Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Was autistic man really a Marine? Military court to decide

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-11 11:08 AM
Original message
Was autistic man really a Marine? Military court to decide
Los Angeles native Joshua D. Fry had been diagnosed as autistic and was living in a group home for people with mental disabilities when a Marine Corps recruiter signed him up for service.

Fry's enlistment three years ago helped the recruiter meet his quota. It turned out far worse for Fry, who ended up being court-martialed on child pornography and other charges. Now his fate is posing a mind-boggling question for military judges:

Was Fry never really in the Marine Corps in the first place?

Citing his autism and a reported IQ of 70, Fry's attorneys say he lacked the mental capacity to enter into an enlistment contract. If they're right, it means that Fry wasn't a Marine even while attending boot camp and infantry school. He always was a civilian, immune to military prosecution.



Read more: http://www.kansascity.com/2011/10/30/3238204/was-autistic-man-really-a-marine.html#ixzz1cHXaEtC7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Pab Sungenis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-11 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. The recruiter who signed him up is the one who should be in prison
not this guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-11 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Child porn is still child porn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-11 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. They should both be imprisoned for different reasons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1monster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-11 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. There is no excuse for child porn, I agree. It is a dispicable crime that scars
Edited on Sun Oct-30-11 12:20 PM by 1monster
children so used for the rest of their lives.

But autistic people and espcially those with low IQs are often unable to understand or reason out the differences between right and worng. They may understand that hurting another person is wrong and not do it, but fail to understand that sexual acting out with children hurts those children. Having finally managed to learn that, making the connection that looking at photos of children who have been placed in sexual positions and actions is also wrong is not likely. Making conncetions isn't something an autistic person can do.

I have no understanding and little mercy on those who have normal intelligence, who are able to understand right from wrong, societal norms. But for those who are as impaired as the young man in this story, there is next to no help and support, care, or understanding. They will always be children in this world. They are stangers in a strange land with no willingness to help them understand.

I'm willing to bet that, on the online comments sections of the newspapers and blogs that carried this story, there were torture and death threats toward this young man and he really doesn't understand the anger directed at him -- if indeed he even perceives it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-11 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Isn't that worse though if a person can't reason properly and is addicted to child porn?
Seems like a recipe for disaster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1monster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-11 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. It is. But the problem is worse than that. I don't have any statistics, but many of those
austistic kids were sexually abused as young children too. That really messes up the situation especially if the children did not suffer physical pain as a result. It really causes problems.

However, the answer is not to put them in prison. They will be even further screwed up by by the amoral sociopaths who will interact with them and use them while in prison. They need to be in group homes where some can be contributing members of society, with 24 hour supervision and very limited or no access to the Internet. I have never tried to find out myself, but I'm told that it is extremely easy to find child pornography on the Internet.

The FBI and other law enforcement should work much harder on eliminating the source of those Internet sites (and arresting the producers and distributors) than they do. They could always pull the manpower from by retraining DEA agents who currently go after state regulated medical marijuana farmers...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-11 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. I think Anonymous is doing a better job...
I'm not a big fan of vigilanteism, but the hackers out there seem to have made a habit of taking down child porn servers, and if the FBI were to turn a blind eye to those hacks I doubt anybody would be very upset.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-11 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. Yes, and IF he had been left in the group home he should have
been supervised properly and it would not have happened. That is the job of group home workers. When they put him in the military he had no one to supervise him. They are to blame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-11 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Agreed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-11 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
2. With an IQ of 70, how did he even pass the ASVAB test? I would have thought
that the test would have indicated a problem with his enlistment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-11 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. I had that same thought
But I don't know enough about those tests.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-11 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. Imagine an SAT with a very reduced verbal section and an added mechanical section
So, basic algebra, qualitative geometry, and a mechanical section where there are diagrams of machines and the question is "if you push down on lever arm A, what direction does part B move in?" or some such. Another part of the mechanical section is definitely achievement rather than aptitutde: it has a diagram of a part of an engine and asks you what it is.

(Caveat: I took the ASVAB in 1997 and it may have changed since then.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-11 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. You can get an ASVAB waiver, though the Corps rarely grants them
This is kind of surprising because the Marines are still the one branch that are making their numbers and have a waiting list. Though that wouldn't necessarily apply to any given recruiter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-11 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. I was not aware of any waiver. I always thought the test was mandatory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cid_B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-11 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. The test is mandatory... The score is waiverable...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-11 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Ah, I see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-11 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. What Cid said, also he may have tested OK
Edited on Sun Oct-30-11 12:56 PM by Recursion
Autistic persons can have low IQs as measured but still be very good at some kinds of standardized tests. The ASVAB's main axes are spatial, mathematical, and mechanical reasoning. There's much less of the SAT verbal-type stuff.

But, like I said, the Corps isn't really in the habit of granting waivers except for exceptionally physically fit people (the Corps has the highest mean and median incoming ASVAB score among recruits -- the stereotype aside, we jarheads really aren't that dumb).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-11 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. I know some marines. I never thought they were dumb. Thanks for your service.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-11 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
17. Back in the Vietnam War there were persons with developmental
disabilities in the military. And the government knew it. The idea was that if they could follow orders they could be drafted. I was in the ARK at the time and we were fighting this. LBJ did promise it would stop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC