Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ralph Nader live in Freedom Plaza, DC: Thursday 5:15pm eastern

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
jtrockville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 04:17 PM
Original message
Ralph Nader live in Freedom Plaza, DC: Thursday 5:15pm eastern
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Zoeisright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. FU, Nader.
That asshole is just one of the reasons we're in this mess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
the other one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. -1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. Amen to that.
Nader going to OWS is like Henry Dawes touring a Native American settlement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libinnyandia Donating Member (526 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. Nader and his negative legacy
You may find this hard to take, but I agree with you about Mr. Nader's role in what has happened to this country. I posted yesterday what you consider the worst posting this year. I do not take anything personally what I see posted on DU and I am glad you and I agree on something. Mr. Nader will not be one of the leaders who will lead us out of this mess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #15
23. Too bad for the naysayers but Nader was invited to speak by the October2011 occupation.
He's been a participant and a speaker a couple of times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trueblue2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #15
36. nader stinks. IT IS BECAUSE OF HIM THAT BUSH BECAME PRESIDENT
SHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAME on you nader
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #36
40. Right. The Supreme Court, George W. Bush and Joe Leiberman had nothing to do with it.

Talk about a whitewash!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #40
45. Without Nader, there would have been no court challenge.
That's one thing the Nader defense team can't spin away no matter how they want to shift the blame. All other things aside, without Nader in the picture, Gore would have won Florida, and Bush would have been back in Texas before Thanksgiving.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. Oh Jesus H. Christ. When will he just f disappear? He can't miss a free publicity moment, can he?
The man is an idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. begging for attention again it seems


I wonder if he ever found someone to mount a primary challenge to our current President





Oh, wait.... no I don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libinnyandia Donating Member (526 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
5. So Sad.
I wish we had other people to spread the messages that need to be sent to the 99ers out there to get them to understand what need to be done. So many people are turned off by people like him and Michaelel Moore. They may still have some good ideas but aren't the right messengers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
6. We don't need a demagogue, just regular people there, and there are
millions of us who can speak out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
7. Long past his relevance.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #7
30. Apparently OWS disagrees with that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #30
35. You have a link to that poll yet? Your memory tends to be very selective.
So forgive me if I don't take your word for the time of day, let alone anything else. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenfrequed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #35
51. Polls equal relevence then eh?
I suppose his decades of activism for justice, public safety, consumer protection, corporate transparency, and political access by the people are irrelevent then.

Nice view of history you got there.

Ralph has been right on all of the issues nearly a hundred percent of the time. But I suppose OWS should have invited Evan Bayh to speak to them instead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
8. I hope they pie the motherfucker.
His shilling for Bush gave us this last fucking decade of deregulation and tax cuts for the ultrawealthy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #8
31. They invited him, so I doubt that is going to happen. Clearly
that small contingency of 'nader blamers' is not among the OWS movement, which is a good thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
10. If Nader wasn't essentially correct we wouldn't be seeing OWS or anything like it..
OWS is a reaction to the fact that the political establishment in general has sold out to the 1%.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #10
25. Exactly. History has proven Nader right on just about everything.
Gore lost his own home state. People need to quit blaming Nader for the fact that Gore ran a shitty campaign on a shitty platform. When you run as a right-center Democrat, don't get pissed off when the left stays home or votes for someone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #10
28. Nader and the Hippies were right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
11. real windy in that park this time of year
Edited on Thu Nov-03-11 04:41 PM by bigtree
without a crowd
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtrockville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. How can you tell? The camera is pointed at the speaker, not the crowd.
There are typically ~50-75 people occupying Freedom Plaza. But more than 1500 nurses (plus some folks from the AFL-CIO) were there today for the Financial Transaction Tax march.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
the other one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
13. Calling for MONEY OUT of Elecctions. What an asshole.
Kill the messenger!!!



:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. He was right. And most people know it, which is why he
is there.

Rec'd to zero.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. How about killing the messenger for being a lying sack of shit?
A shill who says something accurate doesn't suddenly become gospel. He's still a shill who's singlehandedly responsible for the overwhelming majority of what's gone wrong the last ten years--everything you can trace to the Bush administration, in fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. The criminals on the SC, the Citizen's United money that
helped turn the tide on Clarence Thomas and put him on the SC in time to swing an election, are responsible for the beginning of what led to the situation we are now in.

The Democrats who voted for Bush didn't help either.

Ralph Nader was right. He is still right, and all the efforts to place the blame on him by what is now a very small minority of the population since the public is more awake now than it has ever been, simply look silly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #19
26. And 11 Democrats voted to confirm Clarence Thomas's nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. Which shows Nader was right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SomethingFishy Donating Member (552 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. Ralph Nader is responsible for the overwhelming majority
of what went wrong in the last ten years?

You need to get out more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #24
39. People forget that there was a huge part of the population that was devasted by Welfare Reform
and NAFTA and the expansion of the prison industrial complex. For advocates of the working class and the poor, these were not small issues. When welfare reform passed, I had to call in sick to work for 3 days because I couldn't stop ranting and crying. I worked as a welfare recipient activist for over a decade... these women were already pushed around and slapped around regularly by a system set up more as a deterrence than a safety net. To see that further eroded was too much for this bleeding heart liberal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenfrequed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #17
52. Who is he a shill for?
Really? Do you even know what the word 'shill' means?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
18. Recced with deep admiration for Mr. Nader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OilemFirchen Donating Member (535 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
20. There's a rumor that someone brought doughnuts
If you see him disappear mid-sentence, don't panic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #20
34. And the fact is the rumors are false. He was invited.
Because he is known to have been correct about everything he has said about our Political system. Now a majority of the people agree with him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
21. This should go well. Popcorn, anyone??
:popcorn:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Yes, please enjoy the intellectual criticism of Ralph Nader.
By Gosh! DUers ARE the most intelligent people on the internet!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
27. Just ignore him..maybe he will go away?
Like you did in 2000?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistler162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
32. Show me the EKG!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistler162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
33. Show me the EKG!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
37. Fuck Ralph Nader...
Edited on Thu Nov-03-11 09:05 PM by SidDithers
Oh, and:



Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
38. Howard Zinn voted for him in 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
white_wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #38
41. Zinn's endorsement is worth more than all of DU's hate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #41
43. He originally said he was going to vote for Obama but then changed his mind.
Edited on Thu Nov-03-11 09:29 PM by Luminous Animal
Here is his ringing support for Nader (and also the piece where he endorses Obama).

http://www.progressive.org/mag/zinn1008.html


I have no doubt that by far the wisest, most reliable, with the most integrity, of all recent Presidential candidates is Ralph Nader. But I think it is a waste of his political strength, a puny act, to expend it in the electoral arena, where the result can show only weakness. His power, his intelligence, lies in the mobilization of people outside the ballot box.

So, yes, I will vote for Obama, because the corrupt political system offers me no choice, but only for the moment I pull down the lever in the voting booth.



Emphasis mine, natch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Autumn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
42. Ralph Nader was right
K%R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
44. Bill Moyers doesn't share the opinion
Edited on Thu Nov-03-11 10:28 PM by Blue_In_AK
of some here at DU regarding Mr. Nader. This is long, but well worth reading. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bill-moyers/occupy-wall-street_b_1071288.html?ref=yahoo&ir=Yahoo



Journalist Bill Moyers was the keynote speaker at the 40th anniversary celebration of Ralph Nader's Public Citizen. In his speech, Moyers discusses the Occupy Wall Street movement and chronicles the history of America's middle class.



I am honored to share this occasion with you. No one beyond your collegial inner circle appreciates more than I do what you have stood for over these 40 years, or is more aware of the battles you have fought, the victories you have won, and the passion for democracy that still courses through your veins. The great progressive of a century ago, Robert LaFollette of Wisconsin - a Republican, by the way - believed that "Democracy is a life; and involves constant struggle." Democracy has been your life for four decades now, and would have been even more imperiled today if you had not stayed the course.


I began my public journalism the same year you began your public advocacy, in 1971. Our paths often paralleled and sometimes crossed. Over these 40 years journalism for me has been a continuing course in adult education, and I came early on to consider the work you do as part of the curriculum - an open seminar on how government works - and for whom. Your muckraking investigations - into money and politics, corporate behavior, lobbying, regulatory oversight, public health and safety, openness in government, and consumer protection, among others - are models of accuracy and integrity. They drive home to journalists that while it is important to cover the news, it is more important to uncover the news. As one of my mentors said, "News is what people want to keep hidden; everything else is publicity." And when a student asked the journalist and historian Richard Reeves for his definition of " real news", he answered: "The news you and I need to keep our freedoms." You keep reminding us how crucial that news is to democracy. And when the watchdogs of the press have fallen silent, your vigilant growls have told us something's up.


So I'm here as both citizen and journalist to thank you for all you have done, to salute you for keeping the faith, and to implore you to fight on during the crisis of hope that now grips our country. The great American experience in creating a different future together - this "voluntary union for the common good" - has been flummoxed by a growing sense of political impotence - what the historian Lawrence Goodwyn has described as a mass resignation of people who believe "the dogma of democracy" on a superficial public level but who no longer believe it privately. There has been, he says, a decline in what people think they have a political right to aspire to - a decline of individual self-respect on the part of millions of Americans.

<snip>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libinnyandia Donating Member (526 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #44
47. Nader and Public Citizen
The last time I received a mailing from Public Citizen, didnt see nay reference to Mr. Nader on the letter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #47
48. I don't think Nader has been involved officially with the group since the 80's
he started it but not part of the day to day anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libinnyandia Donating Member (526 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #48
50. Nader founded it,
but being associated with Nader is negative now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnyxCollie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
46. Correction to a post I made on a different thread.
George Soros : Tea Baggers : : Jane Hamsher Ralph Nader : Obama's most ardent supporters
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
49. I wonder how much money the GOP will pay him this time around?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
53. Fuck you, Ralphie.
People like Nader are part of the problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC