Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Behind the vaccine panic

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
SpartanDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 06:47 PM
Original message
Behind the vaccine panic
The anti-vaccine crusade remains one of the enduring, heart-rending mysteries of our young century. Despite all reasonable evidence showing that failing to vaccinate children puts them at enormous risk, an astonishing number of parents hold off anyway because of scientifically unproven fears that it could lead to the onset of autism or other conditions. More mystifying still: The parents susceptible to vaccine conspiracy theories often are well-educated, liberal-minded denizens -- people just like Salon readers -- in upscale areas like Marin County, Calif., which has the fifth-highest average-per-capita income in the U.S., but whose parents bypass vaccines at three times the rate of the rest of the state; or in Ashland, Ore., where the exemption rate is an astounding 30 percent.

In "The Panic Virus," journalist Seth Mnookin gives a gripping, authoritative account of how the anti-vaccine crusades caught on, shining a bright light on Andrew Wakefield, the now disgraced British researcher whose early work claiming a link between vaccines and autism created a global stir, and authors like David Kirby ("Evidence of Harm") and celebrities like Jenny McCarthy, who hyped the shocking connection long after it had been debunked and Wakefield denounced. (The denouncements continue; this month, the British Medical Journal accused Wakefield of an elaborate fraud.).

You document how the anti-vaccine movement in this country has taken on particular energy with affluent people, in intelligent, liberal communities. Why do they seem the most susceptible to believing the myths about vaccines?

I think it sort of hits a lot of issues that make instinctive sense to more liberal, well-educated people. It's not difficult for me to imagine that pharmaceutical companies do not always have my best interests at heart. Similarly, that big businesses are able to manipulate the governmental profits, manipulate lawmakers in order to effect policies that may not be in my best interest. So I think those are two things that come into play here a lot. And the narrative of parents and children being taken advantage of and being harmed by big business, by big corporations, is a very compelling one. You don't see a lot of movies about the sympathetic drug company.

http://www.salon.com/news/autism/index.html?story=/mwt/feature/2011/01/16/seth_mnookin_panic_virus_autism



The panic was in away in a perfecrt storm it'd played on the not unfounded fear that company would put profit for people. But also peoples lack of experience with widespread childhood diease
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. In the U.S. there's never been a "vaccine panic."
Look at the statistics -- we've been at over a 90% vaccination rate for years, compared to in the 60's during the 1980's. So our vaccine rate actually went UP after the uproar about the now-discredited Wakefield research. The CDC is very happy with our vaccine rate and considers it a success.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. +100. The only "panic" is the panic-mongering of pharmacorps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. It does seem that way. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. i posted the cdc's vaccination rates for measles once, by year, to counter that panic-mongering &
it got promptly moved to the "woo" forum.

the cdc's own numbers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Someone else recently posted the stats for all the vaccines,
over a period of 20 or 30 years, and they all went up by about 50% over the period from the 1980's till now. You're right, we've had anything but a panic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoneOffShore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. What's been your experience with MMR?
Have you seen what happens when children aren't vaccinated?

Do you remember the time before polio vaccine? People dying or crippled. Children in "iron lungs".

Do you remember the time before smallpox vaccine?

Tell us about the golden age before vaccines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 04:11 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. Polio and smallpox were devastating, to be sure.
But people my age had measles, mumps, and rubella when they were considered normal childhood diseases with rare serious effects (except, in the case of rubella, if acquired by a pregnant woman) -- probably because there was no vaccine available. Once the vaccine was approved we were suddenly taught to view all those diseases as very serious. I don't remember being very sick with any of those illnesses; but I do remember being itchy with chicken pox.

Still, I got the MMR vaccine for my children -- but not because I considered those diseases to be on a par with polio, smallpox, tetanus, or pertussis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 04:15 AM
Response to Reply #9
16. what does any of that have to do with what i posted?
Edited on Tue Jan-18-11 04:16 AM by Hannah Bell
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 04:14 AM
Response to Reply #2
15. That's ridiculous. What value for "pharmacorps" is there in "panic mongering" re: Kids vaccines?
Edited on Tue Jan-18-11 04:16 AM by Warren DeMontague
Your statement is logically empty.

If there are people who are NOT going to get their kids vaccinated because of the anti-vax bullshit, then there IS a panic.

If there ISN'T a panic, then folks aren't listening to the anti-vax bullshit, so they're getting their kids vaccinated anyway, so what would the point be of the "pharmacorps" mongering a panic? Would parents get their kids vaccinated twice?

It doesn't make any sense. But, then, you have kids getting whooping cough because, "panic" or no, some idiots listened to Jenny McCarthy and didn't get their kids vaccinated against easily preventable diseases.

I'd like some of the anti-vax woo peddlers to talk to my aunt with Post-Polio Syndrome. Enough, already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 04:17 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. the fact is that a larger percent of the school-age population is vaccinated than ever before,
Edited on Tue Jan-18-11 04:25 AM by Hannah Bell
by cdc's own figures.

so the handwringing about how hordes of kids aren't getting vaccinated is crapola.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=222&topic_id=42427&mesg_id=42427
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 04:20 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. Great, then everyone is in agreement.
Still, what possible profit motive would the "pharmacorps" have in trying to convince people to vaccinate who were all going to do it anyway? Seems like sort of a waste of all that dark sith corporo-energy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 04:24 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. what's your explanation for the media articles leaving the impression that decreasing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 04:28 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. It's a regional phenomena, and it's real. Your statistics are national, and I think several good
points are raised in response in the thread. I don't need to delineate them, or post the links, again.

Like I said, if everyone is on the same page, great. People realize that it's fucking lunacy to not vaccinate against potentially dangerous diseases.

But I'm still not clear as to what possible motive (again, presumably profit) the dreaded "pharmacorps" would have in scaring people into vaccinating when they're all doing it anyway. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 05:43 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. it isn't painted as a regional phenomenon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpartanDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. It might not have been widespread
but it did cause a panic in some corners when 30% of parents in Marin Country aren't getting their kids vacinated I'd say that is a panic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Whatever that panic was it never made a dent in CA's annual figures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheMadMonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 01:45 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. No because it's one of the few places where the "welfare state" is permitted...
...to function unhindered in the USA. To be a welfare recipeint, your kid has to have all the scheduled vaccinations or the "free government money" stops arriving. For the poor, even compulsory schooling can be made dependent on "voluntary" vaccination.

With 100% (or near as damned) vaccination there, there is a LOT of room for others independent of the welfare system to "conscientiously object" without skewing the national numbers whilst still driving local numbers well below the herd immunity threshold.

Exactly what "annual figures" are you refering to? Infection (and death) rates for most of the nasty diseases we routinely vaccinate against are on the rise in many locales because vaccination percentages are falling below the levels needed for herd immunity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 04:01 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. No they're not. Last summer the CDC held a press conference
Edited on Tue Jan-18-11 04:03 AM by pnwmom
congratulating themselves on maintaining very high coverage on all children's vaccines -- over 90%. And the numbers have increased by 50% since the 1980's.

HOWEVER, they did acknowledge the rising numbers of pertussis cases in California. But they said that wasn't caused by lower levels of infant/toddler vaccinations -- it was caused by the fact that immunity from the young children's vaccines wears off by the teens, and so previously vaccinated teens and adults were losing their immunity and spreading infection to babies too young to get vaccines. So what they are trying to encourage now is for more teens and adults to get the new pertussis booster vaccine that has been developed for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 04:22 AM
Response to Reply #11
19. cdc's data on vaccination rates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam kane Donating Member (326 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. +101. Phony "panic."
Who wants thiomersal in their veins, anyway? It is a known toxin and completely unnecessary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
7. "Myths about vaccines" can't be separated from the companies who produce them....
and their salesmanship -- and their reputations which aren't good -

In other words, drug companies' own behavior works to defeat their alleged merit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 04:11 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. "alleged merit"... that's rich.
Sort of like the "alleged moon landings", right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BzaDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 04:37 AM
Response to Reply #7
22. Is the Earth "allegedly round" as well? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Well, you might ask Galileo -- or the Vatican ... ? Two sides to every myth -- ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
25. My nephew got whooping cough two months ago
Strong lil guy was in bed for two weeks. Better now.

Funny, he survived two years in a third world country while his dad was posted overseas. No harm.

Then he moves to Boulder, Colorado. In a few months he gets an easily preventable disease, just because a lot of his classmates were not given their whooping cough vaccine because of their stupid parents. He did get vaccinated, just failed to provide immunity. It happens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC