Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sooo...when is that "fix" to the healthcare act coming?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 08:29 PM
Original message
Sooo...when is that "fix" to the healthcare act coming?
I seem to remember that there was a rallying cry of 'pass it now, fix it later.'

How's that fix coming?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's stored in the Bullshit Queue now. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neverforget Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. and that seems to have an infinite capacity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. It has to. It's the ONLY queue. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. Are you serious?
We couldn't fix it now if we wanted to. Not with the Republicans controlling the House.

We need to elect more progressives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I'm just curious...
So many people were adamant that it would definitely be fixed later, and that was why it was fine to pass it in its then-current state.

I'm just wondering where that 'definitely going to happen' fix is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. The Supreme Court is Going to "Fix" It
They will probably keep the individual mandates because the insurance companies like that part,
but they will do away with the part that actually requires the insurance companies to pay when you're sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Perfect! That way the insurance cos. get a steady stream of income and get to keep it, too.
Edited on Tue Nov-15-11 09:21 PM by valerief
That helps humanity. 1% of humanity. The sociopathic cross-section of humanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walerosco Donating Member (449 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
7. I think they are still
working on the NAFTA fix :) Ofc there isnt going to be a fix. If you cannot fix(public option) it with the kind of majority we had in 2009 then it never going to happen. I just wish they will give poor people a chance to opt out and not have to pay the penalty for not having insurance
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. Damn! I forgot about the NAFTA fix.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kat45 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #7
17. In Mass., poor people are exempt from buying it.
I don't know what the income level is, but last year I barely worked and had such little income that I would not have been penalized if I didn't have insurance. But I did have insurance that I got through the 'connector,' through the state. When I had a part-time job with low income, I had to pay something like $77 a month. When I had no income, I had no premium. The federal plan is supposedly based on the Mass. plan, so perhaps it will be like that too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walerosco Donating Member (449 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-11 01:15 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. lets hope you are right about this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-11 06:07 AM
Response to Reply #17
21. Big whoop. The result has been a drop in the % of bankruptcies due fo
--health care costs from 59% to 50%. You'll be OK unless you actually get sick, in which case you are fucked. But the odds are with you--you are likely to stay in that 85% of peoplw who account for only 15% of health care costs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
10. They's fixin' ta fix it right quick, now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
11. Can we have it get through the legal challenges and actually take effect first?

Seriously


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. common sense is wasted in a thread like this.
an o.p. like this is not looking for an actual answer.
it's just looking to score snark points.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tiny elvis Donating Member (619 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
12. thepoorman.net classic 8/3/2005
Phase II is where you go fuck yourself
Posted by The Editors under Uncategorized


Sen. Diane Feinstein writes letters:

I am increasingly dismayed by the delay in completing the Committee’s ‘Phase II’ investigation into intelligence prior to the Iraq War. As you know, the Committee voted unanimously on February 12, 2004 to investigate five questions on pre-war intelligence, including use of intelligence by policymakers. Nearly eighteen months later, much work remains before these questions will be satisfactorily answered.

In addition to the terms set out early last year, the Committee should address the significant issues raised by the so-called ‘Downing Street Memo’ – whether the ‘intelligence and facts were being fixed’ to support the policy of using military force against Iraq. This claim raises serious questions about the use of intelligence, and whether intelligence resources were unduly focused away from other priorities in order to provide additional – and as we have found, flawed – intelligence on Iraq.

It would also be my preference to include in Phase II any new revelations concerning the CURVEBALL case since the Committee’s first Iraq report.

It is important that the Committee complete its study of these questions, both to fulfill our oversight responsibilities and because there is no other body capable of doing this work. The Committee’s report assessing the intelligence on Iraq ’s WMD capabilities was of outstanding quality and demonstrated both our ability to inform the American public and uncover needs for intelligence reform. I urge you to take whatever steps are needed to complete the Phase II investigation and produce a report as comprehensive and thoughtful as the first phase of the Committee’s investigation. I stand ready to participate in this investigation in any way possible.
------------

Yeah. Um, I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but there’s not going to be a Phase II report. There was no Earthly reason not to handle all the intel issues in one report, but you agreed, for reasons that remain unclear to me, to give Bush the political cover he wanted and not force any questions about just what the fuck was up with all that aluminum tube bullshit. There were too many issues to deal with? Give me a break. There appeared to be ample time for endless, pointless panty-sniffing around Joseph Wilson - for some reason, the issue of whether some guy who wrote a critical editorial is a bad person could get addressed right away. Were we lied into war? That question can wait forever, apparently. Bullshit.

Democrats, clue in: “I’ll gladly pay you Thursday for a hamburger today” is not a good deal. Hamburger stands don’t work that way, because it’s not a good deal. So stop agreeing to it. Fucking figure it out. If the Republicans wanted two reports, let Phase I deal with the issues of substance, and let Phase II be an in-depth Congressional Intelligence report exclusively devoted to concerns that Joseph Wilson is a bad man who squeezes the toothpaste tube from the middle or whatever. You got chumped, chumps. They chumped you chumps again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
13. LOL. They were worried we'd let perfect get in the way of crappy for us; milk and honey for the 1%
MORE milk and honey.

I seem to remember someone saying that it needed to be passed so we could find out what was in it. What was her name again?

Man oh man what a piece of wool they pulled over our eyes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-11 01:30 AM
Response to Original message
19. There was never any intention to fix it.
Edited on Wed Nov-16-11 01:31 AM by woo me with science
They have mandated that EVERY SINGLE AMERICAN CITIZEN to purchase an outrageously overpriced corporate product. Think about that. What a coup.

And they managed to do it by pitting us against each other to get us to accept what neither side would have tolerated had it been proposed this way at the outset.

The corporate mandate was the goal all along. That was the gift to the corporate insurance companies.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
area51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-11 03:33 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. +1
Unlike what some people think, the GOP '93 plan will not get us to single-payer. It only leads to slavery to the serial-killer insurance cartels.

"Subtitle F: Universal Coverage - Requires each citizen or lawful permanent resident to be covered under a qualified health plan or equivalent health care program by January 1, 2005."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-11 06:15 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. +1000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dorian Gray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-11 06:38 AM
Response to Reply #19
24. You know
I thought that was a problem back when it was passed, but it seems like such an obvious slap in the face to those of us who truly wanted to reform the health care industry in this country.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-11 06:18 AM
Response to Original message
23. TSCOTUS will fix it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC