Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Swedish nuclear reactor closed after fire

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-11 09:43 AM
Original message
Swedish nuclear reactor closed after fire

http://www.boston.com/business/articles/2011/10/23/swedish_nuclear_reactor_closed_after_fire/


-snip-


Plant operator OKG's spokesman Anders Ostberg says a fire started in a turbine hall of Reactor 2 around midnight Saturday but was quickly extinguished by local rescue workers.

Ostberg said Sunday the blaze appears to have been caused by oil that leaked onto a hot surface.

But he said further investigations are needed to determine what caused the oil leak and that it wasn't immediately clear when the nuclear plant would reopen.

-snip-

The Nordic country gets nearly half of its electricity from 10 nuclear reactors, and abandoned plans to dismantle them by 2010.
--------------------------------

yes a simple fire can close a nuke plant

wonder why they abandoned plans to dismantle them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-11 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yes, a fire can shut down almost anything.
The fire's out. They'll repair the problem that caused it, then restart the plant. Fires close down many operations every day. Most reopen shortly afterwards, unless there is extensive damage.

Nuclear power generation is not safe. It has never been safe, and cannot be made to be safe.

Still, an oil fire at a nuclear power plant does not mean anything more than there was an oil fire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-11 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. Basic safety precaution.
Isn't that a good thing? :shrug:

>wonder why they abandoned plans to dismantle them?

Because they get half their power from them and decided building a crapload of coal or gas plants in their place was stupid?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 06:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC