Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cable: Spain to Sec. Clinton about nuke contamination (Palomares)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 06:33 PM
Original message
Cable: Spain to Sec. Clinton about nuke contamination (Palomares)

Well, this can't be good...so were the study results ever released? And, yeah, I imagine the Spanish residents in the area would be a little upset with us.


http://wikileaks.ch/cable/2009/12/09STATE129362.html

----------------------
PALOMARES Nuclear Site
----------------------

¶12. (C) Moratinos asked the Secretary for a real
response(whatever you can do) to be helpful in terms of
Spanish public opinion, which he feared could turn against
the U.S. if news of the results of a recent study of the
site's nuclear contamination were to spread. The Secretary
noted that she remembered the accident when it happened but
made no commitment.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. Holy crap, this is about a Broken Arrow event back in '66!
1966 Palomares B-52 crash

:scared:

That's a damned good question, Rainbow4321!

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yeah..a question that Sec Clinton didn't want to commit to answering
to....

Who did the study and has it already been thru a shredder???? Obviously, the Spanish officials know about it and know the results so you know we do, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Just as an FYI I did a Google search against *.mil sites and I think the latest I came up with was..
Edited on Thu Dec-16-10 08:18 PM by Poll_Blind
...from 2002 or something like that. There might have been a later one but it (or maybe it was the one from 2002) seemed to be deliberately obfuscated. I'm betting there's one from this year, last year- very recent. I have no idea who would have done this, but if we think about the wording, it might have been done by a non-governmental group, like a citizens watchdog group or a university. If it was a military survey, I'm not sure why they'd worry so much about it getting out

Search I did in google was something like:
site:*.mil Palomares contamination report

But obviously it's a very rough search- just wanted to see what would turn up on a once-over. If you view with Google's QuickView, Google loads the document, not you.

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC