Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Should Reid allow a vote on repealing HCR?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 06:57 PM
Original message
Should Reid allow a vote on repealing HCR?
Edited on Wed Jan-19-11 06:58 PM by Proud Liberal Dem
I'm not asking this as a detractor of the law nor as somebody who in any way supports repealing the PPACA (I would definitely like to see it expanded, however) but even though repealing PPACA is DOA in the Senate and is not going to make it to the front door of the WH, I'm wondering if it might be worthwhile for Reid to hold a quick up-or-down vote on it in the Senate as a way of showing people that the Democrats are willing to allow a difficult and potentially embarrassing vote and let the chips fall where they may (which is to say nowhere in regards to repealing the Health Care Law of course). If Reid holds a vote, the Republicans won't be able to hammer the Democrats in the Senate for the next 2 years for refusing to allow a vote on it and use it to help whip up support for taking the Senate and, possibly, the WH in 2012- if it even is likely to make any difference to people in the first place. Thought? Opinions? Flames?

:hide:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. No. It would be a waste of time.
The President would veto the bill regardless of what happens in the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. No. It will just give Obama the chance to capitulate to the Rethugs and sign it into law. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Cute Snark. But totally ridiculous
Obama spent 2 years getting HCR passed. He is not going to sign a repeal of it. Don't be silly! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Yes, it was sarcastic.
But only a teeny-weeny bit. :fistbump:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sharesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. It would probably be healthy, so to speak.
There is a lot of fear in the Senate to go on record with a No vote.

So assume it is allowed to be voted on and passes in the Senate and goes to the President and he vetoes.

What does the override vote look like? Fails in the House as well as the Senate?

Has a lot more settled feeling to it to be fully tested by two of the three branches.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. Depends
1) assuming we have the votes to defeat it and
2) assuming it wouldn't waste too much time

Yes. That way, we gave it an upper-down vote and it failed. We're the good guys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. If it's a legal vote, sure.
Let the process play out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
6. nope. Repeal should die in the closet of dead bills.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
7. the senate already voted on healthcare and it won...
Edited on Wed Jan-19-11 07:18 PM by spanone
dems control the senate...

if this were reversed the republicans wouldn't even consider the consideration
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orangepeel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
8. We should make a deal
Hold the vote on the last day of the 2012 session if the republicans don't filibuster anything before that.

What happened with that filibuster reform vote, BTW?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
10. What kind of a vote?
A vote to bring the bill to the floor? That takes 60 votes.

A vote on cloture? That also takes 60 votes.

A vote on the actual bill? That takes 51 votes where Obama's veto pen awaits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
11. I'm hoping it doesn't even get that far
I see no reason why it should even get a hearing in committee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Second Stone Donating Member (603 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
12. Absolutely not
It shouldn't ever get out of committee. The Senate should not be in the position of letting the minority dictate all the items that get on the agenda or are held up forever in committee. It should in fact be filibustered by the most irrelevant Senator they can find.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. I agree that it deserves no real serious consideration
I'm just talking about a quick and dirty "symbolic" vote to shut 'em up (to help us end their delusions of persecution).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
14. Follow up question (self-hijack)
Edited on Wed Jan-19-11 08:28 PM by Proud Liberal Dem
is opposition to the PPACA so intense that a refusal to hold a vote in the Senate will have a potential traction with the electorate? Or, more accurately, will the Republicans be able to get some mileage in 2012 by hammering the Dems for refusing to allow a vote in the Senate- or will most people view the House's vote tonight with a collective shrug and move on? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. If you have watched the evening news, there has been very little coverage, and on the
M$M just remedial coverage. There was four minutes of coverage on Rep. Giffords and maybe a 20 second blurb about the repeal vote in the house of the health care plan enacted last year. No screaming or shouting videos. Maybe the teabaggers realized that maybe this bill was what they wanted??

I think in six months this will long be forgotten by the public.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
16. If the other side agree to an up down vote on public option
if you're going to have a show, I want the full show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC