Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Paterno was fired for one main reason - to protect the school from Lawsuits

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-11 01:55 AM
Original message
Paterno was fired for one main reason - to protect the school from Lawsuits
He still had to go. He knew what Sandusky was doing for over a decade and kept silent. Now I've read where Paterno may have known what Sandusky was doing back in 1999. That's now 12 years of knowledge and not once doing something about it (and that goes for Curley and Spanier too).

I strongly suspect that there will be a lawsuit against Penn State and the men who knew but never report the crime. If that was your kid that was molested and you found out that several people KNEW that the guy was a pedophile and did nothing - you're gonna want to make someone pay.

If PSU Board of Trustees didn't fire everyone involved they could be held liable too.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Nostradammit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-11 01:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. Ayup.
And every one of those jerks needs to be sued into oblivion. How in the hell do you go to
work everyday with someone you know to be raping children at work?


How the hell do they sleep at night?


Has the world gone mad?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-11 02:03 AM
Response to Original message
2. Closing the barn door..
But the livestock has long since bolted..

Not going to make a bit of difference, this is probably gonna end up at least in the millions and possibly tens of millions.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticAverse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-11 04:45 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yeah a little late for lawsuit prevention... it's face saving now. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-11 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. +1 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HubertHeaver Donating Member (430 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-11 02:37 AM
Response to Original message
3. The PSU Board of Trustees didn't fire everyone involved...yet.
There are allegations that date back to the early '90s. The entire football program needs to be taken down. I would go so far as to say they should forfeit the remainder of this season.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backwoodsbob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-11 05:15 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. why should they punish kids who werent even there?
the current players have nothing to do with this...why punish the?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HubertHeaver Donating Member (430 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-11 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Its not to punish the current players. Shut down the football
program now to get the attention of the administrators so the problem will be fully addressed. That also sends a message to other institutions that such "covering" behaviors will not be tolerated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-11 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #5
14. The NCAA could allow them to transfer without penalty
Give the seniors another year of eligibility. They'll just wear a different colored uniform on Saturdays and play in a different stadium.

As to the original point, the University will not be avoiding any lawsuits. But their action might ameliorate some of the monetary damages that are going to be awarded. I don't know Joe Paterno, but I'm confident he would say that he is not greater than Pennsylvania State University; the folks who think otherwise are simply wrong. The university trustees may not have acted as swiftly as they should have, but they acted correctly when they finally did act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-11 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. Mike McQueary, the graduate student who saw Sandusky in the shower in 2002...
and reported it to Paterno, is still an assistant coach at Penn State. As far as I'm concerned, he's involved in the cover-up - he was a witness to a crime and reported it to the school instead of the police - and should also be fired.

The fact that he's now a credible witness to the Grand Jury is immaterial. He helped cover up a sexual assault 10 years ago.

Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-11 07:18 AM
Response to Original message
6. B-I-N-G-O!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Downwinder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-11 07:24 AM
Response to Original message
7. The police knew about it in 1998, are not they as culpable?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-11 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
11. Imo, it's too late
Penn State can get ready. Lawsuits are forthcoming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TBF Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-11 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Yes - at this point it is simply damage control. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-11 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Trust me, they'll be dragged into all of this too
But they have to have some kind of defense. The Board of Trustees are basically going to plead that they didn't know but when they did they took immediate action in firing anyone who did know.

Maybe they won't have to pay out as much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hifiguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-11 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
15. The lawsuits are going to come fast and furious
anyway. And the plaintiffs are going to get massive settlements. No way that Penn State is EVER gonna let these actions go to trial. No freaking way.

The one question that occurs to my legally trained mind in this is: What did McQueary (sp?) actually tell Paterno that he saw? Not that, given the other evidence, it lets Paterno off the hook whatsoever, but some degree of Paterno'a culpability by silence does go to the question of what he was told about the "shower incident."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aerows Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-11 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
16. They can't stop it now
They KNEW. Higher ups, including the President of Penn State KNEW. They covered it up, and thought it would go away. Sandusky was caught two different times with boys in the shower by two different people right in the middle of assaulting them. A wrestling coach caught him with a little boy at another place and banned him from the school just on the basis that it looked inappropriate.

Heck, the POLICE listened in on a phone call between the mother of one victim and Sandusky and he ADMITTED that what he did with her son was inappropriate - at least in that case, the boy didn't get raped, he just got a nasty old pervert rubbing his naked body against him.

This was covered up, and there is no way to stop it now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 01:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC