eppur_se_muova
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-25-11 11:11 AM
Original message |
Funniest headline EVER !1! |
Warpy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-25-11 11:12 AM
Response to Original message |
1. They are a bunch of characters, all right |
|
and once they've been safely trounced, we can all afford to laugh at them.
For now, I'm appalled. I just wonder what my parents would have made of that lineup of lunatics.
|
Scuba
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-25-11 11:27 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Funny, sad, disgusting - all at once. Hard to believe ... |
|
... any of these idiots, fanatics and con artists is considered serious Presidential material.
|
woo me with science
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-25-11 11:29 AM
Response to Original message |
3. Cartoon characters, maybe. nt |
AsahinaKimi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-25-11 11:35 AM
Response to Original message |
4. I think thats a misprint ..probably should read |
|
GOP primary now a contest of chowderheads...
|
sarge43
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-25-11 11:38 AM
Response to Original message |
5. Character!? They said character. |
treestar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-25-11 11:39 AM
Response to Original message |
6. The Greatest Character |
|
for screwing the people, I guess.
:rofl:
|
dogknob
(310 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-25-11 12:12 PM
Response to Original message |
|
The reigning champ for me happened during the Monica scandal and appeared in the San Francisco Chronicle: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/Chronicle/a/1998/02/07/MN22072.DTL">"Clinton Holds His Own..." Then there was that article in the WSJ about Fruit of the Loom's "Fortunes sagging under a heavy debt load."
|
Jim Lane
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-25-11 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
9. My own personal favorite |
|
In 1980, liberal New York elected a thuggish and corrupt right-wing Republican, Al D'Amato, to the U.S. Senate. (This happened through the idiocy of third-party politics, with two liberals splitting the vote and D'Amato winning with a plurality.) Three years later, The New York Times ran a story about him. The headline: .
Everyone I know thought this was an unjustified smear. D'Amato was certainly smart enough to know that cash would harder to trace.
|
barbtries
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-25-11 03:34 PM
Response to Original message |
|
what the cartoonists do with that one. it did make me laugh.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:43 PM
Response to Original message |