Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

My partner and I talked about employment last night...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 10:16 PM
Original message
My partner and I talked about employment last night...
and he came up with a really interesting idea...
In exchange for yearly tuition to college or trade school(because the nation needs everything!),the student would devote 2 years to the country kind of like the conservation corp or The New deal type programs.This would include a living wage and health benefits.at the end of this tour of duty,the individual could choose to leave and go into private industry,or remain and serve the nation by teaching/creating/etc.
This could be subsidized by sharply decreasing our overseas presence and reintegrating the vets and other unemployed in these areas.

he also stated that vacant housing could be subsidized by the government and used by those in these programs to live in.that would benefit places like detroit and others who need large infrastructure rebuilding projects.

What do you think?Would it work?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
littlewolf Donating Member (920 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. hmm 2 years total ... or
2 years per year of tuition???
so 4 years college = 8 years svc???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. What would be fair,to you? seriously...
I haven't really decided myself.
the 2 year program would allow people to get experience.
8 years would probably be unrealistic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
littlewolf Donating Member (920 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. 8 years would push more people into a trade school
which is 18 months - 24 months ....

also you can get 4 years of college quicker ... you just don't fart around
enjoying the "college experience"

I am not sure ...
it would depend on how bad someone wanted to
get 4 years of school ...
there are lots of state and federal money
(or at least there was .. havnt looked in a while)
and there is always the military
and they have revamped the GI bill
so that it actually pays....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. Required National Service..... in other words, reinstate the draft, and those who don't honestly
believe in serving in the military would have the option of filing for CO status, and having a program like this.

Give poor kids a REAL alternative to volunteering for the military!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. americorp
has a $4500 tuition credit for one year of service. you get a small stipend, and a public transit pass.
my son did this, tutoring in a university of chicago charter school. funny that it was the charter schools that wanted these kids and not the common schools, but that is a different thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. It wasn't "funny" at all. It was cheap, government-paid labor for charter schools.
Real schools hire aides, & train them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. real schools don't have enough aides, but
teachers unions keep volunteers out. even volunteer parents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeff47 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
7. Perhaps you could explain how it would help?
What, exactly, are you trying to solve? High unemployment? Then why do the school part? Just pay 'em like the WPA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. exactly.It would help unemployment,education and infrastructure
Edited on Mon Jan-17-11 12:39 AM by w8liftinglady
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeff47 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Actually, it wouldn't
Edited on Mon Jan-17-11 01:05 AM by jeff47
Which is why I was asking what you were aiming for.

It would help unemployment, in that previously-unemployed would have a job. If said job happens to be building infrastructure, then it would help infrastructure.

It would devastate education.

First, there is not currently a shortage of students who want to go to school. Making school suddenly more available without creating new schools drives the price up. And higher education costs are already absurd.

Second, you suggestion creates a massive number of low-paid teachers. "low-paid" even in relation to teachers. They'll massively drive the wages for teachers down, which will result in driving away people who actually want to teach. You'll be left with a workforce that only gives a damn about paying off their debt and getting on to a decent paying job. Those 'teachers' will not be very effective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 02:57 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. what would be a beneficial plan?
I am interested in stimulating people to obtain an education and get more folks back to work.how can we accomplish that?
I don't know about the rest of the nation,but in texas many teachers who want to work can't...their positions have been eliminated due to cutbacks.
My partner , being an educator and union member,felt this might be beneficial for both the student and the teacher.How can we encourage states to re-employ teachers with seniority?
In Texas,there is a large student population who would benefit from this type of program.The state would benefit.The only things that might not benefit are industries who currently are profitting from overseas aggression.This might enable them to focus on stateside creation of jobs.

There has to be some kind of solution.We were simply discussing.what kinds of suggestions can you think of?I'm all ears!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K8-EEE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 01:24 AM
Response to Original message
10. Isn't that how they do it in Israel?
Also in Spain I think, (from my relatives) that if you want to go to a public U you are expected to do govmt or army service? Or you can go to a super expensivo private college and not do anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC