Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MUST READ: A Historical Precedent That Might Prove A Bonus For Occupy Wall Street - UKGuardian

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 05:47 PM
Original message
MUST READ: A Historical Precedent That Might Prove A Bonus For Occupy Wall Street - UKGuardian
A historical precedent that might prove a bonus for Occupy Wall Street
In 1932, a police and army attack on the Bonus Army of impoverished first world war veterans helped seal the New Deal

Nicolaus Mills - guardian.co.uk
Saturday 19 November 2011 12.00 EST


Bonus Army marchers confront police, 1932. Photograph: US National Archives

<snip>

This Tuesday's pre-dawn destruction of the Zuccotti Park encampment of Occupy Wall Street by New York City police in riot gear has been seen by some as a serious defeat for the movement. A day after 142 Occupy Wall Street protestors were arrested and Zuccotti Park was cleared, the New York Daily News, which has been hostile to Occupy Wall Street since it began, reported, "Camp Zuccotti appears to be gone for good now."

But if history is any guide, the raid on Occupy Wall Street and the destruction of the tents and sleeping bags the protesters left behind is not likely to have the effect the movement's foes want. The Great Depression offers a striking parallel to this week's attack on Occupy Wall Street.

In 1932, a police and Army raid on the Bonus Army of first world war veterans, who had come to Washington, DC to ask for immediate payment of their Adjusted Service Certificates (whic everyone called their bonus), resulted in an Occupy Wall Street-like rout. But in the end, the vets were the ones who prevailed and gained public sympathy.

The 1932 raid reached its peak of violence on 29 July when Washington's commissioners and President Herbert Hoover gave the Army the authority to evict the marchers from empty government buildings near the Capitol and from their makeshift camps along the Anacostia River. The Army chief of staff, General Douglas MacArthur, aided by Major Dwight Eisenhower and 600 troops, backed up by tanks and cavalry, confronted the vets, tear-gassing them and setting fire to the shacks they had been living in.

<snip>

More: http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2011/nov/19/historical-precedent-bonus-occupy?newsfeed=true

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think what Bloomberg did, has energized the movement. He f'd up big time nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. All kinds of people who would not go near an actual camp or march
are taking courage from the fact that someone, somewhere is voicing their frustrations and fears.

Actions like those of OWS build unity among people who are shamed by the rich into silence and feelings of guilt about their poverty.

I have a friend who recently lost her job and had to move back in with family. She is a very capable woman with a long, successful work record, and her job loss has left her bitter and frightened.

She was delighted to hear on MSNBC about the OWS camping and marches. It is giving her that fight-back spirit that she needs.

Thanks for all who cover OWS in a positive way. It is the movement that will energize many Americans and make them feel less alone.

For every demonstrator at an Occupy site, there are hundreds if not thousands around the country who are supporting the movement in their hearts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tex-wyo-dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. "hundreds if not thousands"...
I would say hundreds-of-thousands would be far more accurate.

Maybe even millions.

many ppl I know are supportive of the movement, but are just too afraid to possibly jeopardize their jobs to join the occupations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC