Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WAIT...A beauty pageant contestant who doesn't understand POLITICS? Is that even POSSIBLE?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 04:13 AM
Original message
WAIT...A beauty pageant contestant who doesn't understand POLITICS? Is that even POSSIBLE?




Some beauty queens might expect to get questions about world peace. But the question asked of the newly minted Miss America on Saturday night touched on a less generalized topic: secrets outlet WikiLeaks.

"Everybody's talking about the WikiLeaks, how do we balance people's right to know with the need for government security?" Teresa Scanlan was asked.

"You know when it came to that situation it was actually based on espionage, and when it comes to the security of our nation we have to focus on security first, and then people's right to know," the teen replied.

"Because it's so important that everyone in our borders is safe, and so we can't let things like that happen and they must be handled properly, and I think that was the case," she added.

Her answer, concise as it were, was actually wrong.

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/01/america-wikileaks-based-espionage/


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Demit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 04:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. 'Her answer, concise as it were'?
What are the author trying to say there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrModerate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 05:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Often these pageantists wander all over the rhetorical map in Palinesque fashion . . .
Edited on Tue Jan-18-11 05:47 AM by MrModerate
And end up figuratively crawling up their own backsides. This answer, though a watered-down version of someone's wigged out reality, actually made some logical sense.

Factually wrong on multiple levels, but not completely incoherent (which is the norm for this sort of thing).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC