Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The solution to the nation’s health care crisis is staring everyone in the face.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 01:01 PM
Original message
The solution to the nation’s health care crisis is staring everyone in the face.


Health Care Solution is Simple: Single-Payer
by Dave Zweifel
November 3, 2011

The answer to the nation’s health care crisis is staring everyone in the face, yet as a country we continue to refuse to come to grips with it.

It is far from rocket science. What this country simply needs is a single-payer national health insurance program that covers all American citizens from the day they’re born to the day they die — just as other advanced countries have done for decades.

So what we have today is a system that costs Americans nearly double the cost of single-payer national health insurance — in short, Medicare for all — in countries like England, France, Germany, Canada and even China.

We could finance health care coverage for every American by taking the resources that employees and employers are pumping into the current broken system and still have money left over for a substantial tax cut, not to mention that it would put U.S. employers back on a level playing field with their competitors in the world market.

Read the full article at:

http://host.madison.com/ct/news/opinion/column/dave_zweifel/article_e26dbb61-a1d2-5a03-86b6-ff2e6524596f.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. Simple answer why we won't:
If there's one thing the 1%ers who rule America don't do, it's step on each other's toes. Anything that affects even cent ONE of anyone's profits . . . verboten. Big Pharma and Big Insurance have such a stranglehold on Washington; single payer is never going to see the light of day.

Competition is for the underlings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. And they've convinced a HUGE number of people that socialism is evil. That sickens me as much
as anything, the manipulating people into standing against their own best interest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
44. Socialism = evil: unfettered and wholly corrupted capitalism nee fascism=
very, very good. :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MODem75 Donating Member (120 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #44
96. I would rather have Socialism than Fascism
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #96
98. In 21st-century America, socialism is bad, very bbbad; fascism, good, very
gggood indeed. :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemperEadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #3
64. thankfully
the majority of people who believe that are older and their numbers are thinning out daily. The younger people, by and large, don't see a problem with socialism, especially when it comes to dealing with the greater good, and in that, I am hopeful.

The younger people are less likely to be scared into stupidity thinking like their grandparents were during the "cold war" years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tansy_Gold Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #64
71. You're wrong, absolutely wrong
There is a very healthy and active propaganda machine that recruits and indoctrinates new believers every day. The "older generation" is not dying out at all, at least not without passing on its message to the younger generations coming up.

Never ever ever believe that an idea dies with its adherents. They just pass the message along.


TG
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemperEadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #71
86. I dont' believe I am.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #3
79. The real quandary is why people who are suffering because of our health care support it
It astounds me the people who think we have a great health care system when they are themselves victims of the corporate greed and their bean counter methods of treatment.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
49. Unless WE stop doing business as usual and vote out their puppets
if we keep supporting the "lesser of evils" nothing will change. We DO have a choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. Well, yeah, we have a choice.
Edited on Thu Nov-03-11 09:52 PM by HughBeaumont
We unfortunately just don't have the numbers of convinced voters FOR that choice.

That's a two-part problem: Money in politics, Big Media in politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemperEadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #50
65. I think OWS movement is changing that.
Way too many people are hurting now, more than there were a year ago--Tuesday, wasn't it?-- when those ignorant tea thugs were voted into congress and began the destruction in earnest of this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #49
88. What Lorien said /\ It is time to quit settling for the "lesser of two evils"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 07:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
60. Many years ago I remember hearing that there were companies coming out for single payer,
large ones too, because of the costs to them in paying for their employees' health care. That disappeared. I guess someone "explained" to them why that wasn't a good idea.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #60
75. See, you know how people tell us . . .
. . . "The notion that all wealthy people are conspiring with each other to rig the system in their favor at the expense of the middle/working/poor is just a myth, a wacky conspiracy theory."

Is it?

http://www.theyrule.net/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. And yet they weren't "in the room"
The advocates of single payer were literally removed "from the room" during congressional hearings. And our progressive president declared single payer "unworkable" and metaphorically kept them "from the table" during negotiations with the health care industry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yep. Gotta love that kind of progressivism. *sigh*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 07:12 AM
Response to Reply #4
55. And transparency (he denied it until he could no longer). *sigh*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DirkGently Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. Should have started with Medicare for All in the first place. It's coming, b/c there is no choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
26. It's coming? I'd really love to believe that, but cuts to Medicare and
defunding tactics won't allow me too. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DirkGently Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. Well, a lot of poor & middle-class people may have to die first.
Edited on Thu Nov-03-11 03:04 PM by DirkGently
... but we really have no alternative. Insurance premiums cannot continue to go up 20% per year, while the quality of care goes down because providers are being strangled at the other end. We're already close to a point where no one really has meaningful healthcare, unless they fall under some special provision somewhere, or can flat-out pay for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TE Lawrence Donating Member (5 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. It sounds nice, but what other advanced countries have done for decades
is bankrupting those countries.

When something is "free," no one cares how much is costs or how much they consume. It is unworkable and therefore, not a solution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. What a crock of shit
And what an incredibly lame defense of the status quo :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Better medical care for our people bankrupts us..
Than dropping bombs on other people bankrupts us like what's happening now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TE Lawrence Donating Member (5 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. Bomb dropping of late has surely been a stupid policy.
But one stupid policy does not justify another.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. You're going to get stupid policies no matter what you do..
That's the nature of politics..

Better to optimize the benefit to the public from stupid policies than optimize the harm like the USA is doing now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #18
45. So policies that benefit working class people and the elderly are stupid.

And economic policies that benefit the economic parasites at the top are really smart.

Where did you read that?

It's all about class.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mimosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. LOL
I doubt T.E. Lawrence would have used that right wing talking point.:7

Preventative care keeps costs down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TE Lawrence Donating Member (5 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. Preventative care can be an 81mg aspirin per day.
A two year supply is $6 under personal care.

Under single payer it would likely cost $6 per day or more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mimosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. People anywhere can buy their own aspirin
You are a citizen of the UK according to your profile.

Many of us have friends in the UK and/or Canada and have some knowledge of how your systems work. And what the problems are.

Why are you posting against single payer health care systems on a US Democratic liberal board?

You do understand that if and when the US adapts a single payer system for health care it may not be exactly like yours, which is run by 'trusts', some better than others, some not good at all?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sibelian Donating Member (543 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #22
35. We have a very small number of anti-NHS agitators in the UK.

They are small in number and unimpressive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #20
31. I've been to the UK and patronized their pharmacies
There's nothing to prevent people there from buying their own aspirin.

They aren't forced to take it from the NHS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sibelian Donating Member (543 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #20
34. ...

what?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 07:16 AM
Response to Reply #20
57. What? Prove that. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemperEadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #57
67. he can't... he's talking out of his ass
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbtries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 07:28 AM
Response to Reply #20
61. lol
joke, right? i spent, i don't know, maybe a couple bucks on 1000 aspirin tablets and take one a day. over two years' worth. that's not changing. aspirin is cheap and readily available.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemperEadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #20
66. got a link to back that up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tkmorris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. Absolute nonsense
Edited on Thu Nov-03-11 01:29 PM by tkmorris
They all spend less per capita on health care than we do. That isn't an opinion, it's a fact. If we adopted a single-payer system we would spend less than we do right now, by a significant amount.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. That is why we spend double per capita than Canada
The closest to us in spending level...

Nice talking point there though...oh and Canadians also have a higher life expectancy too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denverbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. That's nutty.
I've had health insurance that was completely free to me before. No copay, no deductibles. But I didn't go to the doctor every day just because it was free. Who would get medical care just because it's free? Why go to the doctor's office and sit around all the people hacking and sneezing if you don't need to go there?

Also, why is healthcare in every one of those countries 1/2 the cost that it is here? And why are we more 'bankrupt' than they are?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sibelian Donating Member (543 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
17. I work for the UK National Health Service.

Let us discuss your assertion, you and I.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #17
46. Just curious...
Does the NHS have deterrents built in to prevent unnecessary use/overuse of services?

Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sibelian Donating Member (543 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 04:50 AM
Response to Reply #46
54. ???

I don't understand the question? How can you overuse a hospital?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #54
85. Sorry.
Edited on Fri Nov-04-11 12:34 PM by moondust
I was thinking more along the lines of some people running to the doctor's office for every real or imagined hangnail, sore throat, stomach ache, etc. Hypochondriacs, Munchausen Syndrome, etc. Anything to prevent that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sgent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #85
89. I just don't see it
I've worked in physician offices where ppl had Medicaid or were dual eligible Medicare/Mediciaid (no co-pay's ever). Out of a 10,000 patient population, we maybe had 3 that were like that, and those 3 could come to the office every day and never incur enough expenses to be a drop in the bucket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sibelian Donating Member (543 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-11 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #85
103. These people exist but are VERY few in number.

Also, it only takes one of them to turn out one day to have a genuine illness to make dangerous. Munchhausen's are known by the system. It's doctors that decide on health care, not private companies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
19. it's not basic benefit to citizens that is bankrupting EU, rather the global financial cartels
just like here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mimosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. ^ True. ^ n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #6
24. Those other countries are not bankrupt because of social programs.
They have corrupt banksters just like us and they made the mistake of following raygun/booosh economics right over the cliff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems2002 Donating Member (337 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #6
27. If cheaper healthcare is bankrupting Europe, how is more expensive healthcare helping us???
It's not free, it's paid for by taxes. And it's ridiculous to suggest that healthcare is bankrupting other nations at the same time we're supposedly able to afford 2-10x the costs in America. If cheaper healthcare is hurting Europe, how the hell is more expensive healthcare benefiting our country.

AND, if you support business, why does the US burden its businesses, particularly the smaller companies who don't get sweetheart deals, with forcing them to provide insurance to their workers. Wouldn't it be better for business not to have to provide this benefit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DisgustipatedinCA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #6
30. I completely agree with you. Let's start turning the interstate system into gravel
The Interstate system is clearly not workable, since it's "free", i.e., paid for with our taxes. Thanks for setting me straight, O Visionary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
area51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
41. Have you ever stopped to notice ...
... that no other country is trying to switch to our style of health care system? It's because ours is inefficient, unworkable, and broken.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #41
70. +1000.
"The Greatest Health Care System In the World That, Curiously, No Other Country Wants to Emulate."

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
43. It worked out fine until the capitalists were deregulated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reggie the dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 04:36 AM
Response to Reply #6
53. no, the health care is not bankrupting the uk, or france
hell look at denmark, sweden, finland, they are not bankrupt, but they didnt lower taxes on the rich like the governments did in france, the uk, italy, greece. here in france the debt from our health care came about once they lowered the taxes on business owners for health care and didnt increase them on the workers, the fix for it is to raise taxes on business owners again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 07:17 AM
Response to Reply #6
58. I don't think that is correct. Please provide documentation to support your claim.
Countries are being bankrupted at this time because of greedy transnational banking practices. I don't think it has anything to do with health care.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
irislake Donating Member (967 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 08:08 AM
Response to Reply #6
63. BULLSHIT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bengalherder Donating Member (718 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #6
73. Old TE, grand as he was in WW1, was a bit of a fascist politically
You ain't foolin noone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomThom Donating Member (752 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #6
76. deleted
Edited on Fri Nov-04-11 11:05 AM by ThomThom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #6
80. An enormous lie.
Some of those countries have been sustaining single-payer universal health care, at half the total cost to GDP as that of health care costs in the United States and with a fraction of the costs going to "administration" (profit), for more than 80 years!

The financial troubles currently in Europe are thanks to the financial fraud and resulting meltdown of 2007-2009, and the fatal decision there to "bail out" the perpetrator institutions (i.e., allow plunder of the national treasuries and the use of central banks as piggy-banks by the private banks), instead of liquidating the TBTEs, prosecuting the criminal class, and starting public banks. European countries, like the USA, capitulated in allowing the banksters to socialize their losses. Private debt passed into public debt, so that now you can parrot the big lie that this is the fault of public spending rather than corporate fraud.

Oh, and welcome to DU, TE Lawrence!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txlibdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #80
99. +1, right on the money, so to speak
The criminal class got their bonuses (because they had a contract) but the union workers didn't get their wages and pensions, even though they also had a contract???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #6
91. Nonsense.
People do the same thing with corporate insurance. With universal coverage, small problems get stopped cheaply before they become big problems. The lack of prevention is what is bankrupting us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
93. Nonsense -- you're simply talking about the RW starving the system.. and whether starving education.
or starving medical care, it certainly doesn't stabilize or produce good

medicine or good education!!

It simply does the reverse -- !!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #6
94. ... and think we're all pretty clear on who has BAILED OUT whom ... !!!
Elites/corporatists make profits based on exploitation of nature, natural

resoruces, animal life and human labor -- !!

Without Congress/people affording them that privilege, they'd have no profits.

Congress has been corrupted by corporate/elite money and that has to end --

So does the many privileges which have provided those profits --

Exploitation of nature, natural resoruces and animal life ahs to be stopped --


Capitalism has only produced Global Warming and a loss of the planet -- and all nature!

Further, unregulated capitalism -- for which we have our corrupt Congress to thank --

is merely organized crime.


No -- I think the public is pretty clear on who the enemy is and what works and what

doesn't -- capitalism doesn't work -- democratic socialism and communities government

working for the people does!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donald Ian Rankin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
95. The problem is government-phobia.
In most of the rest of the first world, the debate is phrased in terms of government *services* - what should it provide, and how.

In the US, the debate is phrased in terms of government *control*; people are terrified of the idea of the government "controlling their health", even if it isn't.

For as long as "big government" remains a dirty word in the US, you're screwed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
7. The insurance industry has grown too big to fail...
or to change. They must maintain their monopoly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #7
25. Meanwhile, 38,000 people a year die from lack of insurance.
Edited on Thu Nov-03-11 02:50 PM by truedelphi
Over 700K Americans face medical related bankrupcy.

The only place where people are well right now is in Vermont!

And that happened because of Vermonters who are not beholden to either party, but vote Independent.

The Democratic Party is as guilty as anyone else for the failure of public option.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
area51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 02:35 AM
Response to Reply #25
52. Kicking thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shagbark Hickory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #7
37. Too big to regulate as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mimosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
9. Many companies would hire more people if they didn't have to provide health coverage
Edited on Thu Nov-03-11 02:18 PM by Mimosa
Companies would also not discriminate as much against hiring people over age 50 if they didn't have to provide health insurance benefits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 07:22 AM
Response to Reply #9
59. And they wouldn't ask employees about their bowel movements and sex life. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
12. A sad fact -
Edited on Thu Nov-03-11 01:27 PM by RC
"We could finance health care coverage for every American by taking the resources that employees and employers are pumping into the current broken system and still have money left over for a substantial tax cut, not to mention that it would put U.S. employers back on a level playing field with their competitors in the world market."


From the Constitution:

Section 8.
"The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts and excises, to pay the debts and PROVIDE FOR THE common defense and GENERAL WELFARE of the United States; but all duties, imposts and excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;..."

Twice in our Constitution it mentions "general welfare" What constitutes 'General Welfare'?
The old-age benefits provisions of the Social Security Act of 1935 is an example of providing for the 'general welfare'. Medicaid/Medicare are 2 more examples of providing for the 'general welfare'.

Government controlled, Single Payer, Universal health care for the people of the United States IS covered by the Constitution, because the relative health of our citizens does affect the general welfare of the Nation. 45,000 dead people a year are proof the profit driven, privately run systems we have in place now are not working to provide the necessary health care for our nation.
How can our present private health insurance system, with its many insurance companies (each with its own way of doing things), its own highly paid management, its own attention to the bottom line for its share holders, its own claims requirements, its own forms for submitting claims, etc., be more efficient than any government controlled single Payer system, with its single set of rules and forms?

How can we be the Greatest nation on earth,
if we can't/won't even take care of our own citizens?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #12
51. Really admire the way you juxtaposed the Constitution with the OP
And also Admire the citizens of Vermont who actually have Single Payer Universal Health Care.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
16. Get the fucken Republicants out of office.
All they do is block every attempt to solve our country's problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shagbark Hickory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #16
38. Can't just blame the retubbies for this one.
There were enough democrats to pass public option even but some of them were bribed to block it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #16
47. Because in many cases Democratic politicians enable the Republicans to "filibuster" in the Senate

Senator Reid and the Democratic majority have had three years to stop Republican procedural delay tactics (misnamed filibusters) and they have failed to.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bobbie Jo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 07:44 AM
Response to Reply #47
62. must. defend. republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #62
69. must.. convince.. DUers to not vote dem...
:rofl:

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dotymed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #69
77. I don't think it is an R or a D thing. I prefer D because they
did lead the fight for the 99% before the corporate takeover of America. I put people before party and honestly, although the majority of both parties seem to be corporate owned, the message of the people on the D side is much more people oriented. The actions, unfortunately, seem to result in the same legislation.

Single payer should have and,IMO, could have been passed if there were not corporate influence of our politicians. Maybe the first hurdle to getting single payer is removing all corporate money from politics. Elections should be publicly financed. This can be done by requiring the media to be good public citizens and give all candidates equal free air-time. Elections can be publicly financed without costing the tax payers extra money, since money seems to be the biggest excuse for not implementing this policy.

Still, the wealthy must pay their fair share of taxes. It is becoming more plain each day that capitalism is a barrier to freedom and humanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
28. That's a wonderfully ambiguous subject line, so it gets an automatic Rec!
I've found that I get very fatigued when I try to stare everyone in the face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
32. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
33. Has Peter O'Toole left the building?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sibelian Donating Member (543 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. T'would appear so for the time being

If we're discussing the same chap. He avoided me carefully, I've noticed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #36
42. Pity. He was here only so briefly...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
39. That is the ONE FACT that the Democratic Party "Leadership"...
...worked so very hard to prevent the American People from hearing during the "debates".

I'm ALL Fired Up!


You will know them by their WORKS,
not by their excuses.
Solidarity99!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
40. Imagine how cool it would be for a Democratic candidate to campaign on that pledge?
How cool would that be? He or she would win! Oh. ...Yoops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louslobbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
48. K&R n/t
Lou
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 07:14 AM
Response to Original message
56. wrong place
Edited on Fri Nov-04-11 07:23 AM by cui bono

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ozagnaria Donating Member (5 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
68. TN had a good system for a while
I lived in TN for a few years. When I moved there they had TNCARE, initially it was universal health care for everyone who did not have access to private health insurance, either it was not offered through work, or they couldn't afford it if it was or if they were just unemployed. If you were employed it was offered on a sliding scale. Similar to Taiwan's system. Well over the years it has gotten worse and reduced and changed, I think now it is 10 visits and covers care if you have major problems (cancer etc) to a point. The biggest problem with it was mismanagement and fraud. These two issues were the biggest problems that cause funding short falls and caused the system to change.

Honestly I don't see why we can't have both systems (public and private- they way it was in TN) in place. Their initial model should have been looked at and refined, if people were looking for a national model, instead of what we got.
I thought it was a brilliant system.

Side note, In TN just to give TN some props: when I moved there in the late 1990's the min wage in TN was 7.25 an hour unemployment was alway under or around 4% -even until the 2009's, they have no state income tax, no property tax on cars, no property tax in the county I lived in on the 1st 70K of your house, the sales tax was 9%, but not on food or clothes, the state government is a pay go system and does not deal in credit for their funding, single, married, gay, straight, could foster and adopt children -side note when I left our kinship foster care placement in my county was over 70% - so these children removed from their parents were placed with relatives or family friends- it was a neat weird place- hopefully it still is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DLine Donating Member (167 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
72. But TORT reform will fix EVERYTHING
Stop letting those greedy Liberal lawyers sue doctors and that will fix all of our skyrocketing healthcare costs.

-Tommy McTeabagger


:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tcaudilllg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
74. Actually, it's all a distraction
We do need single payer care, I agree, but part of the solution is also more medical schools and more doctors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
78. How do we get a Congress that will vote for it? The 1% own not only the Congress
but the secret software electronic voting machines that get their whores elected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #78
81. Multi-step process. First step is over turning Citizen's United.
There are a lot more steps after that though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #81
83. So the SCOTUS owned by the 1% will overturn Citizens United? I want to see that work but I'm not
holding my breath. Then again, I'm not the sharpest knife in the drawer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #83
97. SCOTUS won't touch it. It will take other means.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #97
100. But if Citizens United is overturned, SCOTUS will turn it back. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-11 05:05 AM
Response to Reply #100
102. Not if it is with a Constitutional Amendment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aggiesal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
82. Without reading everyone's input ...
When I come across an anti-Single Payer advocate, I shoot
down every one if their arguments.

It costs too much - Compared to the price we're currently paying for personal health insurance, we could pay
1/3 into a national plan, and get better coverage with money left over.

We pay for the undocumented alien - As compared to currently paying for the uninsured we come out way ahead.

The wait to see a doctor is too long - Really? Have you tried getting an appointment under your current system?
I takes 3-6 months before I'm able to get an appointment with my primary care physician. What's the difference?

It's socialized medicine - Really? Do you know what socialism is, or you just a parrot for the RW talking heads?

blah, blah ,blah.

It time to get single-payer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigD_95 Donating Member (728 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
84. there is too much money
to lie to people to let the "Simple" happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ozagnaria Donating Member (5 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
87. cost?
I wonder, and I am going to try and see what I can find out, but I really wonder what the percentages are for the amount money being spent on health care in this country is. Like , how much of all the moneys in the entire industry is spent on advertising and marketing to doctors etc, (penicillin was a great drug but I don't remember seeing commercials for it when I was a kid and my obgyn has free lunch every day for employees at her office provided by drug reps), lobbying the government and various politicians, employee costs - salaries, benefits etc, administration- paperwork, lawsuits and so on versus direct care costs for the patient. I would also like to know how much money is coming out of individual pockets, tax revenues and companies pockets.

I think there is a lot on mis-information, bad information and incomplete information out there. It is like arguing about what something is when half of it is hidden in a box.

Honestly whats the big frigg'n deal about getting the real numbers, sitting down and starting from scratch to make something that works for everyone? yeah, greed, personal power, blah blah blah, I really am over it all, most people are....for how many years I can't even count the people I have known who walked around talking universal health care R and D's - but the people on the streets are nothing like the people in office) and how they pay taxes into a system but can't use it...well....then...here we go and now....what happens ...big ol hot mess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
90. That's a necessary part of the solution.
Another necessary part is controlling disease.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
92. Think Americans have no problem understanding that -- it's politicians ignoring will of the people !
Edited on Fri Nov-04-11 01:15 PM by defendandprotect
Also have to say that this deterioration in health care isn't only based on

lack of affordability -- for either the care or the insurance -- it's also a

deterioration in the medical training and the doctors it's produced!!



GP's and Dentists -- tough to find a decent one --

GP's were turned into "pill poppers" long ago but Big Pharma has really taken them

over now!


And yet despite the fact that we're about the sickest nation on the planet, Americans

somehow continue to think that we have good health care -- ???? YIKES!!!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
101. I'd like to see a Constitutional amendment
making healthcare a right, not a privilege. It's as essential to the life of the citizenry as military protection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC