Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Panel: Test every child for cholesterol by age 11

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-11-11 01:25 PM
Original message
Panel: Test every child for cholesterol by age 11
http://enews.earthlink.net/article/top?guid=20111111/3ecad5d1-4f29-442d-ae30-520cbd6a727b

CHICAGO (AP) — Every child should be tested for high cholesterol by age 11 so steps can be taken to prevent heart disease later on, a panel of doctors urged Friday in new advice that is sure to be controversial.

They also advise diabetes screening every two years starting as early as 9 for children who are overweight and have other risks for Type 2 diabetes, including family history.

The recommendations are in new guidelines from an expert panel appointed by the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute and endorsed by the American Academy of Pediatrics. They were released online Friday by the journal Pediatrics and will be presented Sunday at an American Heart Association conference in Florida.

Until now, major medical groups such as the pediatrics academy have advised cholesterol tests only for children with a family history of early heart disease or high cholesterol and those who are obese or have diabetes or high blood pressure. But studies show that is missing many children with high cholesterol, and the number of them at risk is growing because of the obesity epidemic.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-11-11 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ka-ching, ka-ching....at how much money per test, would that be? NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-11-11 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. and in the meantime, keep lowering the acceptable number on cholesterol getting more adults on
the lifetime drugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iris27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-11-11 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. And the acceptable glucose numbers too. "Pre-diabetes", "pre-hypertension"...
in the end, we're all "pre-dead".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-11-11 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Isn't that the truth?
Pushers in white coats...!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-11-11 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. answer-
how many end-stage renal patients,diabetic amputations and strokes would it prevent? I care for way too many YOUNG patients who could have remained functional if they were able to keep tabs on stuff like cholestrol and blood sugar.It's cheaper in the long run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-11-11 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. How about working on the diets of those kids--a few more fruits and veggies,
and their cholesterol will be just fine.

I think this is an after-the-fact "solution" to sell drugs, myself. We're talking little kids, here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HockeyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-11-11 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Are these kids underweight?
I was one of them and probably still considered underweight. I didn't like this or that as a kid. No candy, cookies, soda, fried foods, chips, cheese, meat/gravy, etc. The only way I would eat pizza was to take all the cheese off. I walked around snacking on celery, carrots, and raw potatoes. The other kids called me Bugs Bunny back then. About all I would eat were salads, broiled fish with lemon (hated butter too), and sometimes pasta with just tomato sauce. My own kids growing up were only slightly less fussy. My daughter was called underweight too. Is EVERY human being in this world "at risk" of high cholesterol?

Unless there is a SPECIFIC reason to test a particular kid, all kids should not be tested. MONEY MAKING scam to line the pockets of the health industry and drug companies. Occupy Wall Street? Maybe we need to Occupy the AMA, and Pfizer, et al, besides.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-11-11 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
7. How about putting PE back into the school system?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davsand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-11-11 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Now THAT is a novel idea! Maybe discouraging video games would help too.
Seems like kids are not quite as active as kids used to be. Too much time spent on the Xbox and texting, maybe. Making PE a core part of every curriculum and maybe removing advertising for video games from all kids' programming would be a good start if they are actually serious about lifetime good health habits. I'd also think that it'd be a huge help to our overburdened medical system if HFC use was regulated in our food supply.

Oh! While we are at it, how about fixing the school lunch programs so they quit serving crap to kids?

I dunno, I'm no researcher, so maybe those ideas are just me talking out my butt, but it sure seems like a better alternative than pushing pills on kids...



Laura
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-11-11 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. More money to be made off the tests than to teach fitness.
I know - it's incredibly fucked up. It's all about profit profit profit... :argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-11-11 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. my kids have had PE thru out there years. i dont know about highschool. and elective is cross
country so he certainly gets his physical exercise thru that. but the had PE thru middle school. could even take a more aggressive advanced athletic class in 7th adn 8th
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC