Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Approval of Whale Harm May Last 5 Years

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-11 03:43 PM
Original message
Approval of Whale Harm May Last 5 Years
Approval of Whale Harm May Last 5 Years



WASHINGTON (CN) - The National Marine Fisheries Service proposes to extend the period for which the agency allows activities that may harm marine mammals incidental to U.S. Navy sonar and munitions testing.

Under the Marine Mammal Protection Act, the National Marine Fisheries Service, acting for the Secretary of Commerce, may allow the incidental, but not intentional, harm of marine mammals for periods of up to 5 years if it determines that the harm will have a "negligible impact" on a particular species.

While the agency publishes regulations governing harm or "take" in each specific testing range on a 5 year basis, actual take has to be approved every year, after the agency considers take from the previous year.

The new rules would suspend annual authorization and allow the agency to issue, in some cases, authorizations valid for 5 years.

http://www.courthousenews.com/2011/11/16/41476.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mimosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-11 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R. Subs over whales has been going on a long time.
SAD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-11 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. They learned nothing from Star Trek
why would they care what happens to whales when they care so little about
humans...........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-11 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. Ugh... why? To save money?
Why would they do this?

And can anyone translate this to English for me?

While the Navy still would have to file annual reports on the impact of munitions and sonar testing on marine mammals, annual caps on take of any one species by any one source would be dropped in favor of a cumulative maximum take per source, per species over the period of authorization
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC