Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

" GET OUT OF JAIL " Cards For Wall Street

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Segami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-02-11 12:02 PM
Original message
" GET OUT OF JAIL " Cards For Wall Street






" Did you ever wonder why nobody is getting prosecuted for the biggest white-collar crime in the history of the world--the worldwide financial collapse of 2007-2008? The answers have started to come out. One explanation involves a remarkably lenient U.S. Department of Justice, who were apparently sensitive to large corporations, like Wall Street banks, having to worry about being hauled off to jail. Can you imagine how upset bank execs would be if they knew the DOJ would come after them for some clever little transgressions that may have inadvertently blown up the world's economy?



Two New York Times reporters several months back discovered that federal prosecutors adopted lenient new guidelines in 2008 allowing "deferred prosecutions," enabling the Department of Justice to essentially handslap corporate criminals. Rather than a guilty or not guilty plea, the government allowed companies to investigate themselves and report whatever wrongdoings they found. The feds could then delay or dismiss any prosecution if the companies promised to change its behavior. You know, a kinder, gentler DOJ. According to Gretchen Mortenson and Louise Story ("As Wall St. Polices Itself, Prosecutors Use Softer Approach," New York Times, July 7, 2011) this lenient policy may help explain why nobody is being held accountable for the super-sized white-collar crimes in the housing and financial markets:




Though little noticed outside legal circles, the guidelines were welcomed by firms representing banks...The guidelines left open a possibility other than guilty or not guilty, giving leniency often if companies investigated and reported their own wrongdoing. In return, the government could enter into agreements to delay or cancel the prosecution if the companies promised to change their behavior.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/08/business/in-shift-federal-prosecutors-are-lenient-as-companies-break-the-law.html?_r=2&pagewanted=1




Although these "deferred prosecutions" were used in the Bush Administration prior to the financial crisis, the DOJ made them official in 2008. They must have figured the banks had plenty enough to worry about and didn't need the pressure of any pesky prosecutors lurking about.



The Securities and Exchange Commission also added deferred prosecution as a tool last year and has embraced another alternative to litigation -- reports
that chronicle wrongdoing at institutions like Moody's Investors Service, often without punishing anyone.




That's right. Their punishment is having a report published about their criminal activity.




Another example of this more cautious prosecutorial strategy: Government lawyers now go to companies earlier in an inquiry, and often tell companies to figure out whether improper activities occurred. Then those companies hire law firms to investigate and report back to the government.




Some critics call it "outsourcing" of investigations, according to Morgenson and Story, who go on to detail numerous examples of collusion between corporations and the government.




Such results provide bragging rights among corporate defense lawyers, according to longtime observers of the legal system.

"The corporate crime defense bar has this down to a science," said Russell Mokhiber, the editor of Corporate Crime Reporter, a publication that tracks prosecutions. "I interview them all the time, and they boast about how they've gamed the system."



This is the kind of story the American people should have been enraged about. And they probably would have been, if they had known about it. The New York Times investigation was published last July, and wasn't a sexy or interesting enough story to get much play at that time in the corporate news media. Besides, it wouldn't be in the media company's best interest to call attention to it.




cont'

http://www.opednews.com/articles/Get-Out-Of-Jail-Cards-Fo-by-Arlen-Grossman-111102-700.html


.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-02-11 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-02-11 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. And business needs to repeal more regulations because . . . ?
How volatile the system is! You don't have to follow the rules anyway, you can investigate yourself and exonerate yourself from all wrongdoing because the Department of Justice sure as shit isn't going to do it, and yet the Republicans have the brass cojones to whine about how horrible our regulatory climate is for our beleaguered business class.

The robber barons of the 19th century could only dream of this level of impunious plunder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PETRUS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-02-11 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Downwinder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-02-11 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. Anybody remember in the old serial westerns,
the bankers were always the bad guys or behind the bad guys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Segami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-02-11 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Nothing has changed except the ' actors & theatre '. The storyline & plot remains the same
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-02-11 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. Getting rid of Spitzer was also essential to the banksters...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Segami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-02-11 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. That they did!! He presented a clear & present danger to exposing their crimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-02-11 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
8. Thanks, but I'm going to have to take a break from all news for a month to get over that assualt.
I KNEW it, but I really didn't want to have the honest truth shoved down my throat. I don't even have anyone to share it with - most of the family are teabaggers, the rest are dead and the S.O. is non-political (job issues).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC