Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Didn't Obama order benefits for same sex spouses of federal employees?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
TwixVoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 10:39 PM
Original message
Didn't Obama order benefits for same sex spouses of federal employees?
I recall reading an article that stated Obama had issued an executive order granting benefits to same sex partners of federal employees. I was browsing across the OPM web site and happened to find this page:

http://www.opm.gov/insure/lifeevents/le4a.asp

Why is it that (according to this site) same sex partners are eligible for nothing despite the fact Obama issued an executive order?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. Article from earlier: "Obama orders more benefits for same-sex partners of federal workers"
Obama orders more benefits for same-sex partners of federal workers
June 02, 2010|By the CNN Wire Staff

President Barack Obama on Wednesday ordered executive-branch agencies to extend to employees' same-sex partners the same benefits provided to their opposite-sex partners,to the extent allowed by law.

The move followed up on Obama's memorandum last year that extended some benefits to same-sex partners of government workers and ordered federal agencies to review additional benefits that also could be available under existing laws.

"That process has now concluded, and I am proud to announce that earlier today, I signed a memorandum that requires executive agencies to take immediate action to extend to the same-sex domestic partners of federal employees a number of meaningful benefits, from family assistance services to hardship transfers to relocation expenses,"
Obama said in a statement.

Since taking office in January 2009, Obama has called for the repeal of the "don't ask, don't tell" policy that bans openly gay and lesbian soldiers from military service.
Under criticism from gay rights activists for a lack of progress on the issue, congressional Democrats pushed for legislative action that led to a recent compromise with the White House and the Pentagon on a conditional repeal once the military completes a review on how to implement the change.

The compromise language has passed the House and the Senate Armed Services Committee, with a full Senate vote expected in coming weeks.
The president also has urged Congress to pass the Domestic Partners Benefit and Obligations Act, which would extend family benefits now available to heterosexual federal workers to gay and lesbian federal workers as well.

http://articles.cnn.com/2010-06-02/us/obama.gay.benefits_1_same-sex-partners-federal-workers-benefits?_s=PM:US
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwixVoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. So in other words this is code
for "I signed an executive order to pay for moving expenses".... because it looks to me like any tangible REAL benefit of any importance (i.e. health insurance) is NOT available in any shape or form.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Things that are prescribed by DOMA, he can't change by an Executive Order.
It reminds me of them changing the terminology on passports to "parent 1" and "parent 2" instead of "Mother" & "Father".

They change what they can through Executive Order or regulations but they are limited by defined statutes in some areas (until those statutes are repealed or overturned).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. benefits are by act of Congress
not executive order.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. so is war n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. declarations of war are congressional
unfortunately, that doesn't seem to cover all of them. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. Yes, just like he "ordered" the closing of GITMO....
...and like he ORDERED the British Petroluem Corp
to stop dumping the internationally outlawed carcinogen 'Corexit' into
the Gulf of Mexico.....

In all those cases, 'President' Obama has issued direct orders,
and those orders have been LAUGHED AT and ignored..
All those cases, and many more...

Wake up and smell the KKKoffee, TwixVoy:
Obama is a puppet who controls NOTHING,
and that whole "DEMOCRACY" thing
we learned about in grade school
isn't a real thing anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoopla Phil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. Just like the emancipation proclamation didn't actually free any slaves.
It took a constitutional amendment to do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 03:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC