Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. Government Glossed Over Cancer Concerns As It Rolled Out Airport X-Ray Scanners

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-11 09:17 PM
Original message
U.S. Government Glossed Over Cancer Concerns As It Rolled Out Airport X-Ray Scanners
U.S. Government Glossed Over Cancer Concerns As It Rolled Out Airport X-Ray Scanners

A ProPublica/PBS NewsHour investigation of how this decision was made shows that in post-9/11 America, security issues can trump even long-established medical conventions. The final call to deploy the X-ray machines was made not by the FDA, which regulates drugs and medical devices, but by the TSA, an agency whose primary mission is to prevent terrorist attacks.

Research suggests that anywhere from six to 100 U.S. airline passengers each year could get cancer from the machines. Still, the TSA has repeatedly defined the scanners as “safe,” glossing over the accepted scientific view that even low doses of ionizing radiation — the kind beamed directly at the body by the X-ray scanners — increase the risk of cancer.

“Even though it’s a very small risk, when you expose that number of people, there’s a potential for some of them to get cancer,” said Kathleen Kaufman, the former radiation management director in Los Angeles County, who brought the prison X-rays to the FDA panel’s attention.

About 250 X-ray scanners are currently in U.S. airports, along with 264 body scanners that use a different technology, a form of low-energy radio waves known as millimeter waves.


MORE:
http://www.propublica.org/article/u.s.-government-glossed-over-cancer-concerns-as-it-rolled-out-airport-x-ray
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Matariki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-11 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh what a day to read this post :(
Just had a depressing time at the airport. First time I've flown since all this shite started. So depressing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nc4bo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-11 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. Oh hell no...
Liars! 6 to 100 at risk for CANCER??? Because they simply wanted to fly to their destination and TSA has the nerve and audacity to treat anyone who opts out to an invasive and embarrassing manual body search?

OMG what is wrong with us.....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-11 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. Wait, didn't we raise these concerns?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nc4bo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-11 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Absolutely without a doubt raised a hell of a lot of concerns. dear god.
And before anyone poo-poos all over this article, I guarantee won't be thrilled when it's their loved one or beloved friend gets a diagnosis of cancer.

And, I'm sure there will be all sorts of other excuses as to why this or that person got the cancer, everything but body scanners.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-11 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. Yep, we raised hell about this last year at Thanksgiving as well.
Today, we read this:

U.S. Government Glossed Over Cancer Concerns As It Rolled Out Airport X-Ray Scanners, November 1, 2011



We've been screaming about these scanners for years now.



WTF has happened to this country?





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-11 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. We collectively went to sleep
And wanted safety for security.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllyCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-11 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
6. I have not flown since this started. We drive or take the train.
I'm getting used to the slower pace. I've not really found a reason yet to fly anywhere to save time yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC