Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Multiple missteps led to drone killing U.S. troops in Afghanistan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-11 09:02 PM
Original message
Multiple missteps led to drone killing U.S. troops in Afghanistan
By David S. Cloud and David Zucchino, Los Angeles Times
November 5, 2011, 3:50 p.m.
Reporting from Washington— On the evening of April 5, a pilot settled into a leather captain's chair at Creech Air Force Base in southern Nevada and took the controls of a Predator drone flying over one of the most violent areas of southwestern Afghanistan. Minutes later, his radio crackled.

A firefight had broken out. Taliban insurgents had ambushed about two dozen Marines patrolling a bitterly contested road.

The Air Force captain angled his joystick and the drone veered toward the fighting taking place half a world away, where it was already morning. He powered up two Hellfire missiles under its wings and ordered a crew member responsible for operating the drone's cameras to search for enemy fighters.

It didn't take long to find something. Three figures, fuzzy blobs on the pilot's small black-and-white screen, lay in a poppy field a couple of hundred yards from the road.


more

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-drone-attack-20111106,0,549676.story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Aerows Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-11 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. I feel so much "safer"
Knowing that these drones will soon be deployed around the United States.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phasma ex machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-11 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. This photo and caption appear on the left sidebar of the story:
Edited on Sat Nov-05-11 09:23 PM by phasma ex machina


Homeland Security adding 3 drone aircraft despite lack of pilots.


Autopilots? Keep a sharp eye 99 percenters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-11 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. friendly fire is an American specialty.
Like the joke says, "When the French shoot, the Germans duck. When the Germans shoot, the French duck. When the Americans shoot, everybody ducks."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sad sally Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-11 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. The last sentence says there was a chaplin waiting for the pilot.
What about all the innocent people killed by unmanned predator drones - piloted by Americans. Do those pilots have any remorse or need a chaplin after they kill innocent people? The US' use of these unmanned weapons has opened a moral issue that isn't going away.
#####

The expansion of the CIA’s undeclared drone war in the tribal areas of Pakistan required a big expansion of who can be marked for death. Once the standard for targeted killing was top-level leadership in al-Qaeda or one of its allies. That’s long gone, especially as the number of people targeted at once has grown.

This is the new standard, according to a blockbuster piece in the Wall Street Journal: “men believed to be militants associated with terrorist groups, but whose identities aren’t always known.” The CIA is now killing people without knowing who they are, on suspicion of association with terrorist groups. The article does not define the standards are for “suspicion” and “association.”

Strikes targeting those people — usually “groups” of such people — are called “signature” strikes. “The bulk of CIA’s drone strikes are signature strikes,” the Journal’s Adam Entous, Siobhan Gorman and Julian E. Barnes report.

And bulk really means bulk. The Journal reports that the growth in clusters of people targeted by the CIA has required the agency to tell its Pakistani counterparts about mass attacks. When the agency expects to kill 20 or more people at once, then it’s got to give the Pakistanis notice.
---
Fundamentally, though, it’s a question of policy: whether it’s acceptable for the CIA to kill someone without truly knowing if he’s the bombsmith or the laundry guy.

The Journal reports that the CIA’s willingness to strike without such knowledge — sanctioned, in full, by President Barack Obama — is causing problems for the State Department and the military.

http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2011/11/cia-drones-marked-for-death/?du
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-11 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
5. A little lengthy but still worth the read for the detailed account. nt
PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-11 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. maybe the white house needs a trophy room of some sort nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-11 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
7. people do die in video games
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-11 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
8. Where did the LAT get this story?
I thought that there were military censors widely embedded in the media keeping us safe from knowing about this kind of stuff. We are pretending to be at war, state of emergency declared yearly, after all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC