Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why did Jerry Sandusky's wife call abuse victim weeks before his testimony

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 10:53 AM
Original message
Why did Jerry Sandusky's wife call abuse victim weeks before his testimony
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cirque du So-What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. I believe Dorothy Sandusky should be charged separately
She cannot be compelled to testify against her husband, but she enjoys no such protection if she is charged separately as an aider, abettor & enabler.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coalition_unwilling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. No matter how Mrs. Sandusky is charged, she cannot be
compelled to testify, i.e., she cannot be compelled to testify against her husband and she cannot be compelled to testify against herself. Please re-read your 5th Amendment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. Not quite accurate. See, Commonwealth v. Spetzer, in PA, she can be
Edited on Sun Nov-13-11 04:32 PM by msanthrope
compelled to divulge confidential communications between herself and the Mr because they might involve his plans to rape/murder/commit serious offenses. Majority held that these types of communication were NOT the type of marital communication envisioned by the PA legislature when it granted spousal privilege.

She can claim the 5th, but that is for her own perfidy, not his.

Link for case--and irony of ironies.....look at the DA.

http://caselaw.findlaw.com/pa-supreme-court/1163210.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cirque du So-What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. I realize what you're saying
If charges are leveled against her, however, she can be compelled to give testimony that is not incriminating to her husband...if any exists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. She can be compelled to give incriminating evidence against her husband in PA
Commonwealth v. Spetzer---

http://caselaw.findlaw.com/pa-supreme-court/1163210.html

Holy CRAP!!!! look at the DA on that one. Karma, maybe?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
3. She had to know about "it"
Sandusky took his wife and a young boy to bowl games in 98 & 99.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firehorse Donating Member (547 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
4. Self interest. Probably worried about messing up the status quo of her income, name, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
5. Sandusky and wife were spotted at the gym working out yesterday morning...
A friend was at Wolfe Furniture in State College yesterday, and the salesman helping him said he saw them at the gym that morning, working out as if they didn't have a care in the world.

I think Dorothy is probably in deep, deep denial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Many years of deep denial.
IMO, there is no way she did not know or should have known.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuckessee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
7. Was she tipped off about the grand jury investigation?
Considering the way State College, Pa. has rallied around their pedohile heroes it wouldn't surprise me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishwax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. it's been public knowledge since the end of March
and JS knew he was being investigated even before that, iirc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
8. Probably to try to get him not to testify, I would imagine.
It's not that hard to puzzle out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tnvoter Donating Member (75 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
11. She was doing her husband's bidding
I think she knew all along. There no way she did not know. The fact that he spent so much time "tucking in" the kids each night would have set off alarms for me....

someone needs to interview the adopted kids....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tnlefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Welcome tnvoter!! I found this yesterday after seeing part of an
interview with the reporter on CNN.http://www.pennlive.com/midstate/index.ssf/2011/11/who_knew_what_about_jerry_sand.html

It's rather long and the info. is under the header Early Concerns. While no allegations of abuse are specified it mentions that the biological mother, Debra Long, of the youngest adopted son, Matt, expressed concerns about her son while he was in foster care in the Sandusky home and that she and Matt both testified before the grand jury.

It make the hair on the back of my neck stand up a little.

Greetings from the Chattanooga area! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
12. Auto-Unrec for citing the Daily Mail
:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. I've seen it on the local news here, and other written sources. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
15. Maybe Ginny Thomas told her it was a good thing to do? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC