California Congressional Representatives Letter to President Obama on Medical Marijuana Crackdown

[The Straight Story]

ear President Obama,

We write to express our concern with the recent activity by the Department of Justice against legitimate medical cannabis dispensaries in California that are operating legally under state law. As you know, in October of 2009, Attorney General Eric Holder issued formal guidelines for federal prosecutors in states that have enacted laws authorizing the use of cannabis for medical purposes. The guidelines were spelled out in a memo to United States Attorneys from then Deputy Attorney General David Ogden, saying in part that the Attorneys should not focus federal resources in their state “on individuals whose actions are in clear and unambiguous compliance with existing state laws providing for the medical use of marijuana.”

Despite this guidance and further clarification from current Deputy Attorney General James Cole that it would not be “an efficient use of federal resources to focus enforcement efforts on individuals with cancer or other serious illnesses who use marijuana as part of a recommended treatment regimen consistent with applicable state law, or their caregivers,” the Justice Department has continued an active role in enforcing federal laws against individuals acting in accordance with California state law. Last week, California’s four U.S. attorneys held a press conference to speak about the letters their offices had sent out to dozens of landlords and property owners who rent buildings or land where dispensaries provide safe and legal access to medical cannabis, notifying them that they are violating federal drug laws.

The U.S. attorney letters state that federal law “takes precedence over state law and applies regardless of the particular uses for which a dispensary is selling and distributing marijuana.” The letters warn that the dispensaries must shut down within 45 days or the landlords and property owners will face criminal charges and confiscation of their property – both “real and personal” – even if they are operating legally under the state’s medical cannabis law. The actions mandated in these letters and echoed at the ensuing press conference directly interfere with California’s 15 year old medical cannabis law by eliminating safe access to medication for the state’s thousands of medical cannabis patients.

We are also aware that these threats by the Justice Department against property owners in California come after many months of federal interference in other medical cannabis states. This year alone has seen aggressive SWAT-style federal raids in at least seven medical marijuana states, as well as threats of criminal prosecution by U.S. attorneys against local and state public officials. It is our strong position that local and state governments must be allowed to develop, implement and enforce their own public health laws with regard to medical cannabis.

Medical cannabis has been and continues to be recommended by physicians to alleviate a number of serious illnesses and medical conditions that have not responded to other medications and treatments. During your presidential campaign, you repeatedly pledged to end federal raids against the individuals and collectives authorized by state law to use or provide medical cannabis, giving hope to patients who legitimately use medical cannabis to treat their conditions that their long struggle to safely access their medicine was finally over. By pursuing the same harsh policies that have been in place for years, we fear that the federal government will push legitimate patients back into the uncertainty and danger of the illicit market.

For these reasons, it is more urgent now than ever to reschedule marijuana as a legitimate controlled substance for medicinal purposes. Classifying marijuana as a Schedule II or III drug will have the effect of harmonizing federal law with the laws of several states, such as California. No longer should the federal government’s laws supersede the wishes of local citizens who have decided that their fellow neighbors ought to have the right to legitimately use medical marijuana. As we have seen for years, seriously ill patients will attempt to obtain their medication however they can and it is unconscionable for the DOJ to use its limited resources to endanger the lives of patients who are simply seeking to ease their suffering.

We respectfully request that your administration reschedule marijuana as a Schedule II or III drug administratively, or publicly support the adoption oflegislation that would change federal statute to achieve this same goal. One such proposal, H.R. 1983, the States’ Medical Marijuana Patient Protection Act, which was introduced by Congressman Barney Frank (D-MA) earlier this year, would do just this. Changing federal marijuana policy through legitimate administrative channels or Congressional action will give countless patients and their physicians the respect they deserve and will clear up any ambiguity as to what the legitimate role of the federal government is in this arena.

http://publicintelligence.net/california-congressional-representatives-letter-to-president-obama-on-medical-marijuana-crackdown/

[FirstLight]

1. good!

I wonder if it will make a dent though...

[Norrin Radd]

2. kr

[inna]

3. talk about fucked up priorities.

wtf is wrong with this admin, for crying outloud.

[Tsiyu]

4. The Feds need to focus on the thousands of deaths ANUALLY

from Big Pharma Products. But they can't pick on the ones who line their campaign coffers, can they? And they think we're too stupid to get that!!!!!

Obama has NOTHING to say about Big Pharma products killing thousands per year?

But his administration is going after Medical Cannabis which has killed no one?

Bizarro World, and another reason why Americans are growing fed up.

Just who is the Justice Department protecting? The American People?

Not a bit!

Shame on the President. It's really hard to support a leader who so clearly defies and mocks the will of the People, and who appears to put corporate profits over the safety of the American people.

Listen up, Obama. Get this right. Stop this crazy policy.

[Fumesucker]

5. They are lying, we know they are lying and they know we know they are lying..

"We can't make pot legal because it's addictive."

Seriously, not only is this wrong on the facts but a smart fifth grader with an elementary grasp of logic could destroy the argument in moments.

It's worse than dealing with fundies, fundies at least genuinely believe the gibberish they spout.

Who is it that that will lie to your face and then continue lying when both parties know the other knows?

I believe the term is "pathological liar".

[Tsiyu]

6. "Pathological liars" is right

They have counted on the stigma attached to cannabis use, and have used it to paint all users as dreamy ne'er-do-wells.

Except now, people from all walks of life, all socioeconomic levels, all levels of education find some relief in cannabis. Yet they still play this "For your own good, you silly stoners" routine. They need to give it up. They sound like off-the-chain idiots themselves.

I have a cannabis avatar in order to "normalize" the image. I think it's the most insane, inane thing to have a war on an herb, especially when pills are killing thousands every year.

[truedelphi]

7. Obama is only going to continue these policies.

Big Pharma knows how onerous and sad it will be for themselves when the public can turn to growing their own. And they have been studying the various cannibinoids for two decades, and want to patent those cannibinoids, get the cannabis to all be GMO's and make sure that they and they alone reap the monetary rewards.

Then there is the Big Prison Industry, and also all the banking people. One reason bankers don't want their companies audited is that they launder so much money from the drug dealers. In fact, in many cases, banks in certain areas of our nation are OWNED by the cartel family member that was willing to clean up and go north to the United States. And once ensconced with the financial crowd, that person has the money to buy up politicians, who promise to keep the drugs illegal.

[Mimosa]

9. TrueDelphi, that's what I wanted to know. Thanks!

I expected better from the President of the U.S. and his justice department.

[truedelphi]

10. In a very well researched crime novel from around 2006,

It was stated that one third of the economy of Mexico was related to tourism, one third to oil/resources and ONE THIRD of the economy was marijuana and cocaine!

Well I imagine that tourism dollars are down, as many who used to travel to Mexico were middle income and slightly above, and now cannot afford to travel. But the drug money has to go somewhere, and what better place to put it than in a North American bank.

[Mimosa]

8. See True delphi's post about who is profiting and why. Amazing.

Who is behind this destructive policy? And WHY? I'd asked.

True Deplhi answered here:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=439&topic_id=2233361&mesg_id=2240026

I haven't toked on a joint since I'd occasionally take a couple of tokes to alleviate extreme menstrual pain and accompanying nausea. Just a couple of tokes worked better to alleviate pain than Vicodin! I didn't get stoned because the marijuana acted as a medicine in that case.

I'd heard from OLD grannies that before marijuana was made illegal women used to occasionally use it in tea or smoke form for menstrual pain and cramps. I learned it was effective.

Everybody knows marijuana helps people who have cancer. Or AIDS.