Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fahrenheit 11-11-11

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
davidswanson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-11 07:52 AM
Original message
Fahrenheit 11-11-11
Believe it or not, November 11th was not made a holiday in order to celebrate war, support troops, or cheer the 11th year of occupying Afghanistan. This day was made a holiday in order to celebrate an armistice that ended what was up until that point, in 1918, one of the worst things our species had thus far done to itself, namely World War I.

World War I, then known simply as the world war or the great war, had been marketed as a war to end war. Celebrating its end was also understood as celebrating the end of all wars. A ten-year campaign was launched in 1918 that in 1928 created the Kellogg-Briand Pact, legally banning all wars. That treaty is still on the books, which is why war making is a criminal act and how Nazis came to be prosecuted for it.

"n November 11, 1918, there ended the most unnecessary, the most financially exhausting, and the most terribly fatal of all the wars that the world has ever known. Twenty millions of men and women, in that war, were killed outright, or died later from wounds. The Spanish influenza, admittedly caused by the War and nothing else, killed, in various lands, one hundred million persons more." -- Thomas Hall Shastid, 1927.

According to U.S. Socialist Victor Berger, all the United States had gained from participation in World War I was the flu and prohibition. It was not an uncommon view. Millions of Americans who had supported World War I came, during the years following its completion on November 11, 1918, to reject the idea that anything could ever be gained through warfare.

Sherwood Eddy, who coauthored "The Abolition of War" in 1924, wrote that he had been an early and enthusiastic supporter of U.S. entry into World War I and had abhorred pacifism. He had viewed the war as a religious crusade and had been reassured by the fact that the United States entered the war on a Good Friday. At the war front, as the battles raged, Eddy writes, "we told the soldiers that if they would win we would give them a new world."

Eddy seems, in a typical manner, to have come to believe his own propaganda and to have resolved to make good on the promise. "But I can remember," he writes, "that even during the war I began to be troubled by grave doubts and misgivings of conscience." It took him 10 years to arrive at the position of complete Outlawry, that is to say, of wanting to legally outlaw all war. By 1924 Eddy believed that the campaign for Outlawry amounted, for him, to a noble and glorious cause worthy of sacrifice, or what U.S. philosopher William James had called "the moral equivalent of war." Eddy now argued that war was "unchristian." Many came to share that view who a decade earlier had believed Christianity required war. A major factor in this shift was direct experience with the hell of modern warfare, an experience captured for us by the British poet Wilfred Owen in these famous lines:

If in some smothering dreams you too could pace

Behind the wagon that we flung him in,

And watch the white eyes writhing in his face,

His hanging face, like a devil's sick of sin;

If you could hear, at every jolt, the blood

Come gargling from the froth-corrupted lungs,

Obscene as cancer, bitter as the cud

Of vile, incurable sores on innocent tongues,

My friend, you would not tell with such high zest

To children ardent for some desperate glory,

The old Lie; Dulce et Decorum est

Pro patria mori.

The propaganda machinery invented by President Woodrow Wilson and his Committee on Public Information had drawn Americans into the war with exaggerated and fictional tales of German atrocities in Belgium, posters depicting Jesus Christ in khaki sighting down a gun barrel, and promises of selfless devotion to making the world safe for democracy. The extent of the casualties was hidden from the public as much as possible during the course of the war, but by the time it was over many had learned something of war's reality. And many had come to resent the manipulation of noble emotions that had pulled an independent nation into overseas barbarity.

However, the propaganda that motivated the fighting was not immediately erased from people's minds. A war to end wars and make the world safe for democracy cannot end without some lingering demand for peace and justice, or at least for something more valuable than the flu and prohibition. Even those rejecting the idea that the war could in any way help advance the cause of peace aligned with all those wanting to avoid all future wars -- a group that probably encompassed most of the U.S. population.

As Wilson had talked up peace as the official reason for going to war, countless souls had taken him extremely seriously. "It is no exaggeration to say that where there had been relatively few peace schemes before the World War," writes Robert Ferrell, "there now were hundreds and even thousands" in Europe and the United States. The decade following the war was a decade of searching for peace: "Peace echoed through so many sermons, speeches, and state papers that it drove itself into the consciousness of everyone. Never in world history was peace so great a desideratum, so much talked about, looked toward, and planned for, as in the decade after the 1918 Armistice."

Let us try to revive some memory of that foreign world on the occasion of the latest "veterans day" this Friday in this brave new era of searching for more war.

##

David Swanson is the author of "When the World Outlawed War" from which this is adapted: http://davidswanson.org/outlawry
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mudoria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-11 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. When I think of WW I
I always reflect that the war was won and the peace was lost, which led to an even more tragic war 21 years later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoCubsGo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-11 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. It was "the war to end all wars".
People never learn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-11 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. The seeds of WWII were planted in 1918...
...at Versailles...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coalition_unwilling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-11 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Actually, the seeds of World War II were planted in 1870, at the conclusion of the
Franco-Prussian war, when the territorial outlines of modern Germany under Prussian auspices took shape. Bismarck was wise about preseving the continental balance of powers, but his successors were not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-11 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. And so were the seeds of al Qaeda
http://www.opendemocracy.net/article/versailles_to_al_qaida_tunnels_of_history

The Allies, first of all the British and the French, wanting to divide among themselves the spoils of land and oil taken from the dismembered Ottoman empire, failed to recognise nascent Arab nationalism or to understand the explosive potency of Islam - as well as the depth of the feud between the Sunni and Shi'a sects; as a result, they used the mandates given by the League of Nations to divide the near east among themselves, not to groom them towards self government.

In a belief that the Arabs were too backward to rule themselves, they tried to impose political models and nations crafted after their own European models, with tacit agreement from a United States president too ready to trade away his principles. Thus, for instance, the creation ex nihilo of a sort of Arabian Yugoslavia in Mesopotamia - Iraq - out of an unstable amalgam of Sunni, Shi'a and Kurds made it at least likely that the pressures of war of the kind launched in 2003 would encourage the country to blow apart.

Andelman says that all this "was hardly a recipe for peace and prosperity. This template had, after all, led to a succession of bloody wars in Europe (...) Most Arabs wound up with a deep bitterness towards Britain and France (...) The United States inherited this enmity towards foreign overlords."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-11 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #8
14. So were the seeds of the War with Vietnam, a young Ho Chi Minh heard of Wilson's
Edited on Tue Nov-08-11 11:42 AM by Uncle Joe
call for peace and praise of democracy, Minh wanted that for Vietnam; a colony of France.

Wilson was eager to get European approval for the League of Nations; in the hopes that this institution could stave off future war but France didn't want to let loose of its' colony so Wilson never met with Ho Chi Minh; an admirer of the U.S. form of government, instead he turned toward Communism and the rest is history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coalition_unwilling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-11 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #14
25. All was not lost after 1918 though. In 1945, when the Viet Minh
marched into Hanoi, Ho read an address to the assembled masses that quoted directly from the U.S. "Declaration of Independence." The Viet Minh and OSS worked together to resist the imperial Japanese during World War II, and we had the opportunity to have a friend in Southeast Asia, if only we had been willing to tell De Gaulle he would lose his colonial possession.

Ah well.

Thanks for noting the connection. I had forgotten Ho's unsuccessful entreaty to Wilson until now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RevStPatrick Donating Member (564 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-11 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
2. 11/11/11 is St. Nigel's Day!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-11 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. Couldn't you just make it 10/10/10 and make 10 louder?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-11 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #2
26. Actually, it's the beginning of Karneval in Köln!!!
And THIS YEAR is particularly special with 3 11s and all! Just imagine it being your 11th birthday! Cölle Alaaf!!! :party:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-11 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
4. America: Where Money Trumps Peace™
Outstanding essay, Mr. Swanson! Correct in analysis and on-the-mark in what the war profiteers have meant to our nation and the future of the world.

Oh well. Hey! Just heard the NFL is the official sponsor of supporting our troops overseas...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swilton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-11 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
5. Highly Kicked and
Strongly recommended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rwsanders Donating Member (41 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-11 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
6. At the time even Congress found US participation was for profit...
I was recently at the WW2 museum in New Orleans. I can't say that it is a "fun" place although I'm sure there are some visitors who still manage to revel in the "glory" of war. The museum has done an amazing job of presenting the realities and not glorifying the war.
Recently they have put up a special display that is temporary, but I think it should be the first thing that people see when they come into the museum. It is a presentation on FDR's Four Freedoms speech. It shows how he viewed those freedoms and the second bill of rights as essential to avoiding the problems we are having now.
On one of the displays there is a statement that says that after the war a congressional commission found that U.S. entry into WW1 was motivated by the desire for profit in the arms and ammunition industries.
Which also brings me to my latest rant...
Why is it that the dumbest republican believes he knows more than everyone. Even in war, I have seen them criticize Eisenhower's Cross of Iron speech. I have had friends who have never taken a science class tell me all about the environment and how we aren't destroying it. Unbelievable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doc_Technical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-11 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #6
17. Before the US entered WWI,
The arms manufacturers were making huge profits
supplying the Allies with the weapons and
ammunition but by the end of 1916 Great Britain
and France had run out of hard currency and this
country's arms makers don't much care for I.O.U.s.
So they had the US declare war on the Central Powers
so the US taxpayers could supply cash to the merchants of death
instead of promissory notes.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-11 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
7. My grandfather got his induction notice on armistice day.
he was 48 years old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-11 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
9. The only WW1 vet I ever met said that it was bullshit. We should have stayed home. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coalition_unwilling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-11 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
10. Much as I like and admire Swanson, his account here glosses over
Edited on Tue Nov-08-11 10:41 AM by coalition_unwilling
a couple salient facts, specifically, Germany's declaration of unrestricted submarine warfare and its sinking in 1915 of the British civilian vessel Luistania, resulting in the death by drowning of some 1200 of the 1800 civilian passengers, many of them American citizens of some renown. And Swanson conveniently ignores the fact that the Schlieffen Plan, named after the German general of the same name who devised it, explicitly required that Germany violate Belgian neutrality in order to attack France. (And that's aside from the historical fact that the Kaiser gave Austria-Hungary the green light -- a blank check, if you will -- to attack Serbia, following the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand).

This is a bit off topic but people who read Swanson might come away with the impression that there was some grand moral equivalence between the two sides when the historical record is unequivocal that Imperial Germany, ever since the death of Bismarck, had been itching for a war and, when the opportunity arose, plainly violated existing treaties to which it was a signatory in order to get its war on.

Edit for clarity and garbled syntax. If the person who posted this actually is the writer David Swanson, then let me apologize up front for referring to you in the 3rd Person. I only did so because I've read so much of your work in other forums :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidswanson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-11 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. for lusitania lies and related background
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chervilant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-11 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. See also
The American Age, by LaFeber.

(Great post, David. Quite telling that so few DUers have read and/or commented...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-11 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
13. big K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Balderdash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-11 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
16. I don't know about all of that but...
I celebrate and honor our Veterans on 11/11/11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malthaussen Donating Member (413 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-11 07:57 AM
Response to Original message
19. Of WWI, all I can say
... is that it is beyond doubt the greatest exhibition of human stupidity ever scene on such a scale. Other wars may have killed more people, destroyed more property, and cost more money, but the Great War was the quintessential example of the insistence of human leaders to run the same play again and again, even when it is obviously not working. As for the millions of young men who willingly, devotedly, and continuously marched into machine-gun fire with only a shirt and a pocket Testament as armor, all I can say is... pity the poor fools. Most of them thought they were doing the right thing.

-- Mal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidswanson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-11 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. and millions more since
including in the second and greater catastrophe that shall not be questioned
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MarianJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-11 12:06 AM
Response to Original message
22. I think that a very good case can be made for the argument that...
...WWI was the STUPIDEST damn war ever fought.

And that's saying something!

PEACE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hardrada Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-11 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. The troops were supposed to be home "before the leaves fall."
All the 1914 soldiers fell instead. Sooner or later in that war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MarianJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-11 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
24. Another point about wars.
As David pointed out, there were statements about the troops being home before the Autumn leaves fell.

Many thought that the Civil War would last fir 1 battle.

In 2003 we were told that we'd be treated as liberators.

Gee! I guess that the study of history really isn't that important! :crazy:

PEACE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC