Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

GOP lawmaker: I didn’t agree to marry Grover Norquist forever

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-11 03:28 PM
Original message
GOP lawmaker: I didn’t agree to marry Grover Norquist forever
“Will you support more revenues?” Fox News host Mike Wallace asked Simpson Sunday. “Either from raising tax rates or cutting deductions as a part of the plan to cut the deficit?”

“You have to,” Simpson declared. “The reality is you can’t get to $4 trillion without including additional revenue. We might have different ideas about what those revenues will look like. I think you could get additional revenues by actually lowering the tax rates and eliminating all of the exemptions underneath and that type of thing. And I think you’d have an economic boom in this country and the revenue would come in to the federal government. So, more revenue is key to this.”

“Grover Norquist, a name with which I’m sure you’re familiar, the head of Americans for Tax Reform, has a pledge that you and all but six House Republicans have signed to oppose any net increases in taxes — exactly the opposite of what you just said to me,” Wallace noted. “How many House Republicans do you think will follow you, are willing to break their pledge and, quite frankly, put their political futures at risk to make this deal?”

“I signed that in 1998 when I first ran,” Simpson recalled. “I didn’t know I was signing a marriage agreement that would last forever and I think the majority of members of Congress that you have to have additional revenue.”

MORE:
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/11/06/gop-lawmaker-i-didnt-agree-to-marry-grover-norquist-forever/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-11 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. This also ties into the bipartisan letter signed a few days ago by both D's and R's:
http://www.businessweek.com/news/2011-11-04/forty-house-republicans-back-revenue-increase-to-cut-deficit.html">Forty House Republicans Back Revenue Increase to Cut Deficit

60 D's and 40 R's signed it. The letter itself, as worded, is unfortunately ambiguous- and probably intentionally so. Still, it is some kind of a weird start, I guess.

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis-t Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-11 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. I can't wait to see Norquist wet himself when
repugs eventually resign themselves to real facts. Their is a crack in their armor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ship of Fools Donating Member (899 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-11 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. "...and, quite frankly, put their political futures at risk to make this deal?”
And that, dear Mr. Wallace, is precisely the problem. Clueless, faux journalist that you are -- will you EVER GET IT?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulliver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-11 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. GOP fingers glued to the doorjamb on this one.
Thanks, Grover!

But you watch. The GOP rank and file will forgive breaking the pledge. The Tea Party is shutting up, Sarah Palin is out of the news, and Mitt Romney is headed for their nomination. Principles be damned. Anything to win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC