinking causing them to lose any semblance of control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 04:36 AM
Response to Reply #16
24. The gunman chose a purely political event for his rampage
Edited on Mon Jan-17-11 04:54 AM by liberation
So obviously that is proof of his actions not being politically motivated at all.

Do you really want to point fingers in regards of who is looking silly?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Action Donating Member (111 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #16
28. Nice Try
How long did it take for you to be brain washed by the right? Words have consequences. The right have been spreading hate for 40 years. What planet have you been living on? (google Lee Atwater if you are at a loss)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #28
56. Actually, a very poor try. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #16
29. Okay, let's look at the obvious here.
He opened fire at a political event. I'm not thinking that was a coincidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #29
34. He killed indiscriminantly at that event
At least two of the dead were Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bettyellen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #34
42. no, he went in and asked to see Giffords
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. Are you denying that in addition to shooting Rep. Giffords he murdered several people?
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bettyellen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #43
45. no, but you seem to be denying he targeted Giffords, as well as her supporters and constituents
Edited on Mon Jan-17-11 02:34 PM by bettyellen
and that is pretty wrong headed. it mattters not that there were a few Republicans among the overwhelmingly democratic group. He did specifically target a Dem representative, and her people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. Of course he targeted Giffords, but it's not at all clear why...
...Specifically, there isn't any evidence that he had it in for "liberals" or that his beef with Giffords had anything to do with her politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bettyellen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. so it was not indicriminate at all, thanks for correcting that fallacy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #47
49. No, he did both
Edited on Mon Jan-17-11 03:05 PM by slackmaster
Targeted one person (which I have never denied), AND killed indiscriminately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bettyellen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. i see, so he planned a massacre and only the first target mattered, got it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #50
51. Unknown and possibly unknowable
We don't know why he targeted Congresswoman Giffords, or why he shot all of those other people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bettyellen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #51
52. just as unknown that it was indiscriminate, and unlikely because he had obsessions w/ govt
and then went and directly targeted a member of the govt. that is known, as he left notes at home regarding asassination as well as asked for her by name just moments before opening fire.
i find your posts on this quite misleading, but perhaps you are speaking in ignorance, claiming it was completely random. the evidence contradicts this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #52
53. I have never claimed that it was "completely random"!
He targeted his representative in Congress.

We don't know exactly why.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bettyellen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #53
58. ":he killed indicriminately" sounds pretty random to me, and inaccurate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #58
59. Only if you choose to act obtusely and interpret that as a comprehensive description of the situa...
Edited on Mon Jan-17-11 03:50 PM by slackmaster
...tion.

Jared Loughner didn't bother checking the ideological credentials of most of the people he shot. He probably didn't even know the names of most of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bettyellen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #59
61. that was your "obtuse" little synopsis, not my fault it doesn;t accurately reflect the facts
or what you yourself believe.
and if this fella went to target a politician, which you and the police all agree he much decidely did, why would he need to check credentials of the other people there? it was a great place to find a group of people who were trying to work within the system of government- which he belived was evil. Kinda easy to see the connection.
did the guy who shot up th UU church two years ago screen for baptists? why would he- if there were any, they were willing to consort with the evil liberal UU people, so why would he want spare them? why would Giffords shooter want to spare those he believed were supporting something evil- the government.
both men targeted groups that had gathered for a purpose thet they vehemently were against. that they had mental problems that allowed them to resort to extreme violence doesn't change that at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #16
48. perhaps you heard wrong. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #16
55. "From what you heard"??? nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #8
33. He was breathing air that contained the "toxic atmosphere" they created
So it wouldn't make any difference if he had never seen or heard anything that any of those people have ever said or written.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #33
36. I am old enough to remember after the JFK assassination
people made a big fuss to take westerns off of TV and passed gun laws. Did it help? We still have murders today. I can buy a gun at a better price in West Virginia but I have to pay $35 to have it shipped to Ohio. How does this do anything other than put a tax on a law abiding citizen? What does the crook do? He breaks into someones home and steals his gun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
9. k&r....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
10. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
11. Wait - I thought guns were the problem and not words?
Which one is the real threat?

In the ME we have people using bombs to blow themselves up and all around them as well (but I am guessing those bombs and those actions are against the law).

Guns kill people, words kill people, ideals kill people, books kill people....or is it that people kill people as they have since time began?

Maybe the real problem is one that has no simple solution and trying to find a simple solution is also part of the problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlbertCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Maybe the real problem is
IGNORANCE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
13. Perfect
thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
14. Wow!! Hammer meet nail!!
Right on the money!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benld74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
17. VERY Well Done!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
18. K; R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
19. SBR?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
20. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alcibiades Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
21. When Rev Wright said "God damn America!"
Nothing happened. No rioting, no bloodshed, nothing. The fact that he said this in the context of denouncing a system of white supremacy so vile it was eventually disavowed by even George Wallace was of no consequence: he said it, had some connection to Barack Obama, and so it was therefore fretworthy.

But when a right-wing political outfit literally paints a crosshairs on the district of a sitting Democratic member of Congress, and a nutjob shoots her in the head, injuring many and killing six, including a little girl, there's no cause for concern.

If the president's pastor says something and nothing happens, it's proof of something dire. But if sarah Palin issues a fatwa and someone actually acts on it, it's no big whoop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 12:49 AM
Response to Original message
23. REC. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paka Donating Member (228 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 06:58 AM
Response to Original message
25. Smoking Gun...
Irae! You captured it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LawnKorn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
26. I thought Fox News was the fan rapidly dissipating the smoke from view
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LawnKorn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
27. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zax2me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
30. So the shooter was a bush hater?!
"His anger would well up at the sight of President George W. Bush"
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/16/us/16loughner.html?_r=3&adxnnl=1&pagewanted=3&adxnnlx=1295272816-mzPTbiXmgfYK5d56DmiDjg
He got this way by listening to limbaugh and palin and little beck?!

WAIT until all facts are in.
It really helps.
The shooter wasn't carrying a politial flag, left or right. He was just crazy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #30
54. Sorry, facts that contradict narcissistic liberal collective persecution theory aren't allowed
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
31. Is there some evidence
that Loughner specifically was listening to Limbaugh or watching Faux News? If there is, I sure haven't seen it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. None at all so far.
He appears to be a nut case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indydem Donating Member (866 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
35. Keep it up.
The more some of you make this about politics, the more this is going to kick our ass if he turns out to, in any whatsoever, be associated with progressives, liberals, or democrats.

"He became intrigued by antigovernment conspiracy theories, including that the Sept. 11 attacks were perpetrated by the government and that the country’s central banking system was enslaving its citizens. His anger would well up at the sight of President George W. Bush, or in discussing what he considered to be the nefarious designs of government."

If you honestly think the right wing corporate media won't start spinning this RIGHT NOW that loughner was actually one of US, you are naive.

He was a nutcase. Not a liberal or conservative. Keep spinning this into the fault of the right wing and we will all be sorry.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/16/us/16loughner.html?ref=us
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
russspeakeasy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
37. Great creativity. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vicarofrevelwood Donating Member (190 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
38. King Henry II said in the 12th century
Who will rid me of this meddlesome priest," King Henry II
said in the 12th century in front of several of his knights,
who took him at his word and slew Thomas Becket. 
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrMickeysMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
39. Hah-hah!
Fox News CLIP!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demwing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. Then Bachman and Angle are Butts! /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demwing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
40. To say that people who incite hate aren't responsible for increasing violence
Edited on Mon Jan-17-11 01:54 PM by demwing
is to say that Cigarette manufacturers aren't responsible for increasing cancer, and that second hand smoke is the sole responsibility of the smoker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #40
44. Cigarette manufacturers aren't responsible for all types of cancer
For example, nobody has linked cigarette smoking to melanoma.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demwing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #44
57. Why are you refuting something I did not say?
I'm really curious...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #57
60. All violence is not the product of people inciting violence
Is that easier to understand?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quarbis Donating Member (235 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #60
62. the military teaches
if you demonize your enemy long and hard enough
it becomes easy to kill them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demwing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #60
64. The only person bringing the word "All" into our conversation
Edited on Mon Jan-17-11 05:41 PM by demwing
is you. That, I understand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oberliner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
63. Allen West?
Anyone else have to look up who that guy was?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demwing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #63
65. wingnut Congressman from Florida
22nd district I think

but I only know of him because I live down here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oberliner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #65
68. Got it - just didn't realize he was so prominent
Edited on Mon Jan-17-11 06:32 PM by oberliner
Certainly heard a lot more about the rest of that motley crew than about him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demwing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #68
69. He's a Tea Party Favorite
and refers to the Obama administration as "tyrants."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
japple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
66. Bet that hurt Ann Coulter's feelings--left off her name n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoccoR5955 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
67. K & R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
70. K and R
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 01:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC