Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Iraq War is Finally Over. And It Marks a Complete Neocon Defeat

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-11 03:15 PM
Original message
The Iraq War is Finally Over. And It Marks a Complete Neocon Defeat


The Iraq War is Finally Over. And It Marks a Complete Neocon Defeat
Thanks to the toppling of Saddam Hussein, Iran's greatest enemy, Tehran's influence in Iraq is stronger than America's
by Jonathan Steele
October 23, 2011


The president put a brave face on it, claiming he was fulfilling an election promise to end the war, though he had actually been supporting the Pentagon's effort to make a deal with Iraq's prime minister Nouri al-Maliki to keep US bases and several thousand troops there indefinitely.

The talks broke down because Moqtada al-Sadr's members of parliament and other Iraqi nationalists insisted that US troops be subject to Iraqi law. In every country where they are based the US insists on legal immunity and refuses to let troops be tried by foreigners. In Iraq the issue is especially sensitive after numerous US murders of civilians and the Abu Ghraib scandal in which Iraqi prisoners were sexually humiliated. In almost every case where US courts tried US troops, soldiers were acquitted or received relatively brief prison sentences.

The final troop withdrawal marks a complete defeat for Bush's Iraq project. The neocons' grand plan to use the 2003 invasion to turn the country into a secure pro-western democracy and a garrison for US bases that could put pressure on Syria and Iran lies in tatters.

Their hopes of making Iraq a democratic model for the Middle East have been tipped on their head. The instability and bloodshed which the US unleashed in Iraq were the example that Arabs sought to avoid, not emulate. This year's autonomous surge for democracy in Egypt and Tunisia has done far more to galvanize the region and undermine its dictatorships than anything the US did in Iraq. And when the Arab spring dawned, the Iraqi government found itself on the defensive as demonstrators took to the streets of Baghdad and Basra to protest against Maliki's authoritarianism and his government's US-supported clampdown on trade union activity. Maliki hosted two Syrian government delegations this summer and has refused to criticize Bashar al-Assad's shooting of protesters.

Read the full article at:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2011/oct/23/us-withdrawal-iraq-defeat-bush-neocons
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sibelian Donating Member (543 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-11 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think Halliburton did rather well, actually...

although the whole mess seems to have left the Republican part in tatters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-11 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The military industrial complex are the big winners. Also, the fascists got a lot of horrible
legislation passed thanks to Little Bush's War.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sibelian Donating Member (543 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-11 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. ... agree, and with other benefits

namely, a carefully boxed off left wing. Alhtough it looks like that is beginning to change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sad sally Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-11 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. The "instability and bloodshed which the US unleashed in Iraq"
won't end any time soon; US arms manufacturers will see to that.

Iraq – Howitzer Ammunition

WASHINGTON, Oct. 14, 2011 – The Defense Security Cooperation Agency notified Congress Oct 5 of a
possible Foreign Military Sale to the Government of Iraq for various explosive projectiles and charges, as well
as associated equipment, parts, training and logistical support for an estimated cost of $82 million.

The Government of Iraq has requested a possible sale of 44,608 M107 155mm High Explosive Projectiles and
9,328 M485A2 155mm Illumination projectiles; also included are, M231 Propelling charges, M232A1 155mm
Modular Artillery Charge System Propelling charges, M739 Fuzes, M762A1 Electronic Time Fuzes, M82
Percussion primers, M767A1 Electronic Time Fuzes, 20-foot Intermodal Containers for transporting
ammunition, publications and technical data, personnel training and training equipment, U.S. Government and
contractor engineering, logistics, and technical support services, and other related elements of logistics support.
The estimated cost is $82 million.

This proposed sale will contribute to the foreign policy and national security of the United States by helping to
improve the security of a friendly country. This proposed sale directly supports the Iraq government and serves
the interests of the Iraqi people and the U.S.

The proposed sale will help Iraq’s efforts to develop an integrated ground defense capability, a strong national
defense, and dedicated military force. As the drawdown of coalition forces continues, the Iraqi military
continues to develop a force capable of assuming the lead in providing for the security of the Iraqi people.

http://www.dsca.osd.mil/PressReleases/36-b/2011/Iraq_11-35.pdf?du
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bigmack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-11 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. The neocons can't lose....
They just say how wonderful things could have been if we had followed their plan. Only a few of us know their plan, so they are safe in simply saying they were right, and Obama fucked it up.

"Obama LOST Iraq"

pretty soon...

"Obama LOST Afghanistan"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-11 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Bu$h the lesser lost Iraq when he cut off the head of the government and
disbanded the Republican Guard.

Obama's mistake was not working to getting out as a first priority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarCenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-11 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
6. Its a neocon setback, but defeat would be the removal of the Jordanian Monarchy
At World Economic Forum, Arab Spring looms large
October 23, 2011 09:37
DEAD SEA, Jordan — There is a frisson of crisis in the air here as a thousand people from more than 50 countries meet to discuss the economic realities of the Arab Spring, under the auspices of the World Economic Forum.

Sleek sheikhs, bespoke-suited businessmen, a few women, diplomats, government ministers and a couple of kings have come to the lowest place on earth to take part in the Forum’s “Special Meeting on Economic Growth and Job Creation in the Arab World.”

King Abdullah II of Jordan is the official host, and he welcomed his fellow monarch, King Juan Carlos of Spain.

It seemed fitting that the latter would be here, given that the Arabs ruled Spain until they were expelled in 1492, and the influence of these Andalusian refugees can be seen in the culture and architecture of North Africa to this day.

The twin deaths of Col. Muammar Gaddafi and Sultan bin Abdul Aziz Al Saud, the crown prince of Saudi Arabia, hang over these discussions: the one welcomed, the other regretted, adding to the uncertainties of these tumultuous times.

...

So despite all the joy over the death of Gaddafi, there is fear here, fear that the expectations of youths cannot be adequately fulfilled. Fear that, now that the tyrants have gone, the governments that follow will not be able to survive in a sea of troubles.

Could the Arab Spring turn into a World Spring, one delegate wanted to know? Is a new depression going to cause uprisings everywhere?

“It could all go quite well,” said another delegate of the Arab Spring, “or it could all go horribly wrong.”

http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/opinion/columnists/111022/at-world-economic-forum-arab-spring-looms-large
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrTriumph Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-11 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
7. Wait a minute. Just how much will we be paying mercenaries to stay?
x
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarCenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-11 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. As of March '10, there were about 95.5 K DoD contractors in Iraq
Of these, only 11.6 K were private security contractors.

25% of the total contractors were US Citizens. Very few of the private security contractors were US citizens.

Contractors in Iraq lost immunity at the end of '08.

I'd bet that the numbers will be a lot smaller in March '12.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sad sally Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-11 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. From this report, looks like those mercenaries might have their hands full.
Baghdad (NINA) – Muqtada Al Sadr, leader of the Sadr Trend, considered all US embassy employees in Baghdad as “occupiers”, stressing that resisting them after 2011 is an obligation.

In response to a query of one of his followers about the increase of the embassy employees' number from 5000 to 15000 after the expiry of SOFA, Muqtada said “they are all occupiers and resisting them after the end of the agreement is an obligation.” /End/

http://www.ninanews.com/english/News_Details.asp?ar95_VQ=FIJFLG?du
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-11 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Yep, the jig is up
and the contractors are going to have to start bugging out, too. It was a profitable experience for their bosses, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-11 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
11. The only problem is
when it all goes to hell in a handbasket next year, it won't be blamed on Bush. If President Obama had ordered a quick withdrawl on January 21, 2009, he probably wouldn't get the blame for the shitstorm that would have (and will have) happened anyway. But, we stayed longer, spent more money on toys that the various Iraqi factions will use against each other, and lost more lives on this Vietnam, part II.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hulka38 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-11 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
13. and yet the neocons are beating the drum on Iran ever louder.
It seems to me that they have hardly been discredited and remain as bold as ever after the Iraq debacle. I blame the Democratic Party establishment for co-opting and legitimizing much of the neocon agenda instead of exposing it for its lies and destruction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC