Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bill Maher is often a weak-minded light weight.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Admiral Loinpresser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 01:27 PM
Original message
Bill Maher is often a weak-minded light weight.
For example, Maher had Grover Norquist on his show last Friday and said something so stupid that it made my head hurt. He said Ronald Reagan was an “old school” Republican. The context was that Reagan had agreed to six or seven tax hikes during his two terms.

The idea that Reagan was “old school” in his approach to taxes is laughable. He was revolutionary (or more aptly “reactionary) in his approach to taxes. He caused radical decreases in the largest marginal income tax rates, from 70% to 28%. When his ideologically ridiculous “trickle down” policies led to the opposite effect on the federal deficit from the predictions he made, he was forced to compromise with a Democratic Congress. Hence the modest tax increases after his original hugely regressive initiative upon taking power.

Bill Maher, either get smart or surrender your show to someone with a sense of history and greater capacity for critical thinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. And everyone always forgets it was Reagan who taxed *unemployment benefits*
Which, it should be noted, no Democrat, subsequently, seems willing to make an issue of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laluchacontinua Donating Member (277 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. And social security benefits, for the first time in the history of the program.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarLeftFist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. When Reagan said "The Govt is the problem" is the day democracy was undermined and died.
STUPIDEST thing a sitting President has ever said. But I think Maher got to Norquist, Norquist was squirming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. Compared to today's repubs, he's exactly right
I guess it depends on how one uses "old school".

I found the interview to be a lot of fun, because he made Grover so uncomfortable :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarLeftFist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Yeah he did. We can't expect Maher to completely berate his guests.
He wants them to come back so he can continue chipping away at their ideology.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Admiral Loinpresser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #6
25. I wouldn't encourage him to berate guests.
But I do encourage him not to mischaracterize an ideologue who set this country on a tragic course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarLeftFist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. I think it was his way of saying "look how batshit crazy you have all become"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
31. I think we all knew Maher meant that Regan wasn't as batshit crazy
as the current teabaggers policywise. Though he was batshit crazy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellisonz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. Voodoo economics.
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XanaDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. I've heard Maher referred to as an "intellectual"
He's not but he is fairly well read. when he's spot on he can be inspired. Not sure where he got that a out Ronnie. Sarcasm, I hope?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Worship Money Donating Member (257 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Right
Edited on Thu Nov-03-11 01:39 PM by Worship Money
Maher IS a bit of an intellectual lightweight, but that's relative and he usually (usually) doesn't pretend otherwise. The other thing is, I don't think he's all that funny.

However, he is spot on and quite well spoken on a number of really important issues. Like...THE MOST important issues. He's surprisingly charismatic and brings up excellent points.

I definitely consider Maher as on our side, with secondary disagreements coming up as you'd expect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Admiral Loinpresser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
17. He seemed quite sincere.
My point is that when so many give any credence to Reagan, it pollutes the public discourse. The majority of Americans never agreed with Reagan's radical policies. But he always polled better on his likability ratings than policy. With the hagiographic treatment by Fox News and others, historical revisionism on Reagan is in full swing.

Most people believe whatever they hear, if it is repeated often enough. So-called progressives participating in the revisionism is a big part of the problem. Hence the cognitive dissonance: a supermajority of Americans want a sea change away from Reaganism but few are willing to go TV and tell the truth about the connection between the Reagan Revolution and the resultant Occupy movement!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 01:52 AM
Response to Reply #17
32. My problems with Maher started this year when he would come
on stage with this plate of food. It was his way of having a "pie chart" that was supposed to graphically portray how the Federal Government's general fund pays for things.

And he, for whatever reason, insisted on having the Social Security monies that get paid out, come from the General Fund. By lumping Social Security with Medicare, he is showing everyone that one third of our yearly budget is spent on those items.

It is very graphic, and it does make a point - but it is totally wrong. Social Security has its own fund. That fund has a 2.1 trillion dollar surplus. Why no one has corrected him on this I don't know.

But he thinks his "pie chart" is the most clever thing in the world.

He has dragged it out at least three times already this season.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jello Biafra Donating Member (222 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
8. What you expect from Maher....?
he's a comedian...and as such I wouldn't expect him to have a sense of history. Herman Cain, on the other hand, thinks China doesn't have nuclear weapons yet. But as a presidential candidate, I would expect Cain to know more about history to be qualified. It seems none of the GOP candidates are qualified since they don't know about history and they don't read. Wow have we down dumbed the position...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
9. Like any libertarian, he prefers simple solutions to complex problems.
Like any comedian, he prefers a joke to the truth - even if the joke might relies biases which are false.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
10. Obama called Regan 'transformative' and more so than Clinton
And Maher is a comic. Discuss. His show exists to entertain, not to present the greatest capacity for critical thinking. The point is laughs. That's the objective.
Grover was highly uncomfortable. That was entertaining, and I laughed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
11. Yeah, he is a mixed bag. He is no Rachel Maddow or Thom Hartmann, but...
....he does seem to be on the correct side of a lot of issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Admiral Loinpresser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #11
28. Agreed.
I agree with him much more often than not. But sometimes I think it's unsettling when comedians take themselves seriously. Of Maher, Jon Stewart and Colbert, I think Stephen Colbert is the only one with sufficient gravitas to be spot on almost every time. In general, I think they all do some very good things. But Mr. Maher, don't just rely on staff research, please talk to a real thinker before interviewing someone with great influence, such as Norquist!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
12. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Admiral Loinpresser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #12
22. What is "lazy and reprehensible"
is Bill Maher who did indeed say Reagan was an "old school" Republican at the eight minute mark of the linked video in the way I suggested in the OP. Reagan did *not* believe that raising taxes was necessary in order to avoid deficits, as Maher asserts. He campaigned and governed on precisely the opposite premise. To suggest that Reagan was an old school Republican is a perversion of history. So what is your point?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
13. Maher is an entertainer...first, foremost, and always
This should surprise no one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laluchacontinua Donating Member (277 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
14. Bill Maher is a mediocre thinker who imagines he's brilliant. I've always disliked him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
16. Maher's really great talent is the perfectly-worded smackdown
When he aims it in the proper direction it's a lot of fun to witness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
18. Reagan was President over 20 years ago. And he was a lot more cooperative minded than today's breed.
That all Bill is saying. He isn't trying to let Reagan off the hook for anything. What he said is factually accurate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libinnyandia Donating Member (526 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
19. Maher doesn't pretend to be deep thinker and
I enjoy much more listening to him than Dennis Miller or Michael Moore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
20. That Wasn't Maher's Point
You missed the point completely. He was undermining Norquist by reminding him that even St. Ronnie saw that sometimes one can't stay locked into the "low taxes" mindset.

The right thinks all Reagan did was lower taxes and save the economy. Maher was reminding the loathesome Norquist, on international TV, that he was wrong.

The point was to make Norquist look like the radical dimwit he is.
GAC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Admiral Loinpresser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. Actually, I believe you missed mine.
I noted in the OP that Maher was making the point that Reagan raised taxes many times. A legitmate point which made Norquist uncomfortable. But indoing so he referred to Reagan in a way which is highly misleading on his position on taxes: "old school." My broader point here is that to submit to the premise that Reagan is laudable in some way in this regard is not historically accurate. If Maher had not tried to paint Reagan in a false light I would not have had a problem. Many parts of the interview were good. But continuing this slavish deference to Reagan as someone of substance is pollutive of the public discourse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snooper2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. you forgot to put a space between "in" and "doing"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Admiral Loinpresser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. LOL, I stand corrected. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
21. Mahrer handed Grover his lunch in a bathtub...
He beat up Grover with his own words and analogies. I thought he turned the Raygun myths and bullshit that Grover and his ilk perpetrate on him...and made him look like the hypocrite and fool that he his. He may not have used the framing you like but he did it with Grover's own words...hanging him on his own petard.

There are many times that I would agree that Mahrer is a lightweight or lets his prejudices get in the way of being as objective and educated on a topic as I would like, but in this case, much to my surprise and delight disected Grover using his own talking points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jayfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
23. Aren't we all? -NT-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
30. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC