Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

City covertly removes controversial park bench

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-11 09:47 AM
Original message
City covertly removes controversial park bench
City covertly removes controversial park bench

PRESCOTT - Prescott College student Kristin Anthony knew things were not going well in her negotiations with the City of Prescott over the bench she created in Granite Creek Park.

Still, she said she never expected the scene she found when she arrived at the downtown-area park on Tuesday morning.

"I was the first one here, and I saw that the bench was gone," Anthony said, standing near the bare area where the bench once stood. "I thought I was dreaming."

The community's park bench saga ended abruptly sometime Monday night/Tuesday morning, when City of Prescott crews removed the bench that had been the source of controversy in the community for the better part of the past month



http://www.dcourier.com/main.asp?SectionID=1&subsectionID=1086&articleID=99363

Letter: City wrong to destroy participatory bench project

EDITOR:

As president of Prescott College, I am stunned by actions of the City in removing Kristin Anthony's bench in the middle of the night.

Kristin designed the bench with all good intentions as a community gathering place, and she asked community members to participate in its creation. She and others who supported the project agreed to alter the design to meet the City's questions about safety, although the original dissatisfaction apparently was about the symbols on many of the bench's tiles. I followed the dialogue between the City and Kristin, and was hopeful that both "sides" were learning from the negotiations and that a win/win situation would result.

Instead, the City acted foolishly in destroying the bench, doing so without notice and under cover of darkness. What does this action teach students? How can we be proud to live in and partner with a City such as this?

Kristin R. Woolever, Ph.D.

President, Prescott College

http://www.dcourier.com/main.asp?SectionID=36&SubsectionID=73&ArticleID=99814

Public officials would tell a curious public only that the incomplete brief statement sent Tuesday would be their final word on the subject. The city has already told its residents what kind of art can and can't be displayed, and now our public officials are telling residents what they should and should not have answers to.

Accountability and transparency are long gone from the City of Prescott. Enough so that the bizarre chain of events led one city councilperson, Lora Lopas, to abruptly resign her seat. "I firmly believe in this, and for a city to go in the middle of the night (last night) and remove a piece of public art when I was last informed there was a solution to replace certain tiles and keep the bench, that just frankly disgusts me," Lopas wrote in her letter of resignation.

We'll never know exactly what original proposals and/or changes the artist, Kristin Anthony, submitted for approval to the city, since officials have decided what they've said is enough.

If Anthony did veer from her approved submission without proper notice, that serves neither support for public art nor the artist herself. And if the city had a deficient policy in place for public art, then that, too, is cause enough for the mess in which the city now finds itself.

http://www.dcourier.com/main.asp?SectionID=36&subsectionID=1118&articleID=99383
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-11 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. Sheesh. Governments act STOOPID. Is this another of their anti-loitering laws at work? nt
Edited on Mon Nov-07-11 09:49 AM by Sarah Ibarruri
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-11 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
2. The city's press release sounded better in the original German. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-11 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. LOL! (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-11 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
4. Looks like a cake
Maybe somebody ate it. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-11 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Aliens eat Buicks so maybe they eat cake like benches too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-11 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. lol
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarCenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-11 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
7. Wouldn't that bench design be pretty bad for the tree that it is around?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-11 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. Assuming that it is, as it appears, solid concrete, yeah, it will kill the tree.
Between the weight pressing down on the roots, and the roots being covered, not able to get water other than the small hole at the center, the tree would not prosper.

Maybe, if the bench was just taken away and not destroyed, they can re-purpose it with a fountain in the middle. That would be cool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-11 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. It's fugly too.
Edited on Mon Nov-07-11 11:59 AM by LeftyMom
If somebody stuck an eyesore like that in the middle of a park near my house, I'd be really irritated. Both at the unwanted ugly thing in a public space, and the public expense involved in removing it.

There are reasons there's a procedure to get permission for installing stuff like that. Plenty of people get permission (and guidance about what's going to look good, not cause damage, meet safety standards, etc) and then install useful and attractive objects in public spaces. Circumventing those procedures results in wasting time and money on things that have to be removed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-11 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
8. Brought to you by the same racist morons who wanted to "lighten" the faces on a school mural...

On his May 21 show, for instance, Blair said, "I am not a racist individual, but I will tell you depicting a black guy in the middle of that mural, based upon who's president of the United States today and based upon the history of this community when I grew up, we had four black families - who I have been very good friends with for years - to depict the biggest picture on that building as a black person, I would have to ask the question, 'Why?'"

http://dcourier.com/main.asp?SectionID=1&SubSectionID=1086&ArticleID=81753


:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-11 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
9. Looks to me like they censored the artwork...big time.
Edited on Mon Nov-07-11 10:43 AM by shraby
Artwork is form of speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-11 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
10. In other news the city will allow the yellow flag to fly............
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intheflow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-11 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
12. Horribly written articles and letter.
"Controversial symbols" = what exactly? I can see a Star of David, but that's hardly controversial. Unless your town is openly anti-Semitic.

Not defending the town's actions at all, but criticizing the reporting big time. :thumbsdown:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-11 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Yeah, it's not quite clear.
The newspaper is not saying what the crux of the issue is, it just talks about symbols (what symbols) and apparently there is some conflict over the use of materials, specifically tiles, with respect to its durability, as well as some complaints that the artist's work diverged from the plans she had shown the city. I'm not even sure disputes over fulfilling the plan, materials, and maintenance should be considered the same issue as censorship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-11 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. My guess: It looked "Mexican"
That's what my older wild west white cowboy relatives would say.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-11 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
14. When all problems look like a nail...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC