Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Washington state governor calls for draconian cuts in new budget

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 06:47 PM
Original message
Washington state governor calls for draconian cuts in new budget
In her State of the State address last week, Washington’s Democratic governor Christine Gregoire proposed budget cuts totaling $4.6 billion for 2011-2013, stating, “It’s not just about this crisis—it’s about setting our state on a trajectory that ensures a strong financial foundation for our kids and grandkids.”

Gregoire’s “trajectory” for the state’s younger generation, however, includes deep cuts in maternity services, early childhood education and children’s health care, not to mention severe cuts in all social services.

Coming on the heels of the previous budget’s $5.1 billion cut and a drastic $900 million cut just enacted by a special session of the Democratic-controlled legislature last December, the current proposed cuts extend the dismantling of social services for the poor and working class.

The budget would:

- eliminate basic health coverage (Apple Health) for 27,000 children

- eliminate coverage for 66,000 poor people with the removal of the Basic Health plan.

- cut a total of $1.4B from Health and Human Services,

- cut $2.2B from K-12

- cut $630.7 million from higher education

- increase tuition for state colleges by 9-11 percent,

- eliminates pre-schooling help to 1,324 children

- eliminate the Disability Lifeline Medical Plan affecting 21,000 low-income disabled adults

- eliminates the State Food Assistance Program for low-income legal immigrants

Many of these same programs came under attack in the previous 2009-2011 budget...

- state employees will pay more in pension contributions --up to 4.5% from 3.9% in 2009-2011

- State employees' portion of health care premiums will go from $86 to $147 in 2013 on average

State workers have seen no general wage increases since 2008, and unpaid temporary layoffs saw the average state employee lose $178 per month in 2010...The new budget seeks another 3 percent reduction in compensation.

As a Seattle Times article points out, more than $6.5 billion of tax revenue is lost each year due to tax subsidies for business. The legislature does not consider these items in its budget deliberations. A full 88 percent of these subsidies do not have sunset provisions, and thus do not require regular review as a matter of law. The state’s Joint Legislative Committee reviews these tax expenditures only once in 10 years. A 60 percent vote in the legislature in required to repeal any of these subsidies.

Between 1979 and 2003, the incomes of the wealthiest 1 percent of Washingtonians rose by 111 percent above inflation. Incomes for the entire top 20 percent rose by 49 percent over the same period, while incomes for the middle fifth inched up only 8.6 percent and the bottom 20 percent experienced no perceptible gain.

An effort to pass an income tax on the richest 10 percent of Washington residents failed last November. Initiative 1098 was stymied when the opposition, with a bankroll of $6.3 million, was joined by some of the world’s richest men.

Microsoft billionaires Steve Ballmer and Paul Allen, along with Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos, respectively listed at numbers 16, 17 and 18 on Forbes’ Richest People in America list, contributed heavily to defeat the initiative.

These three billionaires, all residents of Washington state, have a combined wealth of over $92 billion.

If one includes another Washington resident, Microsoft’s Bill Gates with a net worth estimated at $54 billion, this amount leaps to a staggering $146 billion.

In a move to shore up its profits, Microsoft is responding to the “Cadillac tax” on more generous health insurance plans by planning on employee contributions to its plan, which up to now has been covered by the corporation. (except for its many temp workers, of course, who don't get health insurance)

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2011/jan2011/wash-j19.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ow. Sure glad I don't live here in WA. oops, I do. ow ow ow
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. and so it goes. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. as usual, government is about protecting the privileges of the wealthy...
...and the corporations, and protecting them from taxation. As long as sufficient wealth exists within a state to meet the needs of ALL its citizens, there is no excuse at all-- NONE!-- for cutting services to the poor EXCEPT to protect the wealthy from being called upon to do their share.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. The same thing is going to happen in every state, initiating phase 2 of Great depression v.2.0.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. yup, already underway here in California....
Ouch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kennah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. Evergreen Staters brought some of this upon ourselves ...
... when we collectively voted No on I-1098 and Yes on I-1107.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Indeed
Gov. Gregoire is simply carrying out the will of the people, as expressed in their popular vote. There's going to be a whole lot of pain in Washington in the next couple of years. It remains to be seen whether any of the West Coast states can learn how to fund the government programs they want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I don't think it's that clear-cut. If the legislature had wanted to propose a wealth tax
that would get support, a two-year special 2% levy on income over $500K would have done nicely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kennah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I would agree with you ...
... in the case of I-1098. Perhaps the legislature could muster the moxie to do it, but I will not be holding my breath.

It's my understanding that I-1107 was NOT revenue neutral so it did have a direct impact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. not sure what the point is about revenue-neutral. it wasn't supposed to be revenue-neutral, was it?
it was supposed to be revenue-positive.

i think voters rejected it because it seemed to unfairly target one industry.

)they don't much care about that for tobacco & alcohol, though...(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kennah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. If it's not revenue neutral, then it opens up a hole in the budget
IIRC, one of the liquor proposals was revenue neutral and the other was not. I-1107 wasn't revenue neutral so it made the hole, at least some of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. didn't hear that; you're saying it *cost* the state money to increase taxes on pop?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kennah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Not entirely
My understanding of the initiatives, based on an hour long program that KOMO (I think) did before the election, is that they are either revenue neutral or not.

Some of the initiatives were revenue neutral in that the initiative essentially said we will not longer get X dollars from here, instead we'll get it from there.

Others, including I-1107, were not revenue neutral.

The taxes that I-1107 repealed were part of the compromise which Olympia devised. Some I-1107 supporters made flippant statements to the effect of, "We want our lawmakers to do their job and make the tough choices." To them I say, duh. Olympia did, so now more cuts ensue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. 1107 repealed the tax on pop put in in 2010. i guess i don't get your point.
Edited on Wed Jan-19-11 08:13 PM by Hannah Bell
of course pulling a tax isn't revenue-neutral.

but it wasn't voted down for being non-revenue-neutral.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kennah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. You are correct that it was voted down because people love bottled water and soda
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. it was voted down because people didn't get why soda was being focused on to solve a general budget
problem.

i still don't your convoluted point about revenue-neutrality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
25. sad, apparently it wasn't even close
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
5. My daughter just got her layoff notice
rom King County Public Health. She has 10 days left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. best wishes to your daughter....
Damn, it's a tough time to be out of work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. That is so sad. All of these cuts are going to hurt the economy.
Why don't these stupid governors understand that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
14. The same exact proposal is being made in Arizona right now. HOW do these people sleep at nite?
In Arizona I'm sure it will pass.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
16. FFS!! Three billionaires with a combined wealth of over $92 billion
I think there's a simple remedy here

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
18. The point is: If these people DIE, we will have more money!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
21. recommend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC