|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
IndyPragmatist (556 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-11 02:27 PM Original message |
This is going to make OWS look bad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
daggahead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-11 02:30 PM Response to Original message |
1. This can be viewed as a way for the movement to pay for ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TBMASE (322 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-11 02:38 PM Response to Reply #1 |
10. Sooooo, when a group that's protesting the evils of capitalism engages in capitalism |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-11 02:42 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. They're protesting the excesses of capitalism |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vets74 (714 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-11 05:21 PM Response to Reply #12 |
53. OWS has to COPYRIGHT and TRADEMARK its name and slogans in order to control their uses. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kingofalldems (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-11 02:42 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. Your post makes no sense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
coalition_unwilling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-11 03:44 PM Response to Reply #13 |
40. True. In fact, the latest opinion polling done, I believe, by Fordham U., shows |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jumping John (597 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-11 02:43 PM Response to Reply #10 |
15. So wouldn't this be a way to show the lying media that they are not trying to ruin Capitalism? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arcane1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-11 02:44 PM Original message |
Well, since the movement is most definitely not anti-capitalist, what's the problem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-11 02:48 PM Response to Reply #10 |
21. I highly suggest you go down to one of these |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unapatriciated (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-11 03:34 PM Response to Reply #10 |
36. if they own it they can't be prevented from using it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-11 03:35 PM Response to Reply #10 |
37. Your concern is duley noted... eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
coalition_unwilling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-11 03:46 PM Response to Reply #10 |
41. If they're going to sell things to raise money, that's not necessarily |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kingofalldems (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-11 03:48 PM Response to Reply #10 |
42. Looks like a hit and run over here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ZombieHorde (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-11 05:54 PM Response to Reply #10 |
54. OWS is not anti capitalism, so it is not hypocritical. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MannyGoldstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-11 02:31 PM Response to Original message |
2. Why does this make them look bad? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndyPragmatist (556 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-11 02:35 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. Because most people only read headlines |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-11 02:33 PM Response to Original message |
3. Lemme see who else could use this in a bad way? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brickbat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-11 02:33 PM Response to Original message |
4. Only if it's printed on made-in-China crap. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
USA_1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-11 02:34 PM Response to Original message |
5. Non Profit Organizations Typically Trademark |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire Walk With Me (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-11 02:35 PM Response to Original message |
6. Aha! #Occupy brings to light the dirty tricks regarding ownership and use! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arcane1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-11 02:37 PM Response to Original message |
8. I disagree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gratuitous (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-11 02:38 PM Response to Original message |
9. News flash: The Occupy movement lives in the society it lives in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndyPragmatist (556 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-11 02:40 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. That was my point. People have created stereotypes about it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ret5hd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-11 02:45 PM Response to Reply #11 |
17. why don' we ask you what to do... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndyPragmatist (556 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-11 02:50 PM Response to Reply #17 |
22. I posted a story |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ret5hd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-11 02:57 PM Response to Reply #22 |
25. You posted a smear. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndyPragmatist (556 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-11 03:03 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. You think information is bad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ret5hd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-11 03:07 PM Response to Reply #27 |
29. Misinformation is bad. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadrasT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-11 03:31 PM Response to Reply #27 |
35. If you are so big on "independent thought"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
me b zola (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-11 05:04 PM Response to Reply #27 |
52. No, your rw spin on the information is what we are objecting to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jumping John (597 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-11 02:47 PM Response to Reply #11 |
20. So are you condoning the catering to the mis and uninformed because they choose not to be informed? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RegieRocker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-11 02:43 PM Response to Original message |
14. Dumb move |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-11 02:44 PM Response to Original message |
16. FALSE INFORMATION ALERT trademark was applied for by Occupier/t-shirt seller |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rug (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-11 02:45 PM Response to Reply #16 |
19. This is the trademark application. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-11 03:53 PM Response to Reply #19 |
47. Thanks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kingofalldems (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-11 02:45 PM Response to Original message |
18. Didn't they always look bad to you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hell Hath No Fury (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-11 03:01 PM Response to Reply #18 |
26. Ding ding ding! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dtexdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-11 02:52 PM Response to Original message |
23. Bullshit. If it doesn't, someone else will. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-11 02:56 PM Response to Original message |
24. no reason on earth that would make ows look bad..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tsiyu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-11 03:10 PM Response to Reply #24 |
31. rofl |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RandiFan1290 (721 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-11 03:03 PM Response to Original message |
28. Oh my! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-11 03:08 PM Response to Original message |
30. I guess these guys weren't "real" socialists either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xchrom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-11 03:24 PM Response to Original message |
32. That is some funny Bull Shit you're pedaling. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-11 03:25 PM Response to Original message |
33. not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iggo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-11 03:29 PM Response to Original message |
34. Only to certain people. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-11 03:36 PM Response to Original message |
38. this? this is what is going to make OWS look bad? lol, i was expecting.... something. BUT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kestrel91316 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-11 03:42 PM Response to Original message |
39. BS alert!!! BS alert!!!! BS alert!!!! OWS is not applying for this trademark. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uncle Joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-11 03:50 PM Response to Reply #39 |
44. I agree, it's just trademark carpetbaggers n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-11 03:52 PM Response to Reply #39 |
46. Note that the OP chose not to update the false info |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uncle Joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-11 03:48 PM Response to Original message |
43. Other than anger and fear that's another thing Occupy Wall Street and the Tea Party have in common. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
coalition_unwilling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-11 03:50 PM Response to Original message |
45. K&R for the discussion. Thanks for posting - n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jwirr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-11 04:04 PM Response to Original message |
48. Don't you apply for a trademark to keep just anyone from using it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raksha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-11 04:06 PM Response to Original message |
49. Unrec - typical concern troll post, slightly more blatant than usual. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NorthCarolina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-11 05:01 PM Response to Original message |
50. Unrec. This is completely false. It was a T-Shirt vendor that applied for a Trademark, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lunatica (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-11 05:03 PM Response to Original message |
51. self delete |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:10 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC