the central pillar of Europe’s political stability since World War II.The nightmare scenario would also be a 1930’s-style victory for political extremism. Fascism, Nazism, and communism were children of a backlash against globalization that had been building since the end of the nineteenth century,
feeding on the anxieties of groups that felt disenfranchised and threatened by expanding market forces and cosmopolitan elites.Faced with the choice between equity and economic integration,
communists chose radical social reform and economic self-sufficiency. Faced with the choice between national assertion and globalism,
fascists, Nazis, and nationalists chose nation-building.Fortunately, fascism, communism, and other forms of dictatorships are passé today. But
similar tensions between economic integration and local politics have long been simmering. Europe’s single market has taken shape much faster than Europe’s political community has; economic integration has leaped ahead of political integration.
It is the extreme right that has benefited most from the centrists’ failure. In Finland, the heretofore unknown True Finn party capitalized on the resentment around eurozone bailouts to finish a close third in April’s general election.
In the Netherlands, Geert Wilders’ Party for Freedom wields enough power to play kingmaker; without its support, the minority liberal government would collapse.
In France, the National Front, which finished second in the 2002 presidential election, has been revitalized under Marine Le Pen.
The challenge is to develop a new political narrative emphasizing national interests and values without overtones of nativism and xenophobia. If centrist elites do not prove themselves up to the task, those of the far right will gladly fill the vacuum, minus the moderation.http://globalpublicsquare.blogs.cnn.com/2011/11/09/europes-next-nightmare-right-wing-extremism/