Environmental group questions safety of gulf seafood

[ensho]

http://floridaindependent.com/52686/natural-resources-defense-council-gulf-seafood-safety


-snip-

Just last week, the Natural Resources Defense Council, a nonpartisan environmental advocacy group, filed a petition with the FDA, demanding that the agency “recognize the hazards posed by PAHs in seafood and set a health protective standard.” PAHs, or Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons, are pollutants that have been shown to cause cancer in both animals and humans. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, they usually don’t dissolve easily in water and have been shown to cause higher rates of birth defects and lower body weights in mice.

According to the NRDC, the problem isn’t that the seafood isn’t being tested, but rather that the FDA isn’t testing it well enough. As blogged by the NRDC’s Miriam Rotkin-Ellman and Dr. Gina Solomon, the FDA has failed to properly assess levels of PAHs in gulf seafood in six major ways. According to Rotkin-Ellman, the FDA:

•assumed everyone weighs 176 pounds,
•underestimated the amount of seafood consumed by Gulf Coast residents,
•ignored the cancer risk from naphthalene,
•failed to address the increased vulnerability of pregnant women and children,
•allowed for a high cancer risk,
•and assumed that the contamination will only last five years.

-snip-

In addition to undergoing tests by the FDA, some Florida seafood has also been tested by the state Department of Agriculture’s Division of Food Safety, and Agriculture Commissioner Adam Putnam has repeatedly said that gulf seafood is safe. Just last month, the department launched an online training program for Florida restaurant workers to learn to answer common questions about the safety of gulf seafood.
-snip-
----------------------

training restaurant workers to spread propaganda????

[FarCenter]

1. Can't afford to eat it often enough for it to be a problem

[ensho]

2. so therefore you don't care?

nt