Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ohio and Wisconsin lose high-speed rail funding.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Swede Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 01:41 PM
Original message
Ohio and Wisconsin lose high-speed rail funding.
Edited on Thu Dec-16-10 01:42 PM by Swede
Citing two incoming governors' opposition to high-speed rail projects in the Midwest, Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood redirected $810 million away from Wisconsin and $400 million from Ohio to other states. California is getting the lion's share, $624 million for its link between Los Angeles and San Francisco. $342 million is going to Florida with the remainder divided among Washington and 10 other states.

Is the U.S. turning a corner on high-speed rail?

Along with the money comes jobs. In Wisconsin, the outgoing governor Jim Doyle claimed over 4,700 jobs directly related to the high-speed rail line between Milwaukee and Madison would have been realized at the height of construction.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/US/12/15/high.speed.rail/index.html?hpt=C2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. John Kasich hasn't even took office yet and he has cost us
$400 million and thousands of jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
T Wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. The "power of the purse" must be used to redirect as much funding as possible from the parasitic red
states toward the productive blue ones.

If it can also be used to provide consequences for stupid electoral decision-making by the voters in a state, so much the better.

The pukes do not want to pay taxes. Fine. Let them do without the funds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Oh, yeah, that's right,
Punish everybody in those states, that's so compassionate:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. Good. Now please give that money to the states who have asked for it. Nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. Thank you, WI and OH.
Now get those boobs out of office next time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. How short peoples memories are, before this recession
Ted Strickland was one of the most popular Governors in the USA. He followed one of the most corrupt and incompetent Governors in Ohio history that was actually convicted of a felony. Then two short years after he gets swept out of office by one of the very people that engineered the recession.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. What gov. elect Walker has already done to Wisconsin:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x48

A gift at the expense of Wisconsin from Walker: $624 million to California, $342.2 million to Florida, $161.5 million to Washington, and a paltry $42.3 million to Illinois. Goodbye to thousands of jobs as well. Yes, and as the editorial stated, some of that money did come from Wisconsin taxpayers as well. It's going to be a long 6 years here with this guy and the nutjob who beat Feingold.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kennah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
6. Shifting the money to those who really want it ...
... only makes sense.

I applaud and welcome more HSR, but I have trouble with the term high speed rail applied when we're only talking 110 MPH. To be sure, some of the corridors will hit speeds upwards of 220 MPH; however, I think there's going to be a lot of buyer's remorse when people realize we're only talking about 110 MPH along some stretches of track.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC