Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

First thing: Separate investment banking from regular banking

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
MrScorpio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-11 11:32 AM
Original message
First thing: Separate investment banking from regular banking
Combining the two has always been a shit sandwich for the little guy… And even some of the banks suffered as well because of this turkey.

I'd start there.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-11 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. create some criminal statutes for fraud which would include
actions like the banks did telling investors one thing and saying something else internally
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrScorpio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-11 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Put some teeth in the SEC..
And sic 'em on the offenders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-11 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
2. Un-repeal the Glass-Steagall Act?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-11 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yep
It was stupid to repeal G-S.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-11 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. Not so much stupid as calculatedly evil.
Greedy $&#*@(^ pigs. They knew why it was necessary in the first place, but they just had to have their own Gilded Age.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrScorpio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-11 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. That's a bingo!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-11 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. that may have been a contributing factor but it wasn't the direct cause
safety and soundness by itself should have been sufficient IFF the regulators had been doing their jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MilesColtrane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-11 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. It was, however, the direct cause of the taxpayer bailout.
Few would care if we lost some investment banks and the commercial banks were left standing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-11 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Precisely. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarCenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-11 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Investment banks held many money market fund accounts
This started with the Merrill Lynch Cash Management Account, the Dreyfus Money Market Fund and others decades ago.

Lots of individuals and most business held funds in MMFs because the drew interest at short term rates, while still providing ready access to the money.

Had the investment banks gone down, the MMFs would have been unavailable, and business in the US would have stopped. In fact, one MMF that served businesses did "break the buck" and a run started before Treasury stepped in and guaranteed balances in the MMFs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-11 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
6. Yes, but rich people get richer from it, and making rich people richer is the most important thing
in the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarCenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-11 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
8. Most of the housing bubble and mortgage mess was created by non-banks -- GS would not apply
Edited on Thu Oct-20-11 12:02 PM by FarCenter
Lehman Brothers, Bear Stearns, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Merrill Lynch, CountryWide, GE Capital, Golden West, IndyMac, WaMu, GMAC, AIG, CIT and others were either investment banks only, or they were thrifts, or they were non-bank financial institutions.

None of the above were banks before the end of 2008 when they had either been merged into banks under the urging of the US Government in order to rescue them or had converted at least part of their corporation to a bank in order to access the Federal Reserve discount window to get loans.

Citigroup was really the only go-go player bank in the mortgage market during the bubble, and wholesaled a lot of mortgages into bad mortgage backed securities.

The JP Morgan investment bank did securitization, but mainly Chase and ex Bank One mortgages. The bad stuff in their portfolio mainly comes from Bear Stearns and WaMu.

Bank of America's bad stuff is mostly from CountryWide and Merrill Lynch.

Wells Fargo's bad stuff is mostly from Golden West via the Wachovia Merger, although both they and BofA have extra losses from having large operations in non-recourse mortgage states like CA, AZ, NV and FL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
banned from Kos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-11 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Exactly --- you know your mortgage crisis
also, Canada has no G-S and had no mortgage crisis.

Lack of G-S is the left's CRA scapegoat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC