Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What Did We Expect? When Every Year A Corp Has To Make More $'s Then The Preceding One....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
global1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-11 09:00 AM
Original message
What Did We Expect? When Every Year A Corp Has To Make More $'s Then The Preceding One....
This to me is the fault of Wall Street. It forces Corps to find ways to squeeze profits out & raise prices; outsource jobs overseas; reduce the size of product & charge the same or more for it; etc. All at the same time they find ways to short their employees on wages & benefits. Once we're on such a cycle things keep spiraling down for the consumer who is at the butt end of this strategy. Somehow this strategy needs to be abated or at sometime in the future for example we'll be paying the same or more for a roll of toilet paper that only has a few sheets in order to assure corporate profits continue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TomClash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-11 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. That's the fault of the shareholders
They demand higher and higher returns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-11 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
2. Give global1 a cigar...
Edited on Wed Oct-26-11 09:09 AM by ewagner
The driving force of American-style capitalism is growth.

If a business is not growing every quarter (not year...QUARTER) then Wall Street considers it a failure and this attitude has been inculcated into every Business School and MBA program in America.

The incontrovertible truth is that markets are finite. Growth cannot be sustained infinitely so techniques have to be developed to squeeze more profit out existing markets and processes...lower labor costs to that the ultimate cost of labor will be zero....cut quantities and raise prices...that 12 oz bag of potato chips used to be 16 oz......merge to capture a larger share of the market...diversify to protect against change....find ways of creating money out of thin air (derivitives...insurance...options) even if the they build an unstable house of cards that will come crashing down later.

The whole business paradigm has to change...who has the courage to change it...who has the wisdom to change it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-11 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. If there is no growth why would you invest in it?
And everyone needs to at least beat inflation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-11 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Surely you can see that such growth cannot be sustained
It's not enough to post profit. No, profits must be HIGHER than last year's profits, otherwise you've failed. That seems to the the corporate mantra.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-11 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #8
15. Until your products have reached every country why not?
As long as you can sell more widgets you should grow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
global1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-11 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #4
14. But The Current Strategy Just Feeds inflation....nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-11 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. I think this makes sense...
Edited on Wed Oct-26-11 09:51 AM by dkf
The reason that economic growth makes a debt system more stable is that we are dealing with a system in which a person (or company or government) borrows money at one date, and pays back that money plus interest at a later date. If the economy is growing rapidly, incomes tend to be rising, making the payback of loans, with interest, easier. A person who has taken out a home loan, or a loan for college expenses, will find that his higher income over time makes debt payments relatively affordable. Default rates tend to be low, so interest rates can be relatively low.

If there is no real growth (that is 0% economic growth), there will still be a few situations where loans make economic sense. These projects will have a good enough return that borrowed money can be used, and the return on the project will cover the interest on the loan. In general, the process will not work very well, however. Real incomes will not be rising fast enough to provide a cushion to make interest payments more affordable. Default rates will be quite high, so lenders will need to charge a higher interest rate to cover defaults. This will make loans affordable only in fairly rare circumstances.

http://www.theoildrum.com/node/2983
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
global1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-11 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. I Myself Went Back To School For An MBA....
There seemed to be a period in the the late 80's & 90's where that was in vogue. It seems to me that much of are current problems might correlate highly with the rise of MBA's out there. So much of what the consumer is up against is promotional lies and deception. How can we pull the wool over the eyes of the consumer? This to me is another contributing factor to the downward spiral we're in. Why can't we be content with doing just as well as last year? Why does it always have to be leaps & bounds better than last year? With that strategy - where will this take us - where will this end? Can't we be creative enough to extend profits with better & more innovative and affordable products versus raising the prices on current products?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-11 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
3. Steady, stable earnings aren't enough for Wall Street
Earnings have to be GROWING every year ... hell, every quarter. Stable earnings are boring.

Somehow, that mindset has got to change. Corporations cannot continue to suck more and ever more out of the economy. There's only so much there.

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-11 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
5. Actually, this was designed by Conservative Economic Fundamentalism
Reagan put one of the very first rules in place.
Businesses/Corporations have a responsiblity only
to the Shareholders. Therefore, they have no obligation
to workers or the country only the Shareholders..Their
only duty is to increase earnings and Profit for Shareholder

Prior to the eighties Business had some responsibility to
the workers and the country.

This was one of the most profound changes and the laid
the groundwork for many more changes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-11 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
6. That's the way capitalism works.

Capital must accumulate and re-invest in order to remain competitive otherwise those capitalists who do will destroy them in the marketplace. There is no getting around this. It is madness which only benefits the winning capitalists. We must have a rational method of production and this ain't it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marginlized Donating Member (219 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-11 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
7. It's easy to demonize corporations. They're doing what they're ...
DESIGNED to do. They are just automatons. How much can one CEO do when corporate boards are instituted by law to make him do what the corporation is supposed to do: maximize profits?

If you could introduce one monkey wrench that would change corporate behavior, what or where would that be? For example, using current legal decisions which view corporations as citizens, what impact would imposing a corporate loyalty pledge to country and fellow citizens have on their behavior?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-11 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. What happens to Toyota plants then?
Who are they loyal to? Japan?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indydem Donating Member (866 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-11 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. That's who pays their paychecks
I've long held that anyone who purchases a foreign car is a traitor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-11 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. You could say that about anything you buy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indydem Donating Member (866 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-11 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. I buy American made whenever I possibly can.
Sometimes it isn't possible,but I try very hard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evasporque Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-11 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
10. Corporate Capatalism is not sustainable...it is destined to collapse...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WingDinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-11 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
16. What noone here gets is, it is built into the fed.
The Fed creates money. But, not the interest. So, we must have growth, to pay the interest, or die. Built in. So, Everyone dances to that tune. No choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC