http://blogs.villagevoice.com/runninscared/2011/11/rightbloggers_d_9.phpWhen last we looked in on the Occupy movement, we saw that it was being Nixonized by rightbloggers -- that is, the occupiers and their supporters were being treated as dirty hippies who would be rebuked by a Silent Majority of Americans more sympathetic to Wall Street, big banks, and Republicans.
A few weeks in, the strategy seems not to have changed, though the intensity of their emotions has increased. When occupiers have done damage, large or small, rightbloggers have been outraged. And when the occupiers have been assaulted, rightbloggers have been pleased. They're sort of like the hard hats of the early 70s, except much less inclined toward manual labor.
Clashes between police and protesters at Oakland and elsewhere, though denounced by movement figures, gave rightbloggers room to portray the occupations as an armed rebellion that had to be stopped before it invaded our homes.
"The Occupy movement would seem to be the latest heirs to the 'Vandal tradition,'" claimed Sister Toldjah, "despising the civilization that's given them so much, making incoherent demands, and engaging in barbaric and even criminal behavior." (It's like every parent-of-a-hippie's lament: We gave the kid everything, and he still won't cut his hair or move out of that filthy commune.)