Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mark Rudd (Part #1): DU Exclusive

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 02:06 PM
Original message
Mark Rudd (Part #1): DU Exclusive
Mark Rudd recently had an op-ed in the Washington Post, prompted by the senseless violence in Tucson. In it, Rudd spoke about the combination of politics and violence in America. For the “older generation” of participants on the Democratic Underground, when Mark Rudd speaks, we listen: he was one of the most articulate spokespersons from the the revolutionary youth movement from the 1960s.

No matter if one viewed him as a thermostat or thermometer of the '60s, Rudd was involved in many of the groups and actions that defined that turbulent decade. He was the president of the Columbia University branch of the Students for Democratic Society (SDS) in 1968, at the time of the student revolt; he was among the leaders of SDS faction known as the Revolutionary Youth Movement; and he helped create the Weathermen (later, Weather Underground).

After spending seven years “underground,” as a fugitive from justice, Rudd turned himself in on September 26, 1977. Because some of the government tactics, known as “COINTELPRO,” the US Department was kept from prosecuting him for all of the crimes the FBI believed he was involved in. After paying his dues to society, he began teaching mathematics at a college in New Mexico.

Perhaps more so than any other participant from that era, Mark Rudd has engaged in an on-going self-examination. Much of this is detailed in two books: “Truth or Consequences: The Education of Mark Rudd” (1990), and “Underground”(2009). It is my impression that he has never been able to truly forgive himself for his involvement in violent radical political action.

Last night, as I began doing an outline for this exclusive Democratic Underground interview with Rudd, my 16-year old daughter, Chloe, asked me what I was doing. I explained to her, in general terms, who I was preparing to interview. She said, “Oh, so he's kind of like you – he was angry and violent when he was young, but now he's an older guy fighting for peace. That's great.”

Just as I wouldn't care to have my daughter exposed to the person I used to be, I wouldn't care to have her influenced by a young Mark Rudd. The best antidote for that, by no coincidence, is having her and other young people who are frustrated by the tone in American politics today, listen to the insights of the mature Mark Rudd.

(Note: This is the first half of the interview. When the second half is completed, I'll post it. It includes some of the questions that people here suggested yesterday. Also, I am hoping that people will ask other questions on this OP/thread, which Mark may decide are worth joining this forum to answer.)

{1} My favorite book about the 1968 student revolt at Columbia University is James Simon Kunen's “The Strawberry Statement.” In it, the author describes you as “known to everyone, well known to few.” Can you describe to the high school and college students reading this forum what it was like to be a college student in that era? While the Vietnam War was the most pressing issue, what else contributed to the university students taking over parts of the campus?

Mark Rudd: This is an important story, which I tell at length in the first part of my book, "Underground." Speaking only for myself, I can tell you that I didn't want to be a good German meaning I didn't want to stand by while my country was murdering millions. I didn't want to assent to the racism which was overt at that time in the legally segregated south or the de facto segregated north. It's a question of not accepting my white skin and class privilege. So I wanted to side with the people of the world in their struggle against US imperialism. It was absolutely exhilarating to go beyond oneself and act in a much much larger cause. In taking over Columbia University around its support for the war and its institutional racism, that's what we were doing.



{2} In the 1960s, student groups such as the SDS were involved in both the anti-war and the Civil Rights movements. On April 4, 1967, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., boldly combined these two movements, in his “A Time to Break Silence (Beyond Vietnam)” speech at the Riverside Church in New York City. In your opinion, how much did his murder, a year to the day later, contribute to young people's embracing violent tactics in America?

Mark Rudd: The murder of Dr. King confirmed the "by any means necessary" direction of the black power movement, which had grown in the black freedom struggle since about 1965. Nonviolence seemed like a dead end after the assassination. Black power was a huge challenge to white new left kids who wanted to act in solidarity with black revolutionaries, not just applaud on the sidelines.



{3} The federal government was unable to pursue some charges against you, because of the tactics that were part of COINTELPRO. Some of those tactics were proposed in the Nixon administration as the “Huston Plan,” named after Thomas Charles Huston, a Nixon aide. Do you think that the Patriot Act, first passed during George W. Bush's administration, is largely an updated Huston Plan?

Mark Rudd: I'd have to go back and reread the Huston Plan in order to answer your question specifically. However, in general the government wants to restrict and control dissent, infiltrate movements and organizations, and expand its prosecutorial and surveillance power. The post-9/11 PATRIOT Act gave the federal government unprecedented power, including suspending habeas corpus and other civil liberties in cases labeled "terrorist." Cases like mine would never be dropped now because of government illegalities, because nothing is illegal, up to and including murder



{4} Should federal attorney Patrick Fitzgerald have pursued charges against Vice President Cheney for the Plame Scandal?

Mark Rudd: Of course. But at the same time many Bush administration officials should be tried for lying and for war crimes.



{5} Do you have any tips or suggestions for people who want to become active in grass roots level community action today?

Mark Rudd: Figure out what organizing strategies have worked in historical movements of the 20th century, like the labor, civil rights, anti-war, women's and gay rights movements, and see if those strategies are applicable to organizing now. I've been studying SNCC in the southern civil rights movement lately. Find out who Miss Ella J. Baker was and what her philosophy and practice was.



{6} Besides your 2009 book “Underground,” what books would you consider essential for students of American politics?

Mark Rudd: Anything by Noam Chomsky and Howard Zinn are good starting points. Especially the latter's "A People's History of the U.S." Charles M. Payne's "I've Got the Light of Freedom," about SNCC in Mississippi, reads like an organizing handbook. I love the writing of Tom Hayden, a founder of SDS. I highly recommend his 2009 book, "The Long Sixties," in which he sets forth a theory of mass movements. Read anything at all by Staughton Lynd.



{7} In “Underground,” you quote Erich Fromm quoting Nietzsche: “There are times when anyone who does not lose his mind has no mind to lose.” What does that mean to you?

Mark Rudd: It's a bit literary and overblown. I think the point is that things are pretty bad and we need to get working.



{8} I've probably quoted Fromm on the Democratic Underground more than any other source. I believe his“The Sane Society” is more important today, than when he published it in 1955. What are the most important things that you have learned in reading his works?

Mark Rudd: Sorry, I've never read Fromm. The quote was used by someone else at the alternate Columbia 1968 graduation. Tell me about Fromm



{9} In your recent op-ed, you wrote that Sarah Palin and her cross-hair map “deserve nothing but ignominy.” What steps do you believe people can take to marginalize the politicians and journalists who try to incite with violent words and images? And what steps are necessary to improve the political and cultural dialogue in our country today?


Mark Rudd: We need to figure out how to build a mass movement for economic justice, peace, and to save the planet. The only possible way to do so is to use absolute nonviolence. In building such a movement, we'll be countering the far-rights absurdities and lies.


{10} What specific political issues concern you today?

Mark Rudd: Personally, I've always been concerned with our government's militarism. I also work in the movement for environmental justice at a local level. Mostly, I've been working within the Democratic Party to build a progressive caucus that can eventually change the direction of the party from center-right to center-left. It has to become a party of the people, not the second party of the capitalists. The issue of power concerns me greatly.



{11} Are there any political or social leaders that you are particularly favorably impressed with today? Are you optimistic, pessimistic, or a combination of the two, about our country's future?

Mark Rudd: I'm always optimistic because I can't afford to lose hope. It's an existential decision. I do believe that rationality has a chance to win over irrationality, especially when it comes to questions of our planet's survival. Of course there are many counter trends.

Many people are organizing on a local level and within the Democratic Party. I just read "Herding Donkeys" by Ari Berman, who tells the story of Howard Dean and the people who led a grassroots insurrection against the power brokers starting from 2004.

I have a lot of hopes for President Obama as a leader, but we need to give him a movement to lead.



{12} What were the most important lessons from the 1960s? What parts of that era are your best memories?

Mark Rudd: The fact that a mass movement actually stopped a war of aggression and the fact that I was a member of that movement, along with millions of others. Similarly, other mass movements, such as the civil rights movement, women's, gay rights, disability rights, all changed the cultural face of this country. Mass movements arise is the great lesson. They take organizing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. An absolutely fabulous interview
Waiting for Part 2

Rec a thousand times :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Thanks.
I'm hoping that it is an idea that others here will take up. I like doing it, and although an internet interview does not allow for the level of communication that I'd like to have had, I think this is pretty interesting.

In my opinion, this forum can become much better than it already is. And now is the time to take steps towards that goal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. It's an excellent idea
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cerridwen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. Thanks.
Much appreciated!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SalviaBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. K&R
Thanks for doing this. I will look forward to reading all of your interviews.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
al bupp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. Well worth the read, thanks, nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
7. Awesome
Enjoyed the exchange you had with your daughter and the book references, more reading to do.

Thanks H20 Man, looking forward to Part 2. :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
8. 9, 10 & 12 really speak to my concerns.
Thank you so much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
9. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneGrassRoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
10. So much good stuff here. Thanks H20 Man...
I'm always optimistic because I can't afford to lose hope. It's an existential decision.


What a great quote.

K&R, and looking forward to Part 2.

:hi:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #10
28. I connected with that, also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
11. I look forward to the second half of the interview.
Thanks for the thread, H2OMan.:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
12. so, other than suggesting reading material
(which of course, I'm going to read) what are HIS suggestions for creating this movement? I know people have just got to stand up and do it, but it would be great to meet 20 or 30 thousand of my best friends at the corner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. See #5.
I asked him more about that, which will be in part two.

Feel free to ask questions for him here. Also, "google" to find some of his frustrations with the lack of organization at the grass roots' level.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
druidity33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
13. Really good stuff, looking forward to the next...
if you could stand a small criticism however, you might try bolding Rudd's name or italicizing the questions. I think a little smoother formatting would make it a lot smoother to read. Thanks for the great piece and looking forward to more!

K&R.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. I agree.
I was actually thinking along similar lines. However, my technical abilities, so far as making an interview more easy to read, are limited. My kids are outside, riding sleds etc in the snow. I should probably have waited a couple hours, and asked their help. (They never seem to tire of showing me these things, over and over and over.)

However, when they do come in, I will likely be reduced to the "taxi & wallet" status that I am becoming accustomed to! Ha!

But, yes, I definitely appreciate your suggestion, and will try to institute it in the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
15. K&R, there were profound differences between SDS and those that became bombers
Edited on Tue Jan-18-11 02:56 PM by bobthedrummer
I had a high school teacher that helped draft The Port Huron Statement, he encouraged teenagers to confront the draft, oppression, and many other societal structural barriers in creative ways that were non-violent.

Today it's a privatized policestate with extrajudiciary power just raring to have a go at the terrorists in the name of freedom-that's clearly fascist and heading towards totalitarianism within the life of your kids and mine Patrick.

Thanks for starting these interviews.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. I remember when the SDS had workshops on gun maintenance just to--
--attract the FBI agents and keep them out of the real workshops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. I was in Boy Scout Troop 187 and we had WWII and Korean War veterans training us
Edited on Tue Jan-18-11 03:36 PM by bobthedrummer
but that has nothing to do with your reply to my post either eridani.

Here's something that does

THE PORT HURON STATEMENT of the STUDENTS for a DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY 1962
http://www.h-net.org/~hst306/documents/huron.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. That was a real work of political art
No internets tubes--just mimeographed paper with that fresh mimeograph scent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Smarmie Doofus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
16. Kick so I can find it later. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beringia Donating Member (193 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
20. Did you do the interview by phone
and then transcribe it?

Thanks for the interview.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janet118 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
21. Can't wait for MORE. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janet118 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
23. Question: What did the Weathermen think of the Yippie movement?
To me, it always seemed like the Weathermen resorted to guerrilla violence and the Yippies resorted to guerrilla comedy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. The YIPPIES
used monkey warfare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kayob1 Donating Member (116 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
24. Thanks for posting n/m
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
27. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
molly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. Thank you H20 man, Chloe and Mark Rudd,
Chloe's remarks helped me to understand you and your family. Nice touch.More interviews for DU? Brilliant. And so fitting since newspapers are dying and the internet is getting more important daily.

Question: Sidney Portier stated on Bill Maher that we had to figure out a new way to fight.Do you think seeking bipartisanship is a new way? Or capitulation to corporations?

A Greek friend said that " ancients believed when their people wanted power for the sake of greed etc, give them as much as they want...you say give them enough rope and they will hang themselves." Hope I made that clear.

I think that is what I am seeing with the republican party. Reminds me of an Ani De Franco song.."you seem like a photograph of yourself". They are taking on an air of unreality.I certainly do not think this is a reason to just sit back, but more to start a third party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JonLP24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
29. K&R
Thanks for doing this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
30. Outstanding!
Thank you.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
32. Kick. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BobbyBoring Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
33. Thanks H2O Man
I would be interested in knowing how many DUers were around in those days. We didn't have nearly the communication power that we have now but we managed to get thousands of people together with little effort and we need to do it again.

I think the main difference between then and now is there is a high level of apathy in America. Far too many of our citizens either don't know or don't care. We also have a lack of Abbie Hoffmans and Tom Haydens, read guys with balls that believed in something. People should be out in the streets at least once a month until this madness in the Middle East ends but they're not. Yes, support for the wars are fading but the youth of America should be screaming bloody murder because that's what it is and WHEN the draft starts again, they will be the ones doing the dying~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wizard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. There's no draft today
Back then everyone either had skin in the game or the risk thereof.
If I had it to do again I would piss on the doctor during the physical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BobbyBoring Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #36
44. Yeah,
That's what I'm saying. I didn't even make it to the physical. My reefer bust turned my lucky lottery number 41 (on the boat) to a 4F in short order. And to think I was one of the lucky ones.

I think a draft with NO EXCEPTIONS would go a long way to restoring sanity to the way we fight wars of our choosing~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wizard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 06:11 AM
Response to Reply #44
54. The draft might also
go a long way in eliminating gang activity. In many ways military training give a person a self worth not previously realized.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janet118 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #36
62. I agree . . . the existence of a draft did a few things
It gave a unifying issue to everyone of draft age - end the war.

It fostered a military that consisted of many reluctant warriors who caused dissension within the ranks.

It created an "outlaw" class of draft dodgers who went underground.

It made the war real - a life-or-death decision for young men without the influence to get out of the draft. It also affected their family and friends.

Colleges were filled with students who were on draft-deferred status. Often the loss of a scholarship or bad grades meant going to Vietnam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
naaman fletcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
34. mark rudd was a pussy
Despite what he tells you, he was a pussy. He would gather up impressionable students and then sneak away to avoid getting arrested. Once he took over Low library at Columbia and did the usual bit. tauting the cops, etc. well, he let the impressionable students get arrested. he snuck out.

He did the same thing during a protest on broadway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #34
38. LOL! You take his picture, did you?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
naaman fletcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #38
47. It's in the newspaper archives at Columbia
I have read them. You have not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #47
50. I recently invited
an old friend to go to the induction ceremonies at the Boxing Hall of Fame with me. Since he is a former world champion, holding a title in the 1960s, it would seem like fun, wouldn't it?

He told me no, that the last two times he went, one fellow he had defeated in the early '60s still held a grudge. This fellow -- who I like quite a bit -- still complains about the way the decision went. And that kind of ruins it for my friend, by contaminating the atmosphere.

I'm old enough, and familiar enough with that era, that I can remember that Mark Rudd -- just the same as virtually every other leader from that era -- was at times controversial. And I suppose that if we want to, we could even argue about what hair style he favored.

What is beyond debate is that this man was, and is, brilliant. And he played an important role in that essential decade. It really doesn'tmatter if you like the descriptions of his leadership style, or if I favored the YIPPIE's monkey warfare to the actions of the Weather Underground .... any more than the judges' score cards in 1962 matter.

The important thing is that we have an interview with someone who was not only important then, but who has learned a great deal about politics and society, and who is willing to share some of his thoughts with the members of this forum.

I'm hoping that I can follow up with similar interviews with other influential people. That includes people I like, and some I don't especially care for. Likewise, you might like or dislike others. That is an important part of political/social discourse. And certainly, you are both welcome and encouraged to post any of your interviews, etc, on DU. That's what it's all about.

Peace,
H2O Man
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
naaman fletcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #50
51. thanks...
and I do appreciate your interview, and he is a brilliant man. keep up the good work!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #51
53. Glad to!
Thanks, Friend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
35. Outstanding. I'm not quite old enough to have real memories of the times
I'd like to ask about this statement:

I have a lot of hopes for President Obama as a leader, but we need to give him a movement to lead.

My question is, isn't that a little ass backwards? Shouldn't a leader be calling for the movement to be joined, to rally to them?

It seems to me that if the President called for us to pressure anyone about anything there would be a massive response. I think if he had laid out a public health care plan and called for popular support we would be much farther along than where we ended up. Then again if I was that smart about that, I guess I would be the leader, lol.

I'm off to the google regarding the SNCC. ;)

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TBF Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #35
48. No, I think Rudd is right about that - Obama works for the wealthy. He is not going to be
a leader for workers' rights in that role. He can be forced to do things though - the way FDR was. In a round about way Obama may have been telling us that when he said "make me do it". It is the only way it can work absent revolution. If enough pressure is put on the very wealthy, if they are in fear, they might give a bit. It worked when FDR was president because the communist party had made inroads with labor. Today we don't have that. Unless we build it ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
37. "I have a lot of hopes for President Obama as a leader, but we need to give him a movement to lead."
Quite an interesting statement. It speaks to the fundamentals of democracy. It is we who are sovereign--we the people. Obama and every other public official is our servant. And if WE don't demand social justice, peace and democracy, nobody's going to give those things to us and it ain't gonna happen. In fact, if we the people remain passive and feeling powerless and feeling oh-so-sorry for ourselves, that our government is not giving us social justice, peace, democratic rights and whatever else "we the people" require, then our rulers will continue systematically taking all those things away, and anything else gained by past struggles--labor rights, decent wages, safe workplaces, educational opportunity, fair taxation, equality before the law, Social Security.

They will take them away. They ARE taking them away, due to our passivity.

I think that a very special effort has been made to propagandize and brainwash but most of all to disempower the American people precisely because we are a progressive people and a potentially great force for social justice and peace in the world. This is the best way to control us--illusions, delusions, relentless often clever propaganda (less and less clever, though) that induces passivity, and the chipping away at our rights and our achieved benefits, one by one, with rather a big chunk ripped out by the Bush Junta. Habeas corpus, gone. Transparent vote counting, gone. Solvency of our education system, social welfare and other "common good" programs, gone. Next, security for the elderly, paid for by the elderly themselves, all their lives, in a protected government fund, on the chopping block.

I frankly don't know what it will take to arouse our people from their sleep in the corpo-fascist news "river of forgetfulness." We're getting down to bare bones now--having a home, having a job, having a future for your children. We're down to food on the table, for many Americans. Stripped of our rights and quite deliberately, systematically stripped of our prosperity and our right to an even minimally decent life. What is the breaking point? I don't know. But I hope to God that a social justice movement rises to this challenge and can restore our democracy because, if it doesn't, there is likely going to be bloody rebellion and very bloody repression.

I also think that conditions are in many ways far different from those in the '60s--and much more difficult as to organizing movements. Mark says that he's proud that we stopped an unjust war. But we really didn't. it went on and on and on for more than a decade, in which 2 million Southeast Asians were slaughtered and more than 55,000 U.S. soldiers lost their lives. But what is worse--what is the biggest failure of our generation--is that we did not dismantle the "military-industrial complex" or even try to. It may have been utter demoralization--the combined impact of the assassinations of John Kennedy, Robert Kennedy and Martin Luther King, in the space of five years. (James Douglass' book, "JFK and the Unspeakable: Why He Died And Why It Matters," is an brilliant book on this subject--why it STILL matters.) In any case, our failure to address--or even try to address--the REAL problem--the war machine albatross on our country's back from WW II--led straight to the Bush Junta, with damn few interregnums of decent government in between.

Now this war machine is absolutely out of control. I think that our generation accomplished a lot--but in a way we couldn't see the forest for the trees. We ACCEPTED the "military-industrial complex" and mostly just sought to secure individual rights and a decent life within it. We needed to question it fundamentally and change it profoundly. The "powers that be" were very clever, in this regard. They ended the Draft.

So now we're stuck with an out of control military machine that has fully combined forces with out of control multinational corporations including a uniformly controlled, propagandizing corpo-fascist press. People are beaten down and demoralized and don't have a clue on the most fundamental mechanisms of control, such as the 'TRADE SECRET' voting machines! How could people put up with that in a democracy? Because they mostly don't know!

My vision of a social movement that could turn all this around, without bloodshed, starts with the 'TRADE SECRET' voting machines. Got to have a REAL "Boston Tea Party"--not this fake thing funded by the Koch brothers--and throw these diabolical machines "into the harbor." Good God, we have one, far rightwing-connected corporation--ES&S which just bought out Diebold--controlling 80% of the voting systems in the country, with machines run on programming code that "we, the people" are forbidden to review, and with virtually no audit/recount controls.

It's the elephant in the room! We've got to start there--with the PUBLIC counting of our votes. People wonder how these corrupt rightwing scumbags could have gotten control of Congress? For Pete's sake, look who's 'counting' all the votes with 'TRADE SECRET' code!

And with this realization--WHO is 'counting' all the votes in their smelly tech dungeon in Omaha--that is, the realization that a business corporation has no place between us and the counting of our votes--the notion will spread that corporations are grossly interfering in our public life, in every way--including, for instance, with their Forever War--a private military boondoggle that is literally sucking the life out of our country--and their corrupt, murderous, failed "war on drugs"--the backup war boondoggle, and one of the chief means of stripping us of our civil rights as well.

'TRADE SECRET' voting 'counting' is the paradigm of it all. It IS "Corporate Rule."

And it is also something that MOST Americans would oppose--if they knew about it. And once we get back control of the vote count, and are able to start electing decent, honest representatives, once again, we can proceed with real reform on other issues. We are absolutely powerless to address any other issue until we can put real representatives in office.

There are a lot of ways that real representation is denied to us. But this is the capper--the final blow to our most fundamental right, and our most fundamental act as citizens. It is the basis of democracy. It is the way we temporarily pass our sovereign power, as a people, to our representatives. And IT has been hijacked!

It won't solve everything. But it is the essential first step to having any democratic control at all over our government and our leaders.

You can put a million bodies--or two million, or three million--around the Washington Monument--to protest the looting of Social Security--and it will do NOTHING to move them! Nothing! They are going to do what they are going to do. That is the whole point of the 'TRADE SECRET' voting machines. They no longer have to care. There are no consequences. Washington has become an armed fortress, anyway--so good luck with '60s type protests. It worked then, to lop a year or two off the slaughter in Vietnam. It won't work now. They've got it all figured out.

And that is another reason that I think the 'TRADE SECRET' voting machines should be the focus. The Anthrax Congress never mandated e-voting. This coup was accomplished entirely by a $3.9 billion e-voting boondoggle and filthy lobbying. The power to choose voting systems still resides at the local/state level, where ordinary people still have potential influence, and there is no federal law saying that we must choose e-voting. Hand-counted paper ballots or OPEN SOURCE code voting machines are still possible without an act of Congress.

If the rats that have seized Congress change this, then civil disobedience may be needed. But right now, all that's needed is overwhelming citizen support at the local/state level for the PUBLIC counting of our votes.

That's my contribution to this wonderful thread! Thank you, H20 Man and Mark!

:hi: :patriot: :grouphug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
molly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #37
43.  I hear you.
Got to have a REAL "Boston Tea Party"--not this fake thing funded by the Koch brothers--and throw these diabolical machines "into the harbor." Good God, we have one, far rightwing-connected corporation--ES&S which just bought out Diebold--controlling 80% of the voting systems in the country, with machines run on programming code that "we, the people" are forbidden to review, and with virtually no audit/recount controls.

A real Boston Tea Party .....with Willie Nelson? I'd go. If I had to camp out in the middle of winter.

We can't have freedom unless we have fair elections.You said it all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #37
56. "I have a lot of hopes for President Obama as a leader, but we need to give him a movement to lead."
That's an interesting statement. Your response is interesting and spot on.

Quite an interesting statement. It speaks to the fundamentals of democracy. It is we who are sovereign--we the people. Obama and every other public official is our servant. And if WE don't demand social justice, peace and democracy, nobody's going to give those things to us and it ain't gonna happen. In fact, if we the people remain passive and feeling powerless and feeling oh-so-sorry for ourselves, that our government is not giving us social justice, peace, democratic rights and whatever else "we the people" require, then our rulers will continue systematically taking all those things away, and anything else gained by past struggles--labor rights, decent wages, safe workplaces, educational opportunity, fair taxation, equality before the law, Social Security.

They will take them away. They ARE taking them away, due to our passivity.

How many times has the point been made only to be met with "I did my part."

There is no Progressive movement. Cornel West on video: The Precarious Fate of Barack Obama

Transcript:

Cornel West: I think that my dear brother Barack Obama, President Obama, he's a very complicated fellow. He has a sterling democratic rhetoric at his best that reminds you of Saul Alinsky and the others at times. He has a technocratic team when it comes to policy, so there's not just a tension but oftentimes there's contradictions between the two, you see. He comes out of a black tradition that has been explicit about telling the truth about white supremacy, but he himself holds race at arm's length until there's a crisis: Jamal right here, and Skip Gates there, you see. And it's partly because he's such a masterful politician. He's brilliant, he's charismatic, he's a masterful politician. And he's concerned about cutting the deal and winning the election. And I think in the end this is going to be a major challenge for him.

He has to decide whether he wants to be an Abe Lincoln, who began as a mediocre politician -- remember, Abe Lincoln supported the first proposed thirteenth Amendment that set slavery for ever in the U.S. Constitution. Frederick Douglas bought a ticket to go to Haiti; he said, I would never live in a nation that has an unamendable amendment. Lincoln supported that. That was opportunistic at the core; he hated slavery, but he was willing to say keep these people in slavery for ever to preserve the union. You see, that's not the Lincoln that we talk about as great. Lincoln became great because of Harriet Beecher Stowe, Wendell Phillips, Charles Sumner, who was beat up by Preston Brooks from South Carolina, Frederick Douglas, Sojourner Truth, Harriet Tubman. It was the abolitionist movement that helped make Lincoln great. Barack Obama has a choice between the greatness of a Lincoln and the masterful Machiavellian sensibilities of a Bill Clinton, who was brilliant, charismatic, masterful, but tended to be too opportunistic. So far, Barack Obama has leaned more toward the Clinton side than the Lincoln side. That was partly because he doesn't have an abolitionist movement equivalent. He doesn't have a social movement. That's what we need to do: we need to put pressure on him.

Question: What would this effort look like?

Cornel West: Well, it's a very good question. I mean, the kind of thing you're doing here on the Internet is very important, because it won't take the old traditional form of just hitting the streets. Hitting the streets will be one form; it's got to take a whole host of different forms, different voices, different views, different visions put forward, critiques of what's going on behind the scenes to reveal the contradictions of the Obama administration. We need young people who are looking at the world through a very different set of lenses than even myself, because I'm old-school, you know. And no school has the monopoly on truth. Yes, I do still see classes, and I see empires and so forth and so on. But there's also ways of looking at the world through popular culture that young people have that I don't fully understand, so that some of their criticisms would take forms that it will take me time to understand and grasp, you see. But we have to have the courage to not just raise our voices, but connect into organizations so that people can begin to see there are alternatives than the old neoliberalism dressed up in fashionable form, with a democratic rhetoric that hides a concealed technocratic policy. And it could be that, you know, Barack Obama himself, you know, he's waiting to make his turn toward Lincolnesque greatness. He hasn't made it yet, and of course the decision on Afghanistan is going to be very important. It's going to be difficult to have a peace prize and be a war president.


Spot on. Two years into this Presidency, where's the movement? There is a lot of criticism, some of it bordering on disdain for the man, but not a lot of action. It has gotten to the point where groups that are taking action are being labeled sellouts.

Passive, angry criticism isn't going to change much, but organizing can make a difference.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #56
61. Only problem is Obama's FBI will show up and seize your computer..
..trash your house, and arrest you for being a terrorist.

Bummer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #61
65. Yes,
Edited on Wed Jan-19-11 11:48 AM by ProSense
that's realistic.

Actually sounds like another excuse for remaining passive.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #65
66. OK, you've missed a lot of shit.
Of course, it hasn't been in the "news" much, so that's forgivable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-11 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #61
70. Webster Green, my point is that "V" won't work at the Washington Monument but it can still work at
your local county registrar of voters, and, if there were little "V" actions at a thousand county registrars' offices across the land, we can get rid of the 'TRADE SECRET' voting machines plus educating people on the wider meaning of this voting machine coup. (Corporations have hijacked everything.)

The power to choose voting systems remains at the state/local level, where ordinary people still have potential influence and still have some access. Your county registrar may live down the street from you. For most Americans, their state capitol is not that far away, and, in any case, your state legislative reps are more accessible and influenceable than your congress person. President and congress cannot be influenced any more. Local officials can be.

In addition, protest against 'TRADE SECRET' voting machines is a PRACTICAL protest. It has a clear object--not just general protest against war, or whatever. And MOST Americans would object to 'TRADE SECRET' voting machines, if they knew about them. More knowledge about this matter and effective action, ALSO highlights Corporate Rule and its OTHER evils, and can snowball to other issues.

A protest against the RNC or the DNC or the WTO is comparable to a "march on Washington." They may have occurred in non-DC venues but they were opposing the same unmovable entities--the president, congress, the national political establishment. I don't think that the same Darth Vader forces would be brought to bear on a hundred people at a county registrar's demanding transparent vote counting. And the FBI would be overwhelmed to try to "investigate" and harass even a hundred such actions across the land.

Give local police and officials nothing to object to. Entirely peaceful. And, unless and until this scumbag congress closes this loophole--that power over voting systems remains local--it does not even have to involve civil disobedience. Just, a hundred people show up at the county registrar's office, for instance, or picket his/her home, demanding transparent vote counting.

Organizing and news could be done on Twitter, making the local propaganda arms of the corpo-fascist 'news' monopolies (TV, radio, newsrags) irrelevant.

A DISPERSED protest--but widespread, everywhere, in many counties and states.

It would also need to be persistent, over time, and get big enough to make it impossible for local county registrars, local supervisors or state reps to ignore.

No righteous protest is ever useless, even if it's small--one or two people--or very big but aimed at immovable objects. I admire and honor all such protests (and have participated in more than one, myself, recently and way back when). But I think we need to get practical and aim for the mechanics of power--the secret voting machines. With transparent vote counting, we have the chance to start changing things. Without it, we have no chance and all the street protest in the world against immovable, insulated targets is just beating your head against a brick wall.

I am describing something, and envisioning something, that not only has aspects of very modern organization--dispersed protest organized by Twitter--but it also has a lot of similarities to the quite effective civil rights movement of the 1960s. That movement was LOCAL. It targeted LOCAL entities--the local Woolworth five and dime lunch counter, the local bus service, and, in 1965, the local county registrars where black citizens were being denied the right to vote by local officials. The movement ILLUSTRATED the righteousness of their cause, as manifested in these local venues, and were very practical in their goals--to be able to eat as paying customers where everybody else eats, to be able to vote just like everybody else. In the case of lunch counters/ bus service, they had economic power to exercise. In the case of voting rights, they had peacefulness and numbers and ultimately the support of the federal government opposing local bigots.

A difference between M L King and movement, and what I am envisioning, is that we won't have the federal government supporting our voting rights. Our Democrat Party leaders have thoroughly betrayed us on this. But we might be able to turn the pyramid upside down, with local officials of our choosing, or who have been successfully pressured to be on our side, opposing federal policy on our behalf.

It is interesting, in this regard, that the reason that the Anthrax Congress did NOT mandate e-voting--that is, the reason that this coup had to be and was accomplished entirely by a $3.9 billion e-voting boondoggle and filthy lobbying--is that local officials opposed such a mandate. They wanted to retain local control. So there is potential to turn things around--to achieve local government support in opposition to federal tyranny.

Another parallel is the anti-war movement of the 1960s, which had aspects of both beating its head against a brick wall (the "military-industrial complex"--an immovable object) AND a specific target--the Draft. It lost against the brick wall and won on the specific target--the Draft. That movement provides a lesson in NOT settling for lesser goals. We want...

--restoration of TRANSPARENT vote counting--vote counting in the PUBLIC venue

--removal of private corporations from EVERY aspect of the voting process

--removal of private corporations, secret donors, and perhaps ALL private money from political campaigns

--use of our public airwaves for (real) public debate

--restoration of some form of the Fairness Doctrine (to earn a broadcasting license, corps have to provide balanced political coverage and public service)

--busting up of media monopolies

--breakup of the "Republicrat" grip on power

--etc., etc, etc.

The anti-war movement of the 1960s was driven by the Draft and ultimately died off, when the Draft was revoked. This was the biggest failure of my generation--not dismantling the "military-industrial complex" when we had the chance. Whether we could have or not is an open question. But we didn't really try. We settled for the status quo as long as military service was "voluntary." Another, related failure was our inability to challenge and expose the forces behind the assassinations of JFK, RFK and MLK. Whether we could have ripped the veil off the CIA* is also an open question. And people did try. But most people settled for the status quo and that was possibly the biggest mistake this country and its people ever made.

So that's a lesson we must heed. Seek practical, achievable goals--but don't settle for those goals. Keep going until democracy is fully restored and established and the mechanisms of people power are firmly in place (and never stop trying to perfect it).

One of the ugly truths behind LBJ's support of the civil rights movement may be that he and the MIC needed "cannon fodder" and had to convince young black men that they were acceptable Americans and should serve in the military. I think M L King eventually realized this and took on the war itself (in his stunning Riverside Church speech in New York). That may have been his death sentence. Similar situations may have brought about both the JFK and RFK assassinations (JFK balking at the Joint Chiefs/CIA pressure to nuke Russia in a pre-emptive strike and his peace plan to be unveiled in the 1964 election*, and RFK's decision to champion the anti-war cause in the 1968 election*).

In any case, we have to realize that any successful, effective movement against our Corporate Rulers and War Profiteers is a dangerous. The 'TRADE SECRET' voting machines are a key mechanism of control--the final coup d'etat by which they have installed the Scumbag Congress and will oust Obama and install Bush Junta II (if he gives them any reason to).

A movement against the 'TRADE SECRET' voting machines thus needs to be leaderless and dispersed, as well as that being the best way to approach it--at the local level--with simultaneous little movements erupting like mushrooms all over the land. It has to be and needs to be a broad-based citizen movement. Individual "mushrooms" might be squelched. The whole phenomenon cannot be squelched, or cannot be easily squelched. And its goal--if successful--our being able to elect honest people to office--will give us increasing abilities to open up our government--investigate, remove malefactors--and to begin a serious reform movement.

We have Latin America as a guide, and as hope that what I am proposing can be done. FIRST, they reformed the election system. THEN they started electing real representatives of the people and now have leftist, "New Deal"-type governments in Brazil, Venezuela, Bolivia, Ecuador, Argentina, Paraguay (!), Uruguay, Nicaragua, El Salvador and Guatemala, with an almost in Mexico in 2005, and a leftist president in Honduras until the U.S.-supported rightwing coup. (Chile's recent vote for a rightwinger may have been a reflection of "centrist"/compromising nature of the Chile's socialists. It is an anomaly. The left is on the rise, region-wide--as exemplified by the recent election of a former leftist guerrilla as president of Brazil.)

The key has been honest, transparent elections. (They have horrible corpo-fascist media in Latin America but, with honest vote counts, the left can outflank the right with grass roots organization, despite the media.) Latin Americans worked on this for a decade before real change began. PATIENCE may be something else we need to learn them.

----

*("JFK and the Unspeakable: Why He Died And Why It Matters," by James Douglass. Very important book. And he has two more in progress--on RFK and MLK.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
39. THANKS so much for this...
VERY interesting! :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rosesaylavee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
40. Intrigued from just the little I have found on Ella J. Baker
from Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ella_Baker

"..."Participatory Democracy"In 1960s, the idea of "Participatory Democracy" was created. The meaning of this was bringing together a new formulation for the traditional appeal of democracy with an innovative tie to broader participation. There were three primary emphases to this new movement: (1) an appeal for grass roots involvement of people throughout society, while making their own decisions, (2) the minimization of (bureaucratic) hierarchy and the associated emphasis on expertise and professionalism as a basis for leadership, and (3) a call for direct action as an answer to fear isolation and intellectual detachment.<4> Ella Baker said herself,

You didn't see me on television, you didn't see news stories about me. The kind of role that I tried to play was to pick up pieces or put together pieces out of which I hoped organization might come. My theory is, strong people don't need strong leaders.<5>"

*******************

And I esp like #3 from above re direct action. Will have to find something at the Library on her work.

You asked great questions - wonderful interview and looking forward to Part 2.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidthegnome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
41. Great job, thank you
Edited on Tue Jan-18-11 07:08 PM by davidthegnome
for taking the time and effort to do this.

I only really have one thing to say - on behalf of the young people in this Country (I think I still qualify as one at 26) is that yes, we are facing overwhelming apathy. That doesn't mean we don't care or that we're not trying - what it primarily means is that we're overwhelmed, first off with just trying to get by today, secondly with the number of social and economic issues facing our Nation and the world at this time. In the 60s, mass communication was there, but not in comparison to what we have today via the internet. The news we watch or often read (those of us who can stomach it) tends to be full of negative stories about every terrible thing happening in the world today - though I suppose that has always been the case, today I believe we have many more disturbing and negative stories to share given the more globally available media. The sheer volume of information available - and who to trust for it, that itself is often overwhelming.

The youth of this Country did do it's part in helping secure Obama's election, but I agree that we need to do more. The question is what - and how. I certainly don't have the solution/s up my sleeve and I don't expect anyone else to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
42. Part 2 Please
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #42
52. Part 2 is complete .....
and will be posted tomorrow morning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doremus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
45. Fantastic interview, thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
46. K&R! Excellent! //nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
49. Chomsky
Yeah, when a TV talking head slams Noam I don't need a roadmap to know where he/she is trying to lead me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Little Star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
55. That was very well done! I await part two. Thanks. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cate94 Donating Member (573 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
57. K & R
Thanks for doing this H20 Man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
58. OMG, I am indebted to you forever H20 Man for putting this on DU where I can read it.
This is the type of interview that really rocks.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #58
59. Thanks!
I just posted Part Two. I hope that you enjoy it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
handmade34 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
60. Thank you
and nnw off to read #2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #60
63. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
64. Link to Part 2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellerpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
67. This is a tremendously exciting interview.
I look forward to the second part. Growing up in a Red State, I avidly read the "Revolution" paperbacks published in the late 60-early 70s period featuring a compilation of essays by many talented, thoughtful activists of the time, Rudd and Hoffman included. Those books were kind of a meeting point at that time like DU is today. I especially like the idea that We, the People present the President with an agenda of a way forward so that he can lead us where we want to go. The laws in the USA are now (for all the talk and weaponry to the contrary) much weaker in its protection of ordinary citizens. Maybe the first step, or demand we should make, should be for the restoration of our rights and autonomy. We have to be able to speak out without fear of reprisal if we are going to stop wars, end exploitation, and build a future based in peace. :kick: & Recommend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
68. Thank you. That was excellent. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
69. Thanks, H2O Man. Great interview.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC