Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Appeals Court Says Owners May Sue to Recover the Sentimental Value of a Dog

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 07:00 PM
Original message
Appeals Court Says Owners May Sue to Recover the Sentimental Value of a Dog
Appeals Court Says Owners May Sue to Recover the Sentimental Value of a Dog

FORT WORTH (CN) - A Texas appeals court ruled that the owners of a mistakenly euthanized dog can sue to recover the sentimental value of their lost pet, reversing and remanding the ruling of a trial court. The closely reasoned opinion cites more than a century of Texas courts rulings on dogs.

The Court of Appeals for the 2nd District of Texas reinstated Kathryn and Jeremy Medlen's negligence lawsuit against Carla Strickland, a City of Fort Worth animal shelter employee.

According to court filings, their 8-year-old Labrador mix, Avery, escaped from the Medlens' back yard and was picked up by the city's animal control.

Jeremy Medlen went to the shelter to bail out Avery, but did not have enough cash in hand to pay the fees. He was told he could return the next day and that a hold-for-owner tag would be placed on Avery's cage, to prevent him from being euthanized. But Avery was killed the next day before the Medlens could pick him up.

http://www.courthousenews.com/2011/11/15/41444.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's the first time I've heard of that, but it actually seems fair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalNative Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. What animal shelter
doesn't take credit cards? Especially one in a city like Fort Worth?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandyj999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. Sounds just like Detroit Animal Control, they love killing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. It's about frigging time. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. If this becomes a trend, expect veterinary liability insurance costs
to skyrocket. And yes, we WILL pass that expense on to clients in full. Probably with extra tacked on for the time, energy, and heartache when every Tom, Dick, and Harry decides we are just more deep pockets to be picked.

I am not unsympathetic to folks who lose their pets. But please do consider those unintended consequences.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. There will have to be some legal categories developed if this moves forward...
There is no way that a veterinarian providing standard-of-care therapy (with a fully informed and consenting owner) should be liable to the level of a gross negligent act. Not sure what happened with this particular shelter's accidental euthanasia, but if they did not follow their own policies developed to ensure an animal is kept sufficiently long to allow for owner recovery or for rabies quarantine (in the event of a bite exposure to a human), for example, then that could rise to the level of gross negligence.

I agree with your concerns, however... Veterinary association representatives and state board personnel will need to be at the table if legislation is developed around this premise--that's for sure.

On the other hand, I'd like to think this might send a very strong signal to law enforcement that shooting a pet without cause--as has occurred in many recent high profile events-- will have very significant cost and repercussions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. The problem: people can sue anyone for anything. The only lawsuit I have ever
been involved in as a vet was a FEDERAL lawsuit involving 40 defendants that dragged on for two years. Yes, it eventually was dismissed against all defendants - I was dead last, lol. But people can make a mess of your life and career with ZERO legal justification, and this will just give them more motive to do so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. True... but I've been subject to that kind of crap both professionally
Edited on Tue Nov-15-11 09:31 PM by hlthe2b
and personally... Both were baseless and eventually dismissed, but, I must say the more personal suit was the biggest annoyance.

Our society is litigious... It goes with the territory. At least with a professional suit, you have your liability insurer behind you, which can sometimes push back some of the nonsense crap from going too far. But, I surely can empathize.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Withywindle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-11 04:27 AM
Response to Reply #7
18. I thought of the pet shootings by police right away when I read the OP
"We had the wrong address on that drug raid. Oops. Our bad. Oh, and by the way, we shot your dog cause it barked at us when we kicked your door down. We still cool, right? You know, shit happens. Oh, u mad? Too bad, we're the cops, there's nothing you can do."



Pet owners in that horrific situation need an avenue of recourse that will involve serious incentives on the parts of municipal governments to make sure their cops know it is NOT okay to do this.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bryn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. That frigging vet killed my hearing/signal dog
named Shane 4 yrs ago. She was 6 years old and could read over 100 words in sign language. She was my best friend, my partner that went everywhere with me. We moved from Florida to Arkansas. I had taken her in for her shoulder limp. That new vet gave her a shot of steroid & told me to give her Rimadyl that caused her to have drug adversary and killed her in 3 days. I still miss her terribly to this day. I got two other dogs to train, but they both failed and are my pets, not service dog like Shane was. She was my once in lifetime dog kind. She was part rottie part german shepherd.

Please do consider this. That vet's lucky I didn't sue him. He did not give me a warning about Rimadyl that is known to kill many large breed dogs like Labs, Shepherds or I would not have taken a chance. I don't like what your post sounds like and would not want you to be my pets' vet. You sound too harsh and money is more important to you. What about my money, time, energy, love, heartache, etc. as Shane's partner/parent/best friend? It goes both ways.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Withywindle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-11 04:19 AM
Response to Reply #12
17. I'm so sorry, Bryn
What an awful loss.


:hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-11 01:03 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. when someone is at fault through negligence or just downright
careless stupidity, I don't care about the consequences. If someone killed one of my old boys through that I would kick their ass, money be damned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hassin Bin Sober Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-11 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #5
15. Your money concerns, as valid as they may be, don't change....
... the reality that beloved pets are more than just property. It's way past time the courts recognize that fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Withywindle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-11 04:18 AM
Response to Reply #5
16. This pet was not in a veterinary clinic
This was gross negligence by a shelter, and it damn well should be subject to a massive lawsuit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. Oh... Gawd... there are mistakes and then there are mistakes...
the thought of this one has me just cringing. So damned tragic for the family of that pup. :cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
8. Good...
Thing is, my pugs are like my children. If one if them got lost and was at the shelter, I wouldn't wait until the next day. I'd write them a check, give them a credit card, or hit up the nearest ATM if necessary..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RebelOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
11. Nothing new. It happens all the time. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Withywindle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-11 01:16 AM
Response to Original message
14. Good.
That's the main value of a pet, not the cost of the animal as a cash-value commodity.

What's a beloved family pet worth in the coldest monetary calculation in the case of a wrongful-death type suit? Well, not as much as a child of course, but definitely more than any replaceable inanimate object like a car.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC