Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Book: Rahm Emanuel Dumped Tons Of Freddie Mac Stock Days Before It Collapsed

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 04:24 PM
Original message
Book: Rahm Emanuel Dumped Tons Of Freddie Mac Stock Days Before It Collapsed
Book: Rahm Emanuel Dumped Tons Of Freddie Mac Stock Days Before It Collapsed

by Zeke Miller

Former White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel is the latest lawmaker to get caught up in allegations of insider trading while a member of Congress.

Then-Rep. Emanuel reportedly sold up to $250,000 in Freddie Mac stock on February 21, 2003 days before it dropped by 10 percent — and weeks before it was publicly revealed that the entity was under criminal investigation for inflating earnings. The allegations are revealed in Peter Schwiezer'snew book "Throw Them All Out," which will hit bookshelves tomorrow.

Emanuel served on the board of the Government-backed lender before his election to Congress in 2003, and later held a seat on the House Financial Services' Committee's Subcommittee on Capital Markets, Insurance, and Government-Sponsored Enterprises — the very committee charged with regulating the Freddie Mac.
While by no means illegal; lawmakers are exempted from the insider trading laws they impose on private traders. But the timing of the trades is certainly suspect, especially given Emanuel's service on the board during the time period for with the federal government was investigating the actions of Freddie Mac executives.

Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/book-rahm-emanuel-dumped-tons-of-freddie-mac-stock-days-before-it-collapsed-2011-11#ixzz1diWQNYH0

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well, if you can't trust Peter Schwiezer, who can you trust, eh?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swede Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Of the Hoover Institute,no less.
blech
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. they're all corrupt bastards
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sixmile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's easy enough to prove
and near-fetched.

Insider trading needs to stop across the board.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sufrommich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. From a book written by Sarah Palin's "foriegn policy advisor".
Edited on Mon Nov-14-11 04:33 PM by sufrommich
Here's another book he wrote:

Architects of Ruin: How a Gang of Radical Activists and Liberal Politicians Destroyed Trillions of Dollars in Wealth in the Pursuit of Social Justice, 2009 (ISBN 0-061-95334-2)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
20. It shouldn't matter who wrote it if it's true-prosecute him!
Edited on Tue Nov-15-11 01:22 PM by mod mom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
6. The
Edited on Mon Nov-14-11 04:45 PM by ProSense
book is by a RW hack with ties to Breitbart.

Still, why is this a focus? Rahm Emanuel was only a member of Congress less than a month before this alleged incident. Maybe he had to divest?

Here's something more current to focus on: One Day After Attending Private Economic Crisis Briefing, GOP Financial Services Chairman Bet On Stocks Tanking

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Electric Monk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. More important: Is the accusation true or false? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Actually,
"More important: Is the accusation true or false?"

...this is more important.

Rahm could have sold the stock, but again, what does that have to do with anything. He was in his first couple of months in Congress. The context and details matter.

On the other hand, the context and details about Bachus' trades are current, detailed and relevant.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. If Rahm would only show his birth certificate, we could put this all behind us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. No one whose posted yet ...seems to be able to answer that question...so
it's "kill the messenger," not expose what is said as not the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
7. Really, Koko......
Why spread RW smut here? Are you just looking for negativity, without regard to where it emanates? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Then
"Why spread RW smut here?"

...people wonder who is emboldening these RW liars by giving them credibility.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
11. Trading on inside information, eh?
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. aren't there laws against that? book him!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 06:49 AM
Response to Original message
14. shocked!
not!

as if there wasn't enough to hate about rahm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 06:54 AM
Response to Original message
15. Be careful or you will be accused of palling around with Grover Norquist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 07:09 AM
Response to Original message
16. K&R
Because I didn't know...While by no means illegal; lawmakers are exempted from the insider trading laws they impose on private traders.
Why are they exempted from insider trading laws?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eShirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 07:22 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. because they are raiding the cookie jar with both hands
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CanonRay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
18. I'm starting to believe the gov't is almost completely corrupt
there are possibly a handfull of the 535 members of Congress who are not corrupt. Maybe 10 or less. This has got to stop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
THobbes Donating Member (19 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
21. "While by no means illegal" THIS IS A LIE!
PROFESSOR: Oh Please, Of Course Congressional Insider Trading Is Totally Illegal

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=post&forum=439&topic_id=2314533&mesg_id=2314553
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
22. Martha Stewart went to JAIL for far less.
...but Rahm is a member of the Other America.

When you don't have an honest rebuttal,
ATTACK THE MESSENGER!!!




You will know them by their WORKS,
not by their excuses.
Solidarity99!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Martha wasn't in Congress
I guess that's the only criterion that matters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC