Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama's payroll holiday will cost $1.2 quadrillion dollars

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Still a Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 12:18 PM
Original message
Obama's payroll holiday will cost $1.2 quadrillion dollars
over 10,000 years.

This is more than value of all the assets in the world. See how irresponsible Obama is.

Given the fact many are ignoring the fact it's for one year and insist it's permanent, this gives us a broader calculation.

Credit: DUer "Statistical"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. And Dubya's tax cut was only for ten years too..
Edited on Wed Jan-19-11 12:20 PM by Fumesucker
:eyes:

Edited for speling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katnapped Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. +1 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Still a Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. And two have been added n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. That means the Dubya tax cuts are still in effect..
After they were supposed to expire.

As it is with the income tax cut, so it will be with the payroll tax cut and everyone knows it.

When these cuts expire who is going to bell the cat and raise taxes?

Republicans?

Democrats?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. No camel's nose for you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. Jejune flamebait. Is this a supporter of the president, or a caricature of one?
:shrug:

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Hard to tell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. Thanks. I thought it was clever when I used it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Still a Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Your welcome
and the calculation shows the absurdity of those playing with the number of years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
10. And you know what will stick in the public narrative?
The payroll "holiday" will shorten the solvency horizon for social security. It won't shorten it a lot, but the fact that it has been shortened at all will be played up for all the panic it's worth, and then some. We will be told over and over again by Very Serious People that there is a "crisis" in social security funding, and that Something Must Be Done. Lucky for us there was this Bipartisan Commission on Reducing the Deficit last year, and even though it never issued a final report or made any legitimate recommendations, one of the ideas they were batting around was reducing benefits for future retirees and raising the retirement age.

You know what will be deemed a Very Serious Idea that will be Something To Be Done? And you know that anyone who says it's a bunch of hooey will be dismissed as Not Serious about the Deficit Crisis.

If I hadn't seen this movie play out a bunch of times before, I'd be inclined to agree; however, I really think it's all part of a broader scheme to punish working people, steal social security, hand it to the Big Money Boyz, and never have to pay it back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. +1 Googolplex
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. But it'll take you a googol years
to make that googolplex number of recs.

By then SS will really be out of control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. Aren't they just so cute?
As if there's an independent reality based on facts that will carry the day, rather than a narrative that's being ginned up to create a crisis or a diversion to distract from what's really going to happen. The naiveté would be endearing if the result wasn't so catastrophic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Still a Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. The fiscal impact on Social Security is zero
Edited on Wed Jan-19-11 01:05 PM by Still a Democrat
The revenue is being replaced from the general fund. President Obama insisted on that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Which turns SS into "welfare" ..
Mission Accomplished..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NickB79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #13
24. Relying on the general fund for part of it's funding makes it vulnerable to Republican attacks
That's why it was set up as it was by FDR to be self-sufficient 70 frigging years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. SS will require general funding no matter what starting in 2015.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. False the payroll tax holiday will have absolutely no effect on solvency horizon.
The $120B not paid by payroll taxes will be paid by general fund.

Net-net not a single penny change in the value of the SSA trust.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Which promptly turns SS into a welfare program..
And we all know how much Americans looooove welfare programs.

Mission Accomplished.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Hardly. Everyone pays, everyone gets a benefit.
That is unlike any welfare program I have ever seen.

Show me some polls that indicate a greater % of the population thinks SS is welfare and we can talk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. But now that SS is coming at least in part from general revenue..
We all know it won't take the right wingers long at all to point to it as a form of welfare.

Which is the plan, make SS appear like welfare and it will go the way of AFDC.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Right Wingers say a lot of stupid shit that isn't true. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #22
30. Yeah, things like "Saddam has WMDs"...
The point being that a big percentage of the population will buy a lie if it is repeated often enough and loud enough, something at which the right wingers excel.

Saddam didn't have WMDs but we invaded Iraq because a lot of Americans believed that loudly and often told lie.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. You are aware SS will be partially funded via general fund revenue starting in 2015 no matter what.
Edited on Wed Jan-19-11 04:11 PM by Statistical
So if you are right then SS is doomed no matter what. Starting in 2015 SS expenditures will be greater than revenue and the difference will be paid by general fund (and contribute to deficit). So if funds from general fund = death of SS then the death is unavoidable.

Still this claim of yours is unsupported. I haven't heard anyone make that claim (even among those who have always wanted to destroy SS). No polls indicate people believes SS is welfare. It remains almost universally popular across all demographics. Given payroll tax is still 4.2% most people will consider SS an earned benefit and not something people get for free.

Lastly none of this has anything to do with your false claim that Obama has shortened SS insolvency horizon. The reality is it hasn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Which blogger told you that?
Edited on Wed Jan-19-11 04:04 PM by emulatorloo
Did s/he know what s/he was talking about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tkmorris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
21. You fail to address the chief objection
Which is that any tax "cut" (holiday, break, freebie, whatever), no matter how temporary, brings with it enormous pressure on politicians to extend it or make it permanent. A good rule of thumb would be to never create a tax break you do not want to exist forever because chances are good it will be.

I'd love to have an honest civil discussion about that particular problem, but haven't yet found anyone willing to join me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtown1123 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. You make an excellent point. Hope the OP responds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. Like Cash for Clunkers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #21
28. Making Work Pay credit expired.
Mortgage credit expired.
Cash for clunkers expired.

The economy is fragile stimulus is effective.
As the economy recovers and deficit hawks get bolder I expect tax cuts to expire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
26. But the death panels will save 1.4 quadrillion dollars!
Over the next 5000 years!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
31. Why did Obama add to the bush tax cuts?
Edited on Wed Jan-19-11 06:10 PM by mmonk
Why did it have to be the funding mechanism for social security? People can play games all they want but it sucks big time. I still haven't decided how it will affect my future support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC