Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Jury Rejects "My Daughter Saw Gay Porn!" Lawsuit

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 02:42 PM
Original message
Jury Rejects "My Daughter Saw Gay Porn!" Lawsuit
You may recall my 2008 post about former Big Brother contestant Kent Blackwelder, who filed a $4M lawsuit against Specialty Publications (a distributor of Titan Media) because his daughter "accidentally opened" one of their promo packages which was mysteriously sent to his house. Blackwelder's suit claimed that a five-second viewing of naked gay men caused his daughter to need counseling for a sudden fear of being kidnapped. (By Titan porn stars, one presumes.) Yesterday a Tennessee jury rejected the lawsuit as nonsense.

The four-woman, four-man civil jury rejected Powell father Kent Blackwelder's bid to hold California firm Specialty Publications Inc. financially responsible for his then-12-year-old daughter's glimpse of a racy advertisement for the gay magazine "Freshmen" in May 2007. "Do I wish it hadn't happened?" First Amendment attorney Richard Hollow asked jurors in closing arguments. "Yes. Do I believe children should be protected? You bet. But it's not up to everybody else to take care of our children." Blackwelder, who appeared on the "Big Brother" reality television show in 2001, wound up on the mailing list after his name and address were used to enter an online contest for a free trip to a "gay-friendly" locale. His daughter later opened a direct-mail brochure with photos of nude men. He sued, claiming the mailer was unsolicited, violated postal regulations and caused his daughter distress. But Hollow countered that the publisher, which has since folded, followed regulations. The mailing was sealed with a "wafer tab" and bore a warning label.

Blackwelder says he was put on the mailing list as an act of vengeance for a different lawsuit claiming he'd been fired from his job because he is white.

http://joemygod.blogspot.com/2010/12/tennessee-jury-rejects-my-daughter-saw.html

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kennah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. My Daughter Saw Gay Porn!
Sounds like a headline from The Weekly World News.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sharp_stick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. Reminds me of a story
about a father at a library. His kids, middle school age boys, were "accidentally" exposed to pornography on a library computer when they were searching for military colleges (schools) to attend. Of course his poor little spawn didn't mean to hunt down naked chicks on hustler.com they just thought that was a lead in site for West Point or the Coast Guard Academy.

He couldn't understand why everyone was laughing in the face of his fury. He wanted everyone in the city, except his horny kids, punished for exposing them to levels of vile filth that would no doubt lead to a lifetime of counselling that he also wanted the Government to pay for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. That's what happens when you google naked women.
A little parental supervision is called for sometimes. Sometimes you just have to deal with it. Kids have been finding pictures of naked adults for years. National Geographic, Dad's playboy, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. This is something a competent parent would treat as a "teachable moment"
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. I am speechless - this is too funny - thanks! K&R...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pepperbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. naked man=kidnapping. I am so glad someone cleared that up for me.
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. Kudos to the responsible, adult and sane jurors.
And, probably, the judge as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
7. He should have taught his daughter long ago to NOT open HIS mail. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. And that unless the mail was addressed directly to her that it isn't her mail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheilaT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
10. Several years ago I asked my sons,
then in their teens, how often they accidentally came across pornography when on the internet. They essentially said that they almost never came across it. I didn't ask them if they deliberately searched for it, because I only wanted to know how easily it was to access it without intending to. From what they said, I concluded that it wasn't all that easy to stumble upon.

I can tell you that I don't find myself suddenly on a pornographic website when searching for all the various things I might be searching for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gmoney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. as long as you have Google image safe search turned "on"
If you turn it off, even the most innocent search phrase is likely to land you in porn town...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheilaT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. I don't even know what Google image
safe search is. Maybe it's a default setting that I just never learned about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC