Healthcare reform penalizes married couples

[eridani]

Healthcare reform penalizes married couples
http://thehill.com/homenews/house/190105-healthcare-reform-penalizes-married-couples-says-report

The report concludes that fewer than 2 million couples--out of 60 million nationwide--are projected to benefit from the insurance subsidies, while "almost half of the beneficiaries of the tax credit will be unmarried individuals without dependent children."

One reason is that subsidies, which start in 2014, are tied to the federal poverty level, which does not increase proportionally along with household size.

Another problem is a snafu in the law that The Hill first reported back in July.

The law offers insurance subsidies for workers if their employer doesn't provide affordable coverage, but proposed regulations released in August peg that affordability to individual, not family, coverage. As a result, a worker's spouse and children would not have access to subsidies if that worker were offered affordable coverage--even if the worker could not afford the family coverage offered by the employer.

The American Academy of Pediatrics is spearheading a sign-on letter to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) that decries a family penalty "that will negatively impact the opportunity to access quality health insurance for significant numbers of children."

Comment by Don McCanne of PNHP: This is yet one more example of the fundamental strategic flaw of trying to design reform to fit a fragmented system of private health plans and public programs. Instead of a complex set of rules which are designed to protect the insurance industry, it would have been so much easier and much more efficient to design reform around the patient instead by simply declaring that everyone is covered by a single comprehensive program that is
equitably funded. We can still do that.

[eridani]

1. Friday informational kick n/t

[slipslidingaway]

2. Thanks knr nt