Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mother****ing Marlboros on a mother****ing plane: Intoxicated bathroom smoker faces criminal charges

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 10:16 AM
Original message
Mother****ing Marlboros on a mother****ing plane: Intoxicated bathroom smoker faces criminal charges
(CNN) -- A brawling smoker who turned his trans-Atlantic flight from France into something resembling a bar fight is facing criminal charges.

Franck Lebrun was on a Delta Air Lines flight from Nice, France, to New York last Saturday when things became tense, according to a complaint filed at the U.S. District Court in New York.

During the flight, the crew suspected that someone had been smoking cigarettes in one of the lavatories. Other passengers said it was Lebrun, so the crew confronted him once, and then a second time when he again headed for the bathroom. Lebrun looked intoxicated and smelled of cigarettes and alcohol, according to the complaint.

He then approached a flight attendant "in an aggressive manner" and pushed her away, according to the complaint. When she told him not to touch her, Lebrun pushed her away again, court papers say.

http://www.cnn.com/2011/TRAVEL/01/14/unruly.passenger.delta/index.html?hpt=Sbin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. Good.
I'd have made him sit on the wing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. They did!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinboy3niner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. LOL!
A classic! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
2. Slightly off topic but ... cancel the F**** Air Marshall program.
Edited on Mon Jan-17-11 10:19 AM by Statistical
After more tense moments, a federal air marshal identified himself to Lebrun and told him to return to his seat.
As Lebrun walked toward the back of the plane "he continued to shout and waive his arms in an excited manner," according to the complaint.
Two other air marshals identified themselves to Lebrun and asked him to show his passport.

--------------

Three fucking Air Marshalls on the same damn flight. Really? Oh yeah happens to be a flight going to Paris. Imagine that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Actually, it was FROM France (Nice) and the marshalls did exactly what they're supposed to do.
I'd have been glad they were there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. I couldn't agree more, and I suspect most of the passengers on that plane were glad also /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Less than 5% of flights have any air marhsall and you don't think it was suspicious
Edited on Mon Jan-17-11 10:28 AM by Statistical
that there happened to be three coming from a vacation/resort location on the same flight?

95% of flights have no air marshalls at all but this flight had three.

I bet you won't find 3 airmarshalls on the red eye to Madison, WI in the middle of January.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pipi_k Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. Just because they identified themselves
as Air Marshals, that doesn't mean they were on that plane in a professional capacity at the time.

One of my sons-in-law just became a US Marshal in December. He had to take a plane from GA to MA to pick up his wife and their belongings for the drive down to their new home in TX, where he has been assigned.

He was probably not the only Marshal on that plane that day. He wasn't on it for business, but if any trouble erupted, he would be obligated to identify himself before trying to quell a disturbance, etc.


In fact, when he and his wife got on the plane to come back this way, he was waved through security while my stepdaughter had to go through the whole process. When they got on board the plane they were immediately taken to meet the pilot, who said, "We're glad to have you aboard, sir"....after which they were seated right up front.


I don't see anything strange about there being three Air Marshals on a flight from Paris....or anywhere, really. Could have been coincidence. In any case, I'll bet the airline crews are pretty happy to have any Marshal aboard for any reason...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
distantearlywarning Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. If I were on a flight with a belligerent drunk passenger
I would be happy to have one or more air marshals on board to deal with the issue.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Except there are so few airmarshalls that 95% of flights have none.
Edited on Mon Jan-17-11 10:44 AM by Statistical
That includes every single flight involving terrorists.
911 - no marshalls on any of the 4 flights.
Shoe bomber - no marshalls
Underwear bomber - no marhsalls

Actually since the program began in 1970 the Air Marhsall program hasn't stopped a single terrorist attack nor has it detained a single terrorist.

However we have 3 Air Mashalls on the exact same flight coming back from a nice tourist location.
The Air Marshall program is corrupt from the top down and this is just more evidence.

The 95%* is likely best case scenario

"Although the actual number of air marshals is classified, it has been widely reported that the number of air marshals covering 28,000 flights per day is fewer than 4,000. Even with a generous calculation, the marshals only cover 5 percent of flights, according to CNN assessments."
http://www.cnn.com/2010/US/02/04/air.marshals.program/index.html#cnnSTCText

When you start putting 2 or 3 marshalls on the same flight the coverage is even less maybe. 2% or 1% of flights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NuclearDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
4. Guess it really is time to open some f***ing windows
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SOS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
7. Airlines...
They sell hard liquor to the passenger and are then surprised and angry when the passenger is drunk, belligerent and smokin' in the boys room.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mariana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #7
14. They make a lot of money selling that overpriced booze.
They're hardly likely to give that up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pintobean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
8. We need a smoking lounge (forum)
My tongue is in my cheek.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC