Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

California legal precedent against the use of pepper spray upon the non-violent.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 05:11 AM
Original message
California legal precedent against the use of pepper spray upon the non-violent.
Edited on Sat Nov-19-11 05:14 AM by Fire Walk With Me
http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-9th-circuit/1332957.html

HEADWATERS FOREST DEFENSE v. COUNTY OF HUMBOLDT

Nine environmental activists and an environmental group brought this action, under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, against the County of Humboldt, the Humboldt County Sheriff's Department, Eureka City and its police department, and several individual officers, alleging that the officers' use of pepper spray on the activists' eyes and faces during three peaceful protests constituted an excessive use of force in violation of their Fourth Amendment rights.   We previously issued an opinion, which is reported at 240 F.3d 1185 (9th Cir.2001), in which we reversed the district court's decision to grant summary judgment on qualified immunity grounds to Humboldt County Sheriff Dennis Lewis (“Lewis”) and Chief Deputy Sheriff Gary Philip (“Philip”), the defendants who initially authorized the use of the pepper spray on the nonviolent protestors. We also reversed the district court's decision to enter judgment in favor of Humboldt County, the City of Eureka, and their respective police departments following trial and a hung jury.


Viewing the facts in the light most favorable to the protestors, we conclude that Philip and Lewis are not entitled to qualified immunity because the use of pepper spray on the protestors' eyes and faces was plainly in excess of the force necessary under the circumstances, and no reasonable officer could have concluded otherwise.

-------

Thank you Anonymous for this juicy tidbit. UC Davis pepper-sprayer...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 05:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. Pepper spray down the throat till they coughed blood?
There better not be a place on this earth where that is legal and acceptable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PufPuf23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. The legal system in Humboldt county is incestuous and corrupt. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danascot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. Great find, thanks
In our gut we know it was wrong. Now we know it is against the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danascot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
3. More good info on pepper spray & California law
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. Oh, of course -- the Earth First! case
http://www.earthfirstjournal.org/article.php?id=232

On April 28, a California jury unanimously found the direct application of pepper spray to protesters’ eyes with Q-tips to be excessive force in violation of their constitutional rights (see EF!J November-December 2004). One juror said that the jury helped to set a precedent that “nonviolent people should not have violence used against them.”

When asked if Humboldt County deputies would resume using pepper spray on nonviolent protesters, Sheriff Gary Philp acknowledged the defeat, saying, “We’re not going to do a practice that is just going to put us back in court.”

As one of the Pepper Spray 8, the plaintiffs in this case, I am grateful for this positive outcome. It was a long, hard haul. We went through three federal jury trials and appeals to the Ninth Circuit and Supreme Courts. In the end, each of us was awarded one dollar for the violation of our rights. The county and city insurance companies will hopefully compensate our pro bono lawyers for their costs and fees. . . .

A line had been crossed. Pepper spray was not being used for self-defense as designed, but in a controlled, non-threatening situation. It was being used to punish protesters, so that they would remain in pain whether or not they complied with the officers.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. This case is the first thing I thought of when I saw the UC Davis footage & photo...
Edited on Sat Nov-19-11 02:04 PM by Luminous Animal
The cops, in the Humboldt case, used Q-Tips to apply pepper spray directly into the activists eyes.



More info here.

http://nopepperspray.org/

It took nearly 10 years for these activists to realize justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lib_wit_it Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 03:28 AM
Response to Reply #5
15. Jeezuz, WTF. Were these sociopaths punished or just told "Don't do it again, please."?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
6. Little KICK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PufPuf23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
7. Here is a link to the website devoted to the Humboldt county case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Were you able to catch Colbert and his pepper spray demo the
Other night?

He told the audience he would be demonstrating what the pepper spraying is like by using an eight year old boy.

I'll see if I can find the link.

Very funny and far more harm done to Colbert than the child (Of course!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PufPuf23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I seldom watch JS or Colbert except for links here at DU.
Back in the 90s, I did some consulting work for the Feds in Alaska.

We had to adhere to a safety plan that had field crews accompanied by an armed guard in designated brown bear areas and had to be armed or carry pepper spray in black bear areas. We only pepper sprayed each other for goofs. Our unofficial plan was to peppper spray the slowest in our group and run like hell. Somewhere in my shed I still have a near full case of pepper spray.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 03:36 AM
Response to Reply #9
16. Here ya go ....
Found this link.

The 8 year boy part starts at the :37 second mark

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3EAIzkqtKAk


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
11. Anyone see Jerry Brown lately?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eyerish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
12. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaleko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 01:47 AM
Response to Original message
13. Kick to high heaven.
Makes my blood boil to read about the precedent case.

Should stir up a hornets nest of irate lawyers to act on behalf of OWS.
That swarm is gonna hurt these cops, but we need to help make this info go viral.

We are anonymous. You, me, millions of us. And we have had enough .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 02:28 AM
Response to Original message
14. Clear violation of 4th amendment rights Pike will be sued.
KNR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PETRUS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 03:39 AM
Response to Original message
17. I had forgotten about that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
18. Kick for truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
19. Kicky-kick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC