Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ridiculous Man Seeks $52K to Recreate Wedding Pics With Ex-Wife

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 09:59 AM
Original message
Ridiculous Man Seeks $52K to Recreate Wedding Pics With Ex-Wife
Today the New York Times tells us the infuriating story of Todd J. Remis—a New York City man who is suing the studio H & H Photographers because he would like to recreate his wedding, and have it photographed the right way. He is being an idiot.

For one: Remis married his bride, lovely Latvian Milena Grzibovska, back in 2003. And he wants to sue now? And how. For two: He and Grzibovska are no longer married. They parted amicably, though! He would like to fly his ex-wife back to the United States, across the European continent and the expansive Atlantic Ocean, so she can once again wear her pretty white wedding dress and pose for another round of matrimonial photographs with her ex-husband, with whom she's no longer in love. It will be just like the first time, except with even more pressure for everyone to pose like they mean it and with none of the authentic "like they mean it"-ness.

In his suit, Remis seeks $4,100 for the actual photo costs plus $48,000 to fly Milena and the 40 original wedding guests back to New York to redo the whole ceremony. Why is this all necessary again? Because it is necessary:

(A) month after the wedding, when Mr. Remis returned to the studio to look over the proofs, he complained that the three-person crew had missed the last 15 minutes - the last dance and the bouquet toss. He noted in a deposition last July that the employees at H & H did not respond in a courtly fashion.

"I remember being yelled at more than I have ever been yelled at before," Mr. Remis said.

In his lawsuit, he also complained that the photographs were "unacceptable as to color, lighting, poses, positioning" and that a video, which he had expected to record the wedding's six hours, was only two hours long.

"I need to have the wedding recreated exactly as it was so that the remaining 15 percent of the wedding that was not shot can be shot," he testified.


Somewhere right now a tort reform advocate is writing a letter to his or her local elected representatives demanding that all civil courts be abolished immediately, based on this case.

http://gawker.com/5855941/ridiculous-man-seeks-52k-to-recreate-wedding-pics-with-ex+wife
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. Stupid doesn't even begin to describe him.
He needs serious therapy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
2. How ridiculous.
All I can say, is that I am glad that even the enticement of citizenship in this country wasn't enough to make this mail-order bride stay with this control freak. I hope she recovers from that experience without any permanent damage. Geesh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. I can't imagine any woman touching this guy after this stunt
he'll be paying cash up front for intimacy for the rest of his life...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
3. 2003? Statute of limitations...idiot...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. He originally filed in '09, just before the deadline
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. I still don't see how he could have filed in 2009 if this happened in 2003...
6 years is a long time, I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
4. He should spend his money on treatment for his world-class case of OCD
This guy *can't* be serious...He must be following through on a dare or a million-dollar gamble among his buddies or something...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dtexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
5. His former wife should seek $52k from him to recreate the divorce.
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marlakay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
9. He just wants money
wanting them to settle…beyond stupid…

I hope he gets stuck with lawyer costs…hopefully the judge will throw out. But if he had contract to do the stuff they missed company might have to pay a bit but not recreate a wedding that isn't no more!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
10. Tort reform unnecessary. The judge will file it circularly, with a chuckle.
I pity him. He sounds very unhappy and in need of psychiatric care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FSogol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
11. His ridiculous beef with the studio lasted long than his marriage.
Wonder why he got divorced? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Sounds like he answered one of those "Latvian Beauty Seeks Relationship" ads
She probably cleaned him out, and he's taking his stupidity out on a more accessible target.

Apparently he doesn't have a dog to kick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FSogol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Maybe I should answer one of those ads!
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NBachers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
13. Separated at birth? Todd Remis reminds me of Steven Gibson, CEO of Righthaven
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 02:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC