Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cold Fusion: Future of physics or phoney?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
masmdu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-11 12:00 PM
Original message
Cold Fusion: Future of physics or phoney?
Source: Wired

Today is set to be the start of a new era of cheap power, as a new type of low-cost nuclear reactor goes live in front of an audience of scientists and media representatives in Bologna. Once the mystery customer who commissioned the device has confirmed that it really is producing one megawatt, they'll pay the developer, Andrea Rossi.



Read more: http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2011-10/28/cold-fusion?page=2



So, if this proves to be for real EVERYTHING changes for the better!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Arctic Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-11 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. Am I reading this right? It's already online?
They just need to proof it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-11 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. Most of the cold fusion arrays have been wildly elaborate,
"cold" being a relative term, using huge arrays of electromagnets, gates of rare metals, and/or multiple lasers.

My own thought is that it's remotely possible but not on a Mr. Fusion scale.

My guess is that this is a scam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-11 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. IMO, it's the alchemy of our era.
Edited on Fri Oct-28-11 12:19 PM by Xithras
In earlier ages, pseudoscientists and inventors dedicated their lives to the creation of gold, because it was the cornerstone of their world. Nowadays that cornstone is energy.

People have been chasing cold fusion for a century, and a lot of people have made a lot of big claims that came to naught. At this point, I expect nothing from the people who continue to work on it. If they crack the puzzle and save the world, we'll rightly treat them as heroes. I don't expect it to happen, so I'm not going to waste hope on it.

Of course, we now know that the alchemists were right, and it IS possible to create gold from lead...it'll just cost you a lot more than the gold is actually worth, and requires the use of large atomic colliders and electron guns. With that in mind, I will acknowledge that it's theoretically possible for cold fusion to work. Just don't get your hopes up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
masmdu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-11 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. We'll see by end of today...at least for this device.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-11 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. Very low cost/low risk/non polluting energy would turn the world updside down in many ways
Kind of doubtful its real, but would be quite willing to be surprised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-11 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
6. Evidence. If they can show evidence (not just parlor tricks) I'll believe it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-11 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
7. The guy has many of the characteristics of a confidence man..
I think it's about 99% sure to be some kind of scam..

Not that I'm completely dismissive of the idea of cold fusion, but this guy just reeks of confidence game.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DreamSmoker Donating Member (442 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-11 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
8. I posted about this last Spring here..
I posted this last spring before any demo...
Caught some flack to as many do no believe it possible..
We shall see...
If fact??? It will change the Planets way of getting Power..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bosonic Donating Member (774 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-11 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
9. I wonder what a positive demonstration
would do for the price of nickel?

I'd be (pleasantly) surprised if it works, I guess the next 72 hours is do or die time.

At least the E-Cat is only implausible not physically impossible; the last 'energy miracle' that I seem to recall was the Steorn Orbo, which was touted as an credulity-shattering magnetic over-unity device.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LongTomH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-11 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
10. I'm still really skeptical!
I'm really skeptical about the whole field. My skepticism becomes extreme about the idea that 'cold fusion' will ever be a major energy source. A lot of the researchers still working in this field now use the term: Low Energy Nuclear Reaction(LENR) instead of 'cold fusion.'

One article talked about replacing a home furnace with an 'e-cat' reactor and eliminating home heating bills. I have yet to see anyone claim that any of the 'e-cats' could produce steam at temperatures and pressures sufficient for a modern generating plant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
masmdu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-11 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
11. IT SEEMS IT WORKS! 470 kW maintainied during self sustain mode! (just reported)
Edited on Fri Oct-28-11 01:44 PM by masmdu
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticAverse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-11 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. It's suppose to be a 1 Megawatt plant. So they're off by a factor of > 2...
"doveryai, no proveryai"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yo_Mama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-11 05:52 AM
Response to Reply #11
23. That's not proof
Proof would be that the device put out more power than was fed in over the WHOLE cycle - which has never yet been demonstrated.

Hell, I could charge up a car battery, then switch the input to trickle power, attach some devices which drew out more than was being fed in at the moment and claim I'd saved the world. So far, Rossi has never run a public test which amounts to any more than that.

CALLING it self-sustaining is not the same thing as SHOWING it is self-sustaining!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasProgresive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-11 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
12. I will suspend disbelief when it is accepted and replicated
by peer review.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slutticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-11 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
13. First rule of the internet: Never trust anyone who types in all caps
SORRY MR ROSSI.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-11 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
14. Just a guess but
I think he has probably invented the NiH2 battery which is already invented. I'm placing this on the rather extremely doubtful without more information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-11 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
15. I am still trying to get my cell phone to make popcorn
:freak:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-11 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
16. I give it about 10 Million to one odds against.
But I would be thrilled to be proven wrong.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticAverse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-11 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
18. "leave the heating on 24/7 and never see a fuel bill again". Not true...
The E-cat consumes nickel and hydrogen which does have to be replaced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticAverse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-11 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Video from today (Oct 28, 2011) of Rossi...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticAverse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-11 03:07 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. Some additional video from Today's event....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yo_Mama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-11 04:54 AM
Response to Original message
21. There's no evidence that this works - and the presumption is against it.
I'm afraid this man has fooled himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-11 05:08 AM
Response to Original message
22. I say let a top team of scrutineers from the NHRA, NASCAR and so on take a peek...
Their entire job is to find people trying to hide technology, drilled out bolts, hidden passages drilled through apparently solid objects, hoses that are concentric and carry two different fluids with the inner one being illicit are all in a day's work to these folks.

If that machine is crooked, they'd find it.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC