Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cold Fusion Test (LENR) E-Cat a success over the weekend per Wired

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
masmdu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-11 06:11 PM
Original message
Cold Fusion Test (LENR) E-Cat a success over the weekend per Wired
http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2011-10/29/rossi-success?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

Against all the odds, Andrea Rossi's E-Cat cold fusion power plant passed its biggest test yesterday, producing an average of 470 kilowatts for more than five hours. (A technical glitch prevented it from achieving a megawatt as originally planned). The demonstration was monitored closely by engineers from Rossi's mysterious US customer, which was evidently satisfied and paid up.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
buddysmellgood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-11 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. smells like bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticAverse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-11 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. Previously posted and discussed on DU here...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-11 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. The perpetual motion machine scam strikes again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-11 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. color me unconvinced
real science isn't done under these sorts of hush-hush 'mysterious' conditions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-11 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. Let a team of NHRA, NASCAR, Formula 1 and so on scrutineers examine it in detail..
Their day to day job is catching people cheating or trying to cheat with technology, hollow bolts, holes drilled through apparently solid objects, concentric hoses that flow two different liquids with the outer one being the legitimate, battery wires that are hollow and carry an illicit fluid, all kinds of tricks..

The average engineer or academic simply isn't sneaky enough to be top notch at catching sneaky people, their default assumption is that things are as they seem and it's hard for them to change mental states to being suspicious, scrutineers don't have to change mental state to look very hard at something for evidence of it not being straightforward.

For instance, a really easy example would be a hose that is blistering hot to the touch on the outside while flowing ice water out the end.

Or vice versa.

You could touch it or even look at it with a thermal imager and not tell that the hose was doing the opposite of what it appeared.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catabryna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-11 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Deep. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-11 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. More like shade tree Machiavelli..
Get beat a few times by someone whose "battery" is actually a (perfectly) disguised fuel tank that gives him an extra lap or two before he has to pit and your perspective changes.. That one got caught in a tear-down after he just won too many times by too big a margin, the scrutineers left a pile of parts where the bike was.

A lot of racers are "conspiracy theorists" because that's how *they* would have done it, if you're not cheatin' you're not tryin'.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catabryna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-11 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. I love race cars... but
Edited on Sun Oct-30-11 08:41 PM by catabryna
fast is always, well, boring.

So, is your scenario.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-11 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I love you too..
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-11 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
7. Bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngkorWot Donating Member (792 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-11 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
8. I'm confident this works.
"The demonstration was monitored closely by... Rossi's mysterious... customer, which was evidently satisfied and paid up."

I haven't been so confident since I saw that game of three card monte, where the dealer challenged the first person in the crowd, whom he totally didn't know (I'm quite confident), and the first person won easily. Confident.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brother Buzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-11 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
10. It didn't happen until it's published then verified by independent scientists
Until then, it's snake oil. That's my opinion and I'm sticking to it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-11 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
13. And neutrinos broke the speed of light.
Sometimes people are full of shit, and it gets reported...because the people reporting are stupid fucks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC